More Clergy Accused of Child Sexual Abuse in California as Important Deadline Nears
A law firm says that the 116 lawsuits may be a small percentage of the total number of suits filed under the California Child Victims Act, which was passed in 2019.
As California’s three-year window to file child sex-abuse lawsuits past the statute of limitations nears its conclusion, 66 Catholic clergy and religious have been named in 116 lawsuits in Alameda County, which covers the area between San Francisco and San Jose.
Additionally, 14 of the clergy members and religious identified in the lawsuits are named for the first time, the law firm of Jeff Anderson & Associates announced Nov. 28.
The law firm said that the 116 lawsuits may be a small percentage of the total number of suits filed under the California Child Victims Act, which was passed in 2019.
The legislation allowed a three-year period in which victims of child sex abuse could come forward with claims that would have expired under the previous statute of limitations. The window began Jan. 1, 2020, and will expire in less than a month. The bill was signed by Democrat Gov. Gavin Newsom.
The legislation allows one to file a civil lawsuit for child sexual abuse up to the age of 40, or within five years from the date that the plaintiff “discovers or reasonably should have discovered that psychological injury or illness occurring” after the age of 18 was caused by the abuse.
Previously, claims had to be filed by age 26, or within three years of discovering damages from the abuse. Dec. 31 is the last day to file a lawsuit before the window closes.
“The California Child Victims Act has helped hundreds of survivors seek justice and healing,” attorney Jeff Anderson said in a statement. “This law is a major advancement in the child protection movement, and we applaud all of the survivors who have come forward. But time is running out. Survivors must act before the Dec. 31 deadline.”
Andy Rivas, the then executive director of the California Catholic Conference of Bishops, said at the time the law, known as A.B. 218, passed that the Church viewed it as a “step forward."
“Ultimately, our hope is that all victim-survivors of childhood sexual abuse in all institutional settings will be able to have their pain and suffering addressed and resolved, and so our prayers are that A.B. 218 will be a step forward in that direction,” Rivas said.
“The Catholic Church has confronted this issue of child sexual abuse for more than two decades now,” he said. “It is a legacy of shame for all of us in the Church, and we are aware that nothing can undo the violence done to victim-survivors or restore the innocence and trust that was taken from them.”
According to the law firm, the lawsuits allege that the abuse occurred within the Archdiocese of Los Angeles, the Archdiocese of San Francisco, the Diocese of Fresno, the Diocese of Monterey, the Diocese of Oakland, the Diocese of Sacramento, the Diocese of San Jose, and the Diocese of Santa Rosa.
Brother Salvatore Billante and Father Stephen Kiesle were accused most frequently, according to the law firm. Brother Salvatore was accused at least 11 times, and Father Kiesle was accused at least nine times, the law firm said. Brother Salvatore’s alleged abuse took place at locations in the Archdiocese of San Francisco. Father Kiesle’s alleged abuse took place at locations in the Diocese of Oakland.
Fourteen of the allegations named clergy members for the first time. Their names, reported by the law firm, are Father James Corley, Father Sidney Hall, Father John A. Lynch, Father John Francis Scanlon, Father William Dodson, Father Henry Hall, Sister M. Rosella McConnell, Father Joseph Watt, Father Elwood Geary, Father Domingos S. Jacque, Brother U Benedict Reams, Father Robert Gemmet, Father Robert H. Lewis, and Father Christian Sandholdt.
It’s unclear whether the 66 accused clergy and religious are living or deceased and where they are living, the law firm said. The names of the 66 accused clergy and religious can be seen here.
“The vast majority of claims against these individuals have not been fully evaluated in a civil or criminal court,” the law firm said.
“The allegations should not be considered proven or substantiated in a court of law. All individuals should be considered innocent until proven guilty.”
Several other states, such as New York, New Jersey, Louisiana, Arizona, Montana, Hawaii, Vermont and North Carolina, have also passed legislation opening windows for lawsuits past the statute of limitations.