HOW FAR CAN WE GO?
A Catholic Guide
to Sex and Dating
by Leah Perrault
and Brett Salkeld
Novalis, 2009
112 pages, $9.95
To order: novalis.ca
(800) 387-7164
This is a book that is considerably better than what its title might suggest. The question “How far can we go?” happens to be the one that young people most frequently ask the authors when they present Church teaching on sexuality. Therefore, it serves as an attention-getter rather than as an encapsulation of the book’s main theme. The real question Leah Perrault and Brett Salkeld want people to ask is: “How am I being called to give myself in relationships?”
Phrasing the question in this manner leads directly to discussions about vocation, gift of self, commitment, respect for human dignity and marriage. It also evokes the spirit behind Pope John Paul II’s theology of the body, one that shuns rules and repositions the discussion of sexual morality so that the key question is not “What must I avoid doing?” but “How do I express my sexuality in a way that is consistent with my dignity as a person and as an image of a loving God?”
The authors, both graduate students who are married (not to each other) and have small children, refer to theology of the body only twice. However, Pope John Paul’s influence is evident throughout this small tome, especially with regard to the notions of “gift,” “communion,” the “language of the body” and the “nuptial significance of the body.”
The authors are keenly aware of the omnipresence of the secular world and the powerful influence it has on young people. They know that Christianity is countercultural. Therefore, they approach controversial issues, such as abstaining from intercourse prior to marriage, masturbation and the use of contraception, very gently and with great sensitivity. Nowhere, however, do they depart from Catholic orthodoxy.
They deserve plaudits for their convincing refutation of the tired cliché that the Church is against sex. When you love something, they argue, you want it to be properly respected. It is the abuse that you are against: “You may love hockey, but that does not mean you love tripping, slashing, goaltender interference, cherry-picking, sucker-punching and hitting from behind.”
They are also adept at distinguishing between natural family planning and contraception: “NFP alters one’s lifestyle to accommodate the nature of sex, while artificial contraception alters the nature of sex to accommodate one’s lifestyle.”
Perrault and Salkeld cover a great deal of territory, despite the brevity of their book. They provide clear and helpful presentations on vocation, discernment, virtue, conscience and love. Their presentation of intimacy includes the various levels that are part of the integrated person — emotional, intellectual, social, spiritual and physical — because intimacy includes far more than the carnal dimension.
How Far covers marital issues that go far beyond “dating.” The brevity of the text leaves no room for footnotes or bibliography, nor is there a list of recommended readings. An inquiring reader may want to know more about “studies” indicating that couples using NFP have divorce rates of less than 5%. In addition, readers might want to know about the practice of NFP. The Couple to Couple League, the Billings Method and so on are not mentioned.
This is a useful book, not only because it represents Catholic teaching on sexuality fairly, but also because it will stimulate further discussion. It has much more to offer than the title would indicate.
Donald DeMarco is professor emeritus at St. Jerome’s University and an adjunct professor at Holy Apostles College & Seminary and Mater Ecclesiae College.


Comments
Post a Comment
[This comment is based on the original review in Catholic Insight. I am unable to view the NCR piece. If this error does not occur in the NCR piece, please disregard. Also, please delete everything in square brackets if this is published. Thank you.]
I was delighted to see Donald DeMarco’s review of our book How Far Can We Go? A Catholic Guide to Sex and Dating. DeMarco understands our project well and highlights aspects of the work that will convey to readers exactly what kind of book they might be buying and why it will be useful for them.
I had to write, however, to point out that the review contains a not insignificant misquotation. The review applauds our distinction between Natural Family Planning and contraception and quotes page 94 as saying: “NFP alters one’s lifestyle to accomodate the nature of sex, while artificial contraception alters the nature of one’s lifestyle”. It should read: “NFP alters one’s lifestyle to accomodate the nature of sex, while artificial contraception alters the nature of sex to accomodate one’s lifestyle” (emphasis added). Those three words make for quite a different sentence.
We are, in any case, thankful for the great review.
Post a Comment
By submitting this form, you give The National Catholic Register permission to publish this comment. Comments will be published at our discretion, and may be edited for clarity and length. For best formatting, please limit your response to one paragraph and don't hit "enter" to force line breaks.