Early in Captain America: The First Avenger, we find Steve Rogers (Chris Evans) in a darkened movie theater unhappily protesting the boorish, disruptive behavior of another patron. “Hey, you wanna show some respect?” he appeals, not too hopefully.
How can any film lover resist such a hero? How many ringtones will echo in theaters showing Captain America this weekend? How many flashing handheld screens will distract viewers while their neighbors text or tweet about the movie or about what they had for dinner? A hero who champions respect, civility and silence in movie theaters is surely a hero for our times, even if the year is 1943 and there are no mobile phones yet. Why don’t more of us object to that sort of behavior?
Steve’s agitation is compounded by what’s on the screen: a patriotic World War II newsreel celebrating the nation’s efforts to pull together for the war effort, down to children collecting scrap metal. His appeal is a plea for respect not only for other audience members, but for the nation, for the war effort, for the soldiers dying overseas. It’s a plea that falls on deaf ears: The next scene finds poor Steve in an alley behind the theater, enduring a nasty beat down from the noisy bully. Oh yes, that’s why more of us don’t object.
But this is what separates Steve from the rest of us: not that he’s bigger and stronger — on the contrary, he’s a proverbial 98-pound weakling with a host of health problems who keeps getting slapped with a 4-F classification (unfit for service), no matter how many times he tries to enlist. What’s special about Steve is that he stands up for what’s right no matter how many times he gets knocked down.
After a rash of immature, bad-boy cinematic superheroes for whom responsibility is a bigger challenge than taking down supervillains — think Iron Man, Thor and Green Lantern — a hero for whom decency, humility and self-sacrifice come naturally is a breath of fresh air. Even Peter Parker, as nice a guy as he may have been before that spider bit him, had to learn the hard way that with great power comes great responsibility. Steve has all the responsibility in the world; it’s the power that he lacks.
That’s what brings Steve to the attention of Dr. Abraham Erskine (Stanley Tucci), an expatriate German scientist who defected to the U.S. and brought with him research with which the U.S. military hopes to create an army of enhanced “super soldiers.” Naturally, the Germans, with their whole eugenic Aryan master-race thing, want the same thing. Things do not go according to plan, and the upshot is that the Americans and the Germans each wind up with one super soldier apiece: Steve Rogers, who becomes Captain America, and Nazi officer Johann Schmidt (Hugo Weaving), the Red Skull.
Nimbly avoiding origin-story doldrums, the filmmakers whip up a consistently entertaining blend of period piece, war movie, sci-fi action flick and James Bond thriller that never feels like they’re just setting up pieces or plodding through predetermined plot points. It’s easily the most satisfying origin story since Batman Begins, and the best chapter yet in the films of the “Marvel Cinematic Universe” converging on next year’s Avengers movie.
In some ways, Captain America is as gratifyingly old-fashioned as its hero, channeling 1940s’ Hollywood by way of Raiders of the Lost Ark, which director Joe Johnston worked on as an art director and visual effects professional, and which is overtly referenced a number of times. Although the WWII milieu is filtered through comic-book sensibilities, the sci-fi elements feel as much like 1940s’ futurism as modern retro fantasy, accentuated by a World Fair-style “Modern Marvels Pavilion” technology expo featuring a strangely familiar Howard Stark (Dominic Cooper), whom you can easily see being the father of Robert Downey Jr.’s Tony Stark.
Startlingly persuasive computer effects allow the powerfully built Evans to play the scrawny Steve as well as the bulked-up Cap, but the technology is secondary to Evans’ appealing performance, which anchors the character through his transformation in a way that wouldn’t have worked swapping out different actors. After Evans’ turn as the obnoxious Human Torch in the lame Fantastic Four films, I was deeply skeptical that he was right for Cap, but he steps into the role like he was born for it.
Narnia screenwriters Christopher Markus and Stephen McFeely do far better justice to Joe Simon and Jack Kirby’s pulp hero than they have to C. S. Lewis’ fantasies. Although the material is played straight, without postmodern irony or camp, the film brilliantly narrativizes Captain America’s actual origins as an icon of patriotic war-era propaganda to fashion a subversive explanation for the iconic “Captain America” identity.
What happens is this: After a rousing chase scene in the streets of New York, Steve becomes a media hero — only to find himself being exploited to sell war bonds, much like the heroes of Clint Eastwood’s Flags of Our Fathers, obliged to re-enact their famous flag-raising at Iwo Jima over and over at war-bond sales shows.
In Steve’s case, he finds himself stepping onstage at USO shows in cheesy, star-spangled long johns, flanked by a chorus line of dancing girls in a period-perfect production number, punching out “Adolf Hitler” night after night. There are also “Captain America” propaganda films (“I enjoy your films,” the Red Skull taunts at one point) and comic books in the hands of children (along with a nifty shot of a group of children playing with a garbage can lid painted red, white and blue).
It isn’t until Steve finds himself at a USO camp show for jaded servicemen overseas that the door opens for a truly heroic chapter in Cap’s career. Later, there’s a second, more battle-worthy uniform and a series of ever-bigger action set pieces. The reinvented uniform works surprisingly well, and I appreciate that the movie honors both versions of Cap’s shield: the original, triangular heater-shaped shield and the famously aerodynamic, indestructible buckler.
Supporting roles are remarkably well cast. Weaving rocks a cartoony Werner Herzog accent as the Red Skull, and Tucci projects Einsteinian enlightenment as Erskine. Tommy Lee Jones brings all his crusty swagger to a skeptical officer who wanted a super-soldier army but has no use for just one. Hayley Atwell makes more of an impression as Peggy Carter than any recent superhero movie love interest except Gwyneth Paltrow. (In keeping with the film’s traditional sensibilities, their chaste romance goes no further than a kiss.)
For the most part, Captain America works as a stand-alone adventure, although the denouement dovetails tightly with modern-day Avengers continuity, and a magical McGuffin called the Cosmic Cube is introduced but not explained — for now. While the movie generally works like gangbusters, and there’s little if anything that doesn’t work at all, there is one notable omission that I hope the Avengers movie may rectify.
I appreciate that when Erskine asks Steve, “Do you want to kill Nazis?” Steve’s response is: “I don’t want to kill anyone. I don’t like bullies, no matter where they’re from.” That’s a fine sentiment, and a universal one.
At the same time, Captain America is not a universal hero. He’s a hero uniquely identified with the iconography, mythology and aspirations of a particular nation. What does America mean to Steve? What does it mean to him to be an American? I’m not saying Steve needs to be Jimmy Stewart’s Mr. Smith or anything, although, actually, something in that direction might have helped.
Going beyond the character’s underdeveloped comic-book origins might have helped too. Superman’s values were shaped by salt-of-the-earth Ma and Pa Kent and Kansas farm life. Spider-Man’s sense of responsibility was shaped by Uncle Ben in life and death, and Aunt May helps him keep it real. Batman is defined by his parents’ murder. Where does Steve Rogers come from? When did his family come to America? What did America mean to his parents?
Of course, I understand the filmmakers’ reticence; they want to avoid any appearance of jingoism to be as marketable as possible overseas. (At one point, the studio was actually considering marketing the film overseas as The First Avenger without even referring to Captain America; it now seems the film will be called Captain America everywhere but Russia, the Ukraine and South Korea.)
Still, with this hero, if you aren’t willing to at least run the risk of an appearance of a little jingoism, you can’t help falsifying the character to some extent. It’s one thing for a movie like Superman Returns to toss out a line about Superman standing for “truth, justice, all that stuff,” in part because “the American way” wasn’t a fixture of Superman’s spiel until the 1950s; back in the 1940s, Superman really did fight for “truth and justice.”
Captain America is different. He needs to fight for the American way. On the other hand, the iconography of Americana is all over the film, from the Uncle Sam recruitment posters to the wonderfully designed end credits sequence — and, of course, Cap’s star-spangled self.
Captain America doesn’t transcend the comic-book genre, but it succeeds as a movie like few recent superhero movies have. In a disappointing summer season, Captain America stands head and shoulders over anything else.
Register film critic Steven D. Greydanus blogs at NCRegister.com.
Content advisory: Much hand-to-hand, firearm and action violence, frequently fatal and sometimes bloody; a villain committing suicide to avoid capture; hearty drinking; a couple of kisses and mildly suggestive content; limited profanity and some cursing and crude language. Might be okay for older kids.


Comments
Post a Comment
Now to convince my wife to go see it for our anniversary!
@ Peter Turner: Suz and I have our 20th coming up, so I’ve been thinking about such things myself. CAPTAIN AMERICA might just be a great date movie, with the right woman; I don’t recommend it for an anniversary outing!
(SIGH) I wasn’t gonna see it this weekend ‘cos it’s gonna be a very busy one but, after reading your review SDG, I’m not sure I can miss it!
Yeah, like a fanboy needs an excuse, anyway, right? XD
WOOT!
And make sure you watch till the end of the credits (^_^)
I wish the Hydra goons had had a more historical uniform; it would have helped the ray guns fit the “Weird WWII/Stupid Jetpack Hitler” aesthetic better. As is, it looks more like they were just imported from the future wholesale. I think Cap’s first combat uniform nailed the look properly, as did the giant city-killer tank.
Why watch death and violence, when you can have Life and abundance of it?
Because I don’t get to punch Nazi goons and use lazer guns in real life. (^_~) But seriously, cinema and life aren’t mutually exclusive, I can enjoy both.
CAPTAIN AMERICA sounds and looks like a GREAT movie
looks GREAT!!!!!
I saw a preview last night.
.
And I was horrified to see the pro-quasi-eugenic foundation of the story.
.
Eugenics as the basis for a hero??
.
This is exactly the WRONG message that any of us should want any of our kids to see.
@ Bender: CAPTAIN AMERICA has nothing to do with eugenics. Eugenics has to do with breeding and genetics. CAPTAIN AMERICA has nothing to do with that. Steve Rogers is a 98-pound weakling (a eugenic failure) who is transformed into a super soldier by fantasy science, the same as Spider-Man or the Fantastic Four.
Now, if you wanted to go after CAPTAIN AMERICA for something, you could argue that because Cap is enhanced by a “super soldier serum,” it sends kids a bad message on, like, steroids and doping. Really, though, I think kids understand it’s a fantasy thing. Pro baseball is the danger here, not CAPTAIN AMERICA.
P.S. Also, Bender, CAPTAIN AMERICA makes it VERY clear that the “basis for a hero” in this movie is not powers or physical performance, but compassion, dedication, respect, responsibility, courage and self-sacrifice. A hero in this film is not a super-soldier, but a “good man.” That’s the real message of CAPTAIN AMERICA to kids, and I think it’s exactly the right message. Sorry you missed that.
Thanks for the recommendation. Yesterday a friend and I saw “The Tree of Life” and left the theater very depressed. It seemed to be a movie about a dysfunctional family growing up in the 1950’s and 1960’s, interspersed with footage from NatGeo, the Nature channel and other similar TV offerings. Not to be disrespectful of the film producer…the reviews we read all gave it a thumbs-up. Since friend and I agreed that we both grew up in dysfunctional families, we don’t need to be reminded! She said it was like trying to figure out the meaning of a “modernistic” painting.
Whatever one might call it technically, eugenics or quasi-eugenics or whatever, the underlying mindset is the same, the rejection of the “unfit” and the desire to create a “superman.”
The meek shall inherit the earth it ain’t.
Better that the 98-pound weakling had stayed a 98-pound weakling and still became the hero. As it is, the message is—if you are a 98-pound weakling, you are worthless and must be reformed. The 98-pound weakling must be “killed” and a new man, a better man, reborn.
@ Bender: Where do you get “rejection of the unfit”? The movie specifically CELEBRATES Steve’s weakness as a source of his virtue (compassion, humility). It is BECAUSE Steve has been a weak man that he will not be a bully, that he is worthy of becoming a super soldier. A man who has always been strong lacks these virtues according to the film.
Heck, you could almost call this movie a case in point of the weak inheriting the earth!
Besides, look at how Bucky Barnes loves weak Steve. Clearly the movie doesn’t consider weak Steve to be worthless or worthy of being rejected.
There is no shortage today of movies with skinny, wimpy boys as heroes (e.g., HOW TO TRAIN YOUR DRAGON). I’ve actually gotten complaints from parents of boys who want more overtly masculine images of heroism from Hollywood.
Now here one is—and he’s a completely admirable hero and a great guy—and even that isn’t good enough for you, because the comic-book source material supplies a standard-issue transformation. You just can’t please some people!
@ Annie: Let me know if your friend feels less bummed out after seeing CAPTAIN AMERICA!
Sadly I doubt I’ll get to see this one in theaters; I just don’t go to many movies, and I’m just hoping that that when/if my family decides to go see something it will be Winnie the Pooh and not Monte Carlo.
But I’ll definitely try to grab the DVD or Blu-ray. I was afraid this movie was not going to be very good, but now I’m excited for it. Thanks for the review!
One question, though, that occurred to me after seeing a commercial: I’m pretty sure I saw the good Captain firing a gun in the ad. Does he use guns in the comics? Not that it would be some major moral issue or anything like that (especially after Iron Man’s missiiles); it just seems a little odd to me for some reason.
@ Line by Line: As a soldier in WWII combat situations, Cap does indeed wield a gun in the film. I can’t remember him ever doing that in the comics (although of course I only ever read Cap’s modern-day adventures). I agree with you that it takes a bit of getting used to, but I also agree that it’s not morally problematic, and it does make some sense.
Captain America is an extremely enjoyable film on many levels. Where it falls short in terms of cinematic excellence when compared to The Dark Night, it makes up for in family viewing fun (it is too intense for youngsters). The only quibble I have now is that my son keeps saying “You Fondue”?
Thanks for the great reviews. Keep ‘em coming.
I actually was incredibly disappointed by this film, maybe I’m too much of a Captain America fan or whatever. In one scene they flash a bunch of images of CA fighting in various missions, and coming from a comic book standpoint, fighting the nazi’s was and always has been his original thing. They skipped at least 15 years of comic book nazi ass kicking in under 5 minutes; and with Bucky in one of the following scenes, they skipped probably one of the most intense periods in CA’s life. Plus, Samuel L. Jackson walking on screen with his ridiculous eyepatch just about ruined what was left of the movie. Action wise and special effects wise it was brilliant, no doubt about that. But now, honestly, as cool as The Avengers may have appeared before, I foresee a bleak upcoming future for superhero fans everywhere. It seems to be similar to The Expendables, where they put a bunch of badass people together and advertise everywhere of how awesome its going to be, only to have a movie mainly filled with explosions and blood flying everywhere. It wasn’t by any means a bad movie, but it’s not worth the waste of space on my movie rack. Hopefully The Avengers will manage to pull though.
A wonderfully enjoyable, uplifting movie. Who said wholesome can’t be fun?
I was very happy to see one face in Cap’s Commandos: actor Neal McDonough, a man with strong Catholic values (so strong that he’s turned down roles with immoral behaviors) who keeps busy in upholding the good-guy image in roles he plays. Those who have purchased the “Truth and Life” audio Bible hear his voice as well, I believe in voicing Christ Himself.
Post a Comment
By submitting this form, you give The National Catholic Register permission to publish this comment. Comments will be published at our discretion, and may be edited for clarity and length. For best formatting, please limit your response to one paragraph and don't hit "enter" to force line breaks.