Print Article | Email Article | Write To Us

Daily News

Bishops Refocus Defense of Marriage (3267)

Veteran Massachusetts lobbyist takes national role.

06/27/2011 Comments (9)
Shutterstock

– Shutterstock

WASHINGTON — Friday night’s vote in the New York state Senate to legalize same-sex “marriage” adds new impetus for church-led efforts to defend the institution of marriage.

New York is now the sixth and largest state to approve homosexual “marriage,” fueling optimism among activists seeking to secure “marriage equality” in every state.

Meanwhile, a new representative of the U.S. bishops will bring the truth about marriage and family to key legislators on Capitol Hill.

Calling himself “the bishops’ marriage guy” — a tongue-in-cheek comment that sums up his role — Daniel Avila describes traditional marriage as “critical to human development.”

A native of Indiana who served the Massachusetts Catholic Conference for the past 14 years, Avila did not mince words about the dangers of experimenting with a fundamental social institution: To eliminate sexual difference is to manipulate the essential DNA of the institution.

“It’s like a nuclear bomb exploding in every home, and that explosion will reshape society itself,” he said. “I don’t think we can even describe the frontiers of change that confront us.”

He added that the bishops are fully aware of the challenge that lies ahead. For that reason, the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops continues to dedicate more resources to the defense of marriage in the public square, including the addition of Avila’s position as policy advisor for marriage and family.

William May, chairman of Catholics for the Common Good in California, said that such a position “has been needed for a long time.”

He applauded Avila’s appointment, saying, “Dan is so well grounded in Catholic social teaching. He’s a very savvy student and practitioner of public policy and advocacy. He’s dedicated, hardworking and highly skilled, and is widely respected across the country.”


A New Generation for Marriage

Avila, who began his duties June 20, serves the Subcommittee for the Promotion & Defense of Marriage, which was created in 2008 with a three-year mandate. Late last year,  the subcommittee, chaired by Bishop Salvatore Cordileone of Oakland, Calif.,  became a permanent part of the USCCB.

Giving an update at the bishops’ meeting in Seattle on June 15, Bishop Cordileone said marriage benefits children and meets their need for both a mother and a father. A new generation must be encouraged to live the marriage vocation “as God intended,” he said.

Andy Lichtenwalner, program specialist for the subcommittee, said the bishops are called to teach the truth about marriage to all. “These are truths that are meant to be shared, that are meant to inform public policy and law,” he said.

Avila served on the Massachusetts Catholic Conference, when it joined an alliance of religious and political organizations that sought to block the legalization of same-sex marriage, following a 2003 state Supreme Judicial Court decision which found that   Massachusetts could not deny marriage licenses to same-sex couples, making the Bay State the first to redefine marriage.

Traditional-marriage supporters were blocked by the Massachusetts Legislature from securing a referendum that would allow voters in the state to weigh in on the controversial issue.

Opponents of same-sex marriage were devastated by their failure to prevent the groundbreaking law, but they grew closer as they became the targets of heated outbursts by their political foes.

The shared experience strengthened the bonds between the activists that worked closely together on strategy and communications. 

“I loved being allied with so many people who are in a tough territory — mission territory — up there,” Avila said.

In the majority decision, the Massachusetts justices wrote that the state’s constitution could not “tolerate” the “persistent prejudices” of traditional-marriage supporters

Avila said he immediately saw negative implications for religious freedom. Since then, Catholic Charities in Boston has ceased adoption work because the law required the organization to place children with same-sex couples. In addition, parents have seen same-sex “marriage” normalized in their children’s public schools, and employees who speak up in favor of traditional marriage have been fired.

Those negative outcomes, though devastating for Massachusetts, have pushed other states to pass marriage amendments or defeat same-sex union legislation. In every state where the voters have had the chance to make their view known, they have backed traditional marriage.


Catechesis

Anticipating future battles on the issue, Avila emphasizes the importance of catechesis to strengthen Catholics’ understanding of the fundamental importance of traditional marriage. 

He noted that when same-sex marriage was first secured in Massachusetts, the bishops in the state were worried by the relatively high level of Catholic support for same-sex unions. But after the bishops distributed one million fliers on marriage to the faithful, there was a 25% shift in favor of church teaching.

“[The opinion shift] forever cemented the conviction in my mind that people just need to be educated and motivated, and then we will have very strong support in the Catholic community for traditional marriage,” he said.

The Catholic Church must speak about the beauty of traditional marriage, he said, even in the face of vitriol.

“Anger is just simply a sign for a very deep need for love,” Avila suggested. “The courage and extraordinary witness of those who, in the face of such need for love, stand up [and] speak the truth in charity — it just always, always, every time I see it, always affirms for me the providence of God and the goodness of people.”

Register correspondent Christine M. Williams writes from Quincy, Massachusetts.

 

 

Filed under bishops, daniel avila, marriage, massachusetts, new york state, same-sex 'marriage'

Comments

Post a Comment

I think that if everyone who thinks that marriage is important would not be afraid to talk to their friends and acquaintances about why society expects people to get married in the first place and the damage that legally recognizing same-sex “marriage” does to a society, that it would not be long before the tide would start to change.  That can only happen, though, if we refuse to let the social engineers shame us into shutting up, which is their only real hope, as evidenced by the fact that that is their primary and in many cases only tactic.

Please spare us. Did you see what Bill Donohue did to the last report from John Jay College (which cost the Church $1.8 million)? He eviscerated it. It was worthless as it excluded priestly homosexuality as a major factor in the predations.
What success did Mr. Avila enjoy in Mass.? These bishops, who can’t even obey Abp Burke who is demanding they deny the Eucharist to these wayward politicians, are feckless, incompetent bunglers.

I wonder how the catechism will work once filtered through parish catechists who dissent from the Church and the bishops on the issue.

The Church is nothing more than a poltical apparatus. A quickly becoming irrelant money wasting joke. While schools and churches close.. and a generation completely leaving the church.. they choose to spend all our money on a hateful… and loosing cause.

A lot of souls will be going to hell because of same sex marriage. People don’t believe theresuch a place as hell. In the bible it says that God said a man shall not lie with a man as with a woman and it is an abomoantion to God. Don’t remeber which boo of the old testament it is in.

We are not disobeying the Church when we marry people of the same-sex; we are disobeying God.  Even how much we put legitimacy to same-sex marriage, it is will illegitimate, invalid and immoral.  Nature does not support it neither does science—like poles attract, unlike poles repel.  Do not go against the will of God, you will go nowhere except where Lucifer is right now.  And why is he where he is?  because of pride.

If the Church is serious about “protecting marriage,” it should mount a campaign to abolish divorce.  Look at the numbers: in Massachusetts, since gay marriages have been legal, there have only been 8,000 or so such marriages, while there have been many times more divorces of straight couples. 

Does the Church really think that the existence of gay marriages will cause straight couples to decide not to wed?  Maybe I am wrong, but that would be the last thing on their minds.

That gays take marriage seriously says something about commitment to an institution that has a 50% failure rate amongst straights.  Gays believe more strongly in marriage, apparently.

So now your lobbyist, Mr. Avila, says that gay men and lesbians are born that way because Satan and his minions, when they are not busy causing natural disasters, make a certain number of fetuses gay.  This is the kind of ignorant superstition I would expect from a primitive culture that throws virgins into volcanoes to appease the gods.  Apparently, the Catholic Church is to Christian theology what “paint by numbers” is to art.  No wonder your arguments against marriage equality for those who do not share your faith are so patently absurd.

Clint Batterson wrote that “Mr. Avila says that gay men and lesbians are born that way because Satan and his minions, when they are not busy causing natural disasters, make a certain number of fetuses gay.” He misrepresents or has not read the original article, and then follows up with superficial straw-men/ad-hominem cliches, which suggest that he knows patently little about actual Catholic theology, the Catholic origins of history’s most beautiful art, or the scientifically corroborated insights of Catholic teaching on the theological meaning and societal import of marriage. The point is that Christian belief holds that God’s original Creation was perfect; all imperfections in the world (whether human or otherwise) stem from the destruction of harmony between themselves and with all creation, which resulted from the original rejection of God by the first human couple, tempted and deceived by an intelligent being opposed to God’s goodness.

Post a Comment

By submitting this form, you give The National Catholic Register permission to publish this comment. Comments will be published at our discretion, and may be edited for clarity and length. For best formatting, please limit your response to one paragraph and don't hit "enter" to force line breaks.

Name:

Email:

Write your comment:

Please enter the word you see in the image below:

     

Notify me of follow-up comments.