Print Article | Email Article | Write To Us

Daily News

Judge: New Jersey Hospital Can't Force Nurses to Assist Abortions (5599)

Two were scheduled to assist at an abortion Nov. 4. The court order, which the hospital agreed to, is in effect until a Nov. 18 hearing.

11/04/2011 Comments (16)
Alliance Defense Fund

Lorna Jose Mendoza is one of 12 nurses suing a New Jersey hospital for its mandate that they participate in abortions.

– Alliance Defense Fund

NEWARK, N.J. (CNA)—Federal judge Jose Linares issued a temporary restraining order on Nov. 3 that forbids a New Jersey hospital from forcing 12 nurses to assist with abortions.

“Pro-life nurses shouldn’t be forced to assist or train in services related to abortions. Federal and state law both prohibit this,” said Alliance Defense Fund attorney Matt Bowman.

The court order, which the hospital agreed to, is in effect until a Nov. 18 hearing.

Despite the upcoming hearing, Bowman called it “disturbing” that the hospital “may fight to continue violating laws that clearly protect conscience rights.”

On Oct. 31, the defense fund filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court in New Jersey on behalf of a dozen nurses, who currently work at the University of Medicine and Dentistry in New Jersey.

According to Bowman, the hospital violated federal and state law by requiring the nurses to perform abortions against their consciences and threatening to terminate their jobs if they refuse.

“These 12 nurses have encountered threats to their jobs at this hospital ever since a policy change required them to participate in the abortion cases, regardless of their religious and moral objections,” he explained.

Two of the nurses — Lorna Mendoza and Julita Ching — were both scheduled to assist with an abortion on Nov. 4.

According to the court order, hospital officials “are restrained from requiring the named plaintiffs from undergoing any training, procedures or performances relating to abortions pending the court’s determination on the merits regarding the plaintiffs’ Application for a Preliminary Injunction.”

The order also prohibits any “employment discrimination” against the nurses until the situation is resolved.

Nov. 2 story below.
TRENTON, N.J. — Twelve nurses in New Jersey have filed a lawsuit against a local government hospital for being told they would lose their jobs if they refuse to perform abortions.

The case shows evidence of “a systematic attack on the right of pro-life professionals to engage in their careers without being forced to violate their fundamental moral and religious beliefs,” Matt Bowman, attorney for the Alliance Defense Fund, told CNA.

On Oct. 31, the defense fund filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court in New Jersey on behalf of the dozen nurses, who currently work at the University of Medicine and Dentistry in New Jersey.

According to Bowman, the hospital has violated federal and state law by requiring the nurses to perform abortions against their consciences and threatening to terminate their jobs if they refuse.

Two of the nurses — Lorna Mendoza and Julita Ching — are both scheduled to assist with an abortion this Friday, Nov. 4.

Bowman said that although the hospital has been performing abortions for many years, nurses had not been forced to assist until the hospital recently passed a policy and put one of the nurses who does abortions in a supervisory position.

Despite hospital officials initially agreeing to meet with the 12 nurses to discuss the issue, Bowman said, the meeting was canceled at the last minute when the nurses arrived with an attorney.

“We are asking the hospital to cease its illegal compulsion immediately,” he said, adding that the hospital is aware of the lawsuit.

“We’re going to ask the court to order the hospital to obey the law and to not violate our clients’ beliefs, and we’re going to ask the court to make the hospital give back the millions of dollars that it’s received in tax money on the promise that it would not force health care personnel to assist abortions.”

Bowman noted that the Alliance Defense Fund is seeing more and more cases of pro-life health care personnel being forced to assist in abortions and other practices that they object to on moral grounds.

“Even though we have federal and state laws in the books that protect them,” the hospital is “blatantly violating the law in an arrogant way,” he said.

The attorney said the situation is becoming more common in the U.S., with medical workers’ conscience protections being increasingly disregarded. 

“This case shows that there is a rampant crisis in which entities — that are getting tens and even hundreds of millions of dollars from the federal government — are violating public trust by forcing health care personnel to participate in abortions against their religious beliefs. ”


Update, Nov. 3, 2011: LifeNews.com reported that a federal judge issued a temporary restraining order Thursday prohibiting a New Jersey hospital from forcing any of 12 nurses that sued the facility to participate in training or services related to abortions.

 

 

Filed under abortion, conscientious objection, hospitals, new jersey, nurses, religious liberty