Print Article | Email Article | Write To Us

The Witness of the Prophets to the Perpetual Virginity of Mary

Monday, October 08, 2012 1:01 AM Comments (16)

Given the witness of Mary, Joseph, the Evangelists, and Jesus himself, it’s not surprising to find the early Church Fathers firmly embracing the belief that Mary was ever-virgin. They, too, recognized the connection between Mary and the ark, and saw in Mary’s Perpetual Virginity something that attends everything else about Jesus’ life—the fulfillment of prophecy. This is most notable in the Fathers’ reading of the prophet Ezekiel.

Ezekiel lived about five hundred years before Christ. In Ezekiel’s day, the ten tribes of the northern kingdom of Israel had been scattered by the Assyrian Empire (hence the “Ten Lost Tribes of Israel” ) while the southern “rump” kingdom of Judah had itself been carted off to captivity in Babylon after the destruction of Solomon’s Temple. It seemed that Israel was doomed to be annihilated, crushed between the hammer of Assyria and the anvil of Babylon.

But then God raised up prophets like Ezekiel to promise that Israel had not been forsaken and that the Almighty would restore her fortunes, return her to her land, send her a Messiah, and use Israel to bless all the nations of the earth, just as he had promised Abraham long ago (Gen. 12:1–3). In Ezekiel’s case, this prophetic message included a lengthy vision—recorded in Ezekiel 40–48— describing a restored temple, a revived land of Israel, and a renewed city of Jerusalem.

Now the temple was indeed rebuilt (cf. Ezra and Nehemiah), but it didn’t (and couldn’t) look like the temple of Ezekiel’s prophecy. Why? Because in Ezekiel’s visionary temple things like this happen:

Then he brought me back to the door of the temple; and behold, water was issuing from below the threshold of the temple toward the east (for the temple faced east); and the water was flowing down from below the south end of the threshold of the temple, south of the altar. Then he brought me out by way of the north gate, and led me round on the outside to the outer gate, that faces toward the east; and the water was coming out on the south side.

Going on eastward with a line in his hand, the man measured a thousand cubits, and then led me through the water; and it was ankle-deep. Again he measured a thousand, and led me through the water; and it was knee-deep. Again he measured a thousand, and led me through the water; and it was up to the loins. Again he measured a thousand, and it was a river that I could not pass through, for the water had risen; it was deep enough to swim in, a river that could not be passed through. And he said to me, “Son of man, have you seen this?”

Then he led me back along the bank of the river. As I went back, I saw upon the bank of the river very many trees on the one side and on the other. And he said to me, “This water flows toward the eastern region and goes down into the Arabah; and when it enters the stagnant waters of the sea, the water will become fresh. And wherever the river goes every living creature which swarms will live, and there will be very many fish; for this water goes there, that the waters of the sea may become fresh; so everything will live where the river goes. Fishermen will stand beside the sea; from En-gedi to En-eglaim it will be a place for the spreading of nets; its fish will be of very many kinds, like the fish of the Great Sea. But its swamps and marshes will not become fresh; they are to be left for salt. And on the banks, on both sides of the river, there will grow all kinds of trees for food. Their leaves will not wither nor their fruit fail, but they will bear fresh fruit every month, because the water for them flows from the sanctuary. Their fruit will be for food, and their leaves for healing” (Ezek. 47:1–12).

There never was (and never will be) a physical temple with a river flowing out of it. So what is Ezekiel getting at? To find out, we must pay attention to a rabbi named Jesus of Nazareth as he comes to the rebuilt temple five hundred years later to celebrate the Feast of Tabernacles (John 7).

The Feast of Tabernacles is described in Leviticus 23:33–43 and Deuteronomy 16:13–16 as a commemoration of Israel’s living in tents in the wilderness (Lev. 23:43) and a thanksgiving for Israel’s permanent home in the Promised Land. In addition, the feast also offers thanks for the temple, the successor of the Mosaic Tabernacle (Ex. 25–31) as a permanent place of worship. Note that both the tabernacle and the temple were home to the ark of the covenant until the ark vanished several centuries before Christ’s birth.

As Israel wandered in the wilderness during the Exodus, the people suffered from thirst. In answer to their complaints, Moses strikes a rock, from which water flows to quench Israel’s thirst (Num. 20). By Jesus’ day this event was commemorated in the Feast of Tabernacles in a curious ritual: Every morning during the feast, a priest went down to the Pool of Siloam and brought back a golden pitcher of water to the temple (the successor of Moses’ Tabernacle). This water was poured on the altar of holocausts amidst the singing of the “Hallel” (that is, Psalms 112–117) and the joyful sound of musical instruments. Interestingly, this practice became part of the feast after the rebuilding of the temple following the Babylonian Exile—that is, after the prophecy of Ezekiel’s river flowing from the temple.

So, during the Feast of Tabernacles, Jesus announces to the crowd, “If any one thirst, let him come to me and drink. He who believes in me, as the scripture has said, ‘Out of his heart shall flow rivers of living water’” (John 7:37–38). As we already know, Jesus uses the image of living water to refer to the Holy Spirit (cf. John 4). Yet curiously, there’s no passage in Old Testament Scripture that says, “Out of his heart shall flow rivers of living water.” What, then, is Jesus referring to?

He is referring to Ezekiel 47 and following. After all, Jesus has already told us what the true temple is when he declared, “Destroy this temple, and in three days I will raise it up” (John 2:19). As John makes crystal clear, “[H]e spoke of the temple of his body” (John 2:21). So Jesus is declaring to all at the Feast of Tabernacles that Ezekiel’s vision is not a physical description of a stone building, but a spiritual description of the true temple, the Body of Christ. For the same reason, John says that Jesus “tabernacled” among us (John 1:14) when he became man. Paul makes the same connection, referring both to individual Christians and to the mystical Body of Christ as the temple (1 Cor. 3:16–17; Eph. 2:21).

So Jesus is identifying himself with the temple of Ezekiel’s vision. He is making clear that he is the true temple and his heart is the Holy of Holies. The water of the Feast of Tabernacles, the water flowing from the rock of Moses, from the rock on which the visionary Temple of Ezekiel is founded, flows from his heart. The rock, as Paul makes clear, is Christ (1 Cor. 10:1–4). And John will make this even clearer as his Gospel reaches its climax and blood and water flow from the pierced side Christ.

In other words, the Incarnation is being likened to God coming to dwell in his temple in majesty. Or rather, the Old Testament moments in which God descended in majesty on the tabernacle and the temple in the pillar of cloud (cf. Ex. 40:34–38; 1 Kgs. 8:10–11) are revealed to be prophetic foreshadows of when God truly came to dwell in his temple: when the Word became flesh and tabernacled among us.

Now the interesting thing, the Fathers noticed, is that Ezekiel speaks directly to this image of the Lord coming in majesty to dwell in his temple. For the prophet wrote:

Then he brought me back to the outer gate of the sanctuary, which faces east; and it was shut. And he said to me, “This gate shall remain shut; it shall not be opened, and no one shall enter by it; for the Lord, the God of Israel, has entered by it; therefore it shall remain shut” (Ezek. 44:1–2).

In short, the gate into the Incarnation (i.e., Mary) shall be holy to the Lord and not for any common purpose. And in token of this, the gate of the mystical temple shall be shut to all but the Lord.

As an Evangelical, I had long regarded the reading of Ezekiel 44:1–2 to support Mary’s Perpetual Virginity as mere “proof texting.” I thought the Fathers were beginning with this passage and then trying to build a doctrine of Perpetual Virginity on it. But the more I saw how the early Church (including the New Testament authors) linked the tabernacle, the temple, and the Body of Christ, and the roles of Mary, the ark, and the gate of the temple, the more I came to realize that the Church’s faith in Mary’s Perpetual Virginity was not derived from Ezekiel 44:1–2 any more than her faith in the Virgin Birth was derived from Isaiah 7:14. Rather, as with the Virgin Birth, the Perpetual Virginity of Mary happened, and only afterward did the Church begin to realize that the events of her life, like the events of her Son’s, were strangely —one might even say prophetically—foreshadowed in Ezekiel 44:1–2. And so there dawned on me at last the recognition of a real, organic, un-manufactured connection between Mary and something the prophet Ezekiel had been inspired to see.

 

Filed under mary, mother of the son

Comments

Post a Comment

Mark,
That is brilliant.  Thank you.  I have come to understand the Virgin Birth
better through your help of understanding that scripture.  I may have to turn to the first half of the Bible more often to “see” how the Lord worked his saving incarnation.

Blessings and Peace,
Bill

Mark,

This is the kind of article I need to forward to my brother who left the Church for Evangelicalism. Please write more of these on teachings of the Church that Protastants don’t believe. Maybe we can bring him back!

Better than brilliant. Holy.

Thank you, Mark, for a very noteworthy insight.

“There never was (and never will be) a physical temple with a river flowing out of it. “

I’m puzzled by this comment, and likely because I’m thinking far too literally.  But I know many such places that such a temple could be built.  And it’s only a little masonry work to make such a temple have waterfalls facing east and south.

The only problem I see is finding such a thing in a desert (Arabia) that only has intermittent naturally occurring rivers (Wabi in Arabic, which are only filled when infrequent rains come)

And to explain a bit further, I often use the non-Christian Hindu example of devotion to Dewi Danu to refute belief in scientism; and she has many temples with rivers flowing out of them in Bali.  When the atheist communists attempted to take over these temples back in the 1970s, they caused a natural disaster for a few years as the agricultural balance of the island went out of whack.  It’s an excellent example of local religious tradition beating the knowledge of man all hollow.

Ted:

But the Jewish temple wasn’t built just anywhere.  It was built on Mt. Moriah in Jerusalem.  And it is simply a matter of historic fact that no river flowed from the Temple.

It’s the (and never will be) parenthetical that I’m disagreeing with.  Climates do change.  Israel in particular in the late 20th century, by planting new forests, is indeed changing the climate of Israel.  Merely because there’s no river (though from the description in Ezekiel, we’re talking a small stream- a thousand cubits downhill and it’s still only ankle deep and seems to meander a lot, as it’s in a different direction than it started- perhaps a spring) now, doesn’t mean that there never will be.  Eventually, the Dome of the Rock *will* be no more, even if it’s a hundred thousand years from now- and the temple will be rebuilt.

And there do exist, as I pointed out, temples in other religions with springs and streams and rivers and lakes flowing out of them.

Never, as a wise teddy bear once said, is a very long time.  :-)

St. Thomas Aquinas uses this same passage from Ezekiel when arguing in favor of the Perpetual Virginity, so Jimmy is definitely in good company when he makes use of this passage.

www.unamsanctamcatholicam.com

Woops…I meant Mark, not Jimmy. Forgot what blog I was reading.

well done, good and faithful servant!

The problem with going to great lengths to use the Bible to prove so many things, is it waters down *key issues* for us, when we need them.  For instance, I know people that use the Bible to say same sex marriage is fine, when the Bible CLEARLY indicates that homosexual behavior is NOT acceptable to God.

While the virgin birth of Jesus is critical for Christians to believe, the perpetual virginity of Mary is NOT critical in the long term, looking at God’s plan for our salvation and for our eternal life.  Think about it:
after Jesus was born, does Mary’s perpetual virginity really matter? No.

With our country at a crossroads, and VatiLeaks, Vatican Bank, etc. coming out of Rome, I think everyone needs to focus on *The Important Matters* of our Christian faith.  Setting even the Church Fathers aside, let’s all just preach the Gospel, in its fullness, to bring back morals in our country and in our homes.  Please?

Terah:

When the Church goes to the trouble of defining a dogma (as she has concerning the Perpetual Virginity of Mary), that means it’s important.  Instead of hastily ignoring something the Church urges us to pay attention to and assuming our limited understanding encompasses All That Really Matters, it is wise to ask instead, “Am I perhaps missing something when the Church is drawing my attention to it with such urgency?”  The odds are considerably higher that we are blind to something important than that the Church defines dogmas for the hell of it.

Hi Terah:

You’re right, we do need to try and turn our culture back to God. But far from hindering this, I would argue that belief in the Perpetual Virginity of Mary is what can help us get there! This dogma shows basically that there’s more to life than just pleasure, and God’s the one who’s in control. Exactly the things people today have denied, so I would say it matters quite a lot.

If you want a detailed explanation of this, All of Mr. Shea’s recent articles are excellent. Especially his first few.

Keep up the good fight!

-Robyn

I believe Mr. Shea is guided by the holy spirit.  Keep it up man.  You are using your gifts for a higher purpose.  You are truly blessed.

Terah:  Perpetual Virginity of Mary makes a great deal of difference to practicing Catholics. You need to think about it,if you value salvation.

Post a Comment

By submitting this form, you give The National Catholic Register permission to publish this comment. Comments will be published at our discretion, and may be edited for clarity and length. For best formatting, please limit your response to one paragraph and don't hit "enter" to force line breaks.

Name:

Email:

Write your comment:

Please enter the word you see in the image below:

     

Notify me of follow-up comments.

About Mark Shea

Mark Shea
  • Get the RSS feed
Mark P. Shea is a popular Catholic writer and speaker. The author of numerous books, his most recent work is The Work of Mercy (Servant) and The Heart of Catholic Prayer (Our Sunday Visitor). Mark contributes numerous articles to many magazines, including his popular column “Connecting the Dots” for the National Catholic Register.Mark is known nationally for his one minute “Words of Encouragement” on Catholic radio. He also maintains the Catholic and Enjoying It blog. He lives in Washington state with his wife, Janet, and their four sons.