Social networking sites such as Facebook are the principal focus of Pope Benedict XVI’s message for the 45th World Day of Social Communications published this morning, though of course none is mentioned explicitly by name.
The Pope’s message encourages all Christians to use this means of communication, and underlines its advantages for evangelization. But the message also highlights the risks that go with digital media.
The Holy Father reaffirms many of the benefits and dangers of the digital age, saying social networks are a wonderful way to build relationships and community. But he warns against replacing real friendships with virtual ones.
“In the final analysis,” the Pope writes, “the truth of Christ is the full and authentic response to that human desire for relationship, communion and meaning which is reflected in the immense popularity of social networks. Believers who bear witness to their most profound convictions greatly help prevent the web from becoming an instrument which depersonalizes people, attempts to manipulate them emotionally or allows those who are powerful to monopolize the opinions of others.”
At a Vatican press conference, Archbishop Claudio Maria Celli, president of the Pontifical Council for Social Communications, also said his dicastery was working on a set of guidelines with recommendations for appropriate style and behavior for Catholics online.
The text is worth reading in its entirety:
MESSAGE OF THE HOLY FATHER FOR THE 45TH WORLD DAY OF SOCIAL COMMUNICATIONS.
“Truth, proclamation and authenticity of life in the digital age”
Dear Brothers and Sisters,
On the occasion of the 45th World Day of Social Communications, I would like to share some reflections that are motivated by a phenomenon characteristic of our age: the emergence of the internet as a network for communication. It is an ever more commonly held opinion that, just as the Industrial Revolution in its day brought about a profound transformation in society by the modifications it introduced into the cycles of production and the lives of workers, so today the radical changes taking place in communications are guiding significant cultural and social developments. The new technologies are not only changing the way we communicate, but communication itself, so much so that it could be said that we are living through a period of vast cultural transformation. This means of spreading information and knowledge is giving birth to a new way of learning and thinking, with unprecedented opportunities for establishing relationships and building fellowship.
New horizons are now open that were until recently unimaginable; they stir our wonder at the possibilities offered by these new media and, at the same time, urgently demand a serious reflection on the significance of communication in the digital age. This is particularly evident when we are confronted with the extraordinary potential of the internet and the complexity of its uses. As with every other fruit of human ingenuity, the new communications technologies must be placed at the service of the integral good of the individual and of the whole of humanity. If used wisely, they can contribute to the satisfaction of the desire for meaning, truth and unity which remain the most profound aspirations of each human being.
In the digital world, transmitting information increasingly means making it known within a social network where knowledge is shared in the context of personal exchanges. The clear distinction between the producer and consumer of information is relativized and communication appears not only as an exchange of data, but also as a form of sharing. This dynamic has contributed to a new appreciation of communication itself, which is seen first of all as dialogue, exchange, solidarity and the creation of positive relations. On the other hand, this is contrasted with the limits typical of digital communication: the one-sidedness of the interaction, the tendency to communicate only some parts of one’s interior world, the risk of constructing a false image of oneself, which can become a form of self-indulgence.
Young people in particular are experiencing this change in communication, with all the anxieties, challenges and creativity typical of those open with enthusiasm and curiosity to new experiences in life. Their ever greater involvement in the public digital forum, created by the so-called social networks, helps to establish new forms of interpersonal relations, influences self-awareness and therefore inevitably poses questions not only of how to act properly, but also about the authenticity of one’s own being. Entering cyberspace can be a sign of an authentic search for personal encounters with others, provided that attention is paid to avoiding dangers such as enclosing oneself in a sort of parallel existence, or excessive exposure to the virtual world. In the search for sharing, for “friends”, there is the challenge to be authentic and faithful, and not give in to the illusion of constructing an artificial public profile for oneself.
The new technologies allow people to meet each other beyond the confines of space and of their own culture, creating in this way an entirely new world of potential friendships. This is a great opportunity, but it also requires greater attention to and awareness of possible risks. Who is my “neighbour” in this new world? Does the danger exist that we may be less present to those whom we encounter in our everyday life? Is there is a risk of being more distracted because our attention is fragmented and absorbed in a world “other” than the one in which we live? Do we have time to reflect critically on our choices and to foster human relationships which are truly deep and lasting? It is important always to remember that virtual contact cannot and must not take the place of direct human contact with people at every level of our lives.
In the digital age too, everyone is confronted by the need for authenticity and reflection. Besides, the dynamic inherent in the social networks demonstrates that a person is always involved in what he or she communicates. When people exchange information, they are already sharing themselves, their view of the world, their hopes, their ideals. It follows that there exists a Christian way of being present in the digital world: this takes the form of a communication which is honest and open, responsible and respectful of others. To proclaim the Gospel through the new media means not only to insert expressly religious content into different media platforms, but also to witness consistently, in one’s own digital profile and in the way one communicates choices, preferences and judgements that are fully consistent with the Gospel, even when it is not spoken of specifically. Furthermore, it is also true in the digital world that a message cannot be proclaimed without a consistent witness on the part of the one who proclaims it. In these new circumstances and with these new forms of expression, Christian are once again called to offer a response to anyone who asks for a reason for the hope that is within them (cf. 1 Pet 3:15).
The task of witnessing to the Gospel in the digital era calls for everyone to be particularly attentive to the aspects of that message which can challenge some of the ways of thinking typical of the web. First of all, we must be aware that the truth which we long to share does not derive its worth from its “popularity” or from the amount of attention it receives. We must make it known in its integrity, instead of seeking to make it acceptable or diluting it. It must become daily nourishment and not a fleeting attraction. The truth of the Gospel is not something to be consumed or used superficially; rather it is a gift that calls for a free response. Even when it is proclaimed in the virtual space of the web, the Gospel demands to be incarnated in the real world and linked to the real faces of our brothers and sisters, those with whom we share our daily lives. Direct human relations always remain fundamental for the transmission of the faith!
I would like then to invite Christians, confidently and with an informed and responsible creativity, to join the network of relationships which the digital era has made possible. This is not simply to satisfy the desire to be present, but because this network is an integral part of human life. The web is contributing to the development of new and more complex intellectual and spiritual horizons, new forms of shared awareness. In this field too we are called to proclaim our faith that Christ is God, the Saviour of humanity and of history, the one in whom all things find their fulfilment (cf. Eph 1:10). The proclamation of the Gospel requires a communication which is at once respectful and sensitive, which stimulates the heart and moves the conscience; one which reflects the example of the risen Jesus when he joined the disciples on the way to Emmaus (cf. Lk 24:13-35). By his approach to them, his dialogue with them, his way of gently drawing forth what was in their heart, they were led gradually to an understanding of the mystery.
In the final analysis, the truth of Christ is the full and authentic response to that human desire for relationship, communion and meaning which is reflected in the immense popularity of social networks. Believers who bear witness to their most profound convictions greatly help prevent the web from becoming an instrument which depersonalizes people, attempts to manipulate them emotionally or allows those who are powerful to monopolize the opinions of others. On the contrary, believers encourage everyone to keep alive the eternal human questions which testify to our desire for transcendence and our longing for authentic forms of life, truly worthy of being lived. It is precisely this uniquely human spiritual yearning which inspires our quest for truth and for communion and which impels us to communicate with integrity and honesty.
I invite young people above all to make good use of their presence in the digital world. I repeat my invitation to them for the next World Youth Day in Madrid, where the new technologies are contributing greatly to the preparations. Through the intercession of their patron Saint Francis de Sales, I pray that God may grant communications workers the capacity always to carry out their work conscientiously and professionally. To all, I willingly impart my Apostolic Blessing.
From the Vatican, 24 January 2011, Feast of Saint Francis de Sales.
****
From VIS:
Archbishop Celli affirmed that “this year’s Message has its starting point in a reality that is becoming increasingly evident today: the fact that an authentic cultural transformation is taking place as new technologies alter not only the way we communicate, but communication itself”.
“The new technologies”, he continued, “offer mankind great opportunities to come together, overcoming the limitations of distance and of culture of origin. They create the possibility to form new friendships, despite the inevitable risks”.
“The new relational opportunities offered by modern technology highlight how today it is possible not only to exchange information, but to share a world view, to share hopes and ideals”, the archbishop said.
“The Pope links three human aspects which are very important in modern life: digital communications, image of self and coherence of life. Communicational dynamics in the digital world create new ways to construct personal identity, and it is here that the Holy Father makes a call for coherence and authenticity”.
The Message, Archbishop Celli concluded, “speaks of a ‘Christian way’ of being present” in the digital world. “This is what makes the title of the Message meaningful, in the sense that the Christian testimony of Catholic professionals cannot be limited to simply dealing with religious topics, but is called to reveal itself in the form of concrete personal witness. Living a life that conforms to the Gospel is itself a form of proclamation, an explicit form of communication which makes the proclamation credible. More than ever, the requirement of making the Gospel known in all its integrity must become a distinctive sign of the digital age”.



Comments
Post a Comment
“Oh,what tangled webs they weave.” Why not create a Catholic web?
Dear Holy Father, via Archbishop Claudio Maria Celli:
Thank you for all that you have done and are doing for the world, by God’s grace.
I shall strive to make such use of Facebook that it should come within Archbishop Celli’s recommendations for appropriate style and behavior for Catholics online. Given conditions in America there may well not be time enough to wait for them.
Echoing part of your first encyclical in 2005, in 2008 you guided our bishops in the United States during your April visit thus:
“The goal of all our pastoral and catechetical work, the object of our preaching, and the focus of our sacramental ministry should be **to help people** establish and nurture that living relationship with “Christ Jesus, our hope” (1 Tim 1:1)”. That help is acutely needed to greatly reduce child-killing abortion in America.
You rightly cautioned against making our personal relationship a merely private one “at the expense of our calling to be members of a redeemed community”.
When I wrote you six days before your arrival in 2008, not soon enough for you to see it, I asked that the following thought provoking question be used broadly to cause people to develop *empathy* with Jesus who must witness in unspeakable sorrow ~3,300 of His children slaughtered—*daily* in the U.S. alone:
“Why wouldn’t Jesus feel even more strongly about His *Personal Treasures*, new human life?”
Because we humans feel quite strongly that our own material treasures be respected by others, there is good spiritual and psychological reason to expect that being catechized early-on with the introspective question above can reawaken and help strengthen us later in life by recalling our past heartfelt response of empathy with Jesus’ feelings—should we later face an unwanted pregnancy.
Christ’s grace can build upon even a dimmed yet not extinguished ember of love, respect and empathy within us to help us to defeat severe personal abortion-temptation:
http://www.michnews.com/cgi-bin/artman/exec/view.cgi/443/19939
In any future effort via Facebook, in addition to my explicit affirmation of “Respect Life” as always the Church’s primary dual teaching on protecting life—that is, the negative commandment to not kill AND the positive commandment to love all others, even our enemies (EV 41)—I intend to include what I believe the Holy Spirit wants us to get from Evangelium Vitae’s EV9, regarding grave Disrespect for God himself:
EV9: “Indeed “the blood is the life”, and life, especially human life, belongs only to God: for this reason whoever attacks human life, in some way attacks God himself.”
However, because God is invulnerable to attack, it seems the Holy Spirit wants us to see that we should develop **helpful counters** to such disrespect for God – counters built upon one’s consciously establishing and nurturing that vital *living relationship* you preach, Holy Father, and upon the raising of that introspective question above, about Jesus.
Hence an improved Pro-Life strategy should include both Respect Life and Respect God since they are harmonious and complementary, a well suited *pair* to meet the needs of us sheep. Since a proper personal relationship must involve two persons (one can be God) but not a person and, say, life, it is important to have *appropriate* developments in each, Respect Life (already well developed) and Respect God (only partially developed).
The pair could be shown as “Respect Life + Respect God” or something like “Respect Life, Respect God” or “Respect God, Respect Life”.
Though seldom mentioned with “Respect Life” alone, there exist sinless doubts that many have over personhood for early embryos. Having the *pair* to help troubled sheep means far less chance for rationalizing an abortion because of the doubts. As with other occasions of sin, it is best to first think of God and Mary instead of seeking refuge from culpability in one’s natural doubts.
People need to know that the “ensoulment moment”, while surely interesting to ponder, is unimportant “to have to know” because Respect for God is unconditionally owed to God no matter when He ensouls in God’s Image.
I believe ensoulment occurs at the very beginning but do not need confirmation before respecting both creature and Creator. Doubts or not, the wrongness of abortion, destructive embryonic stem cell research and IVF is in their challenge to God’s absolute dominion over human life.
Your Holiness, I believe that what I advocate herein is not against the Magisterium. It corresponds well with what you brought to our bishops and well with what you spoke in your homily on Feb. 6, 2006, marking Italy’s pro-life day:
http://www.catholicnews.com/data/stories/cns/0600682.htm
Its apt title is “To respect life, people must remember God created it, pope says”.
Because America has unprecedented problems and a very problematic governing mix there is not really that much useful time to try to gather support for improving Pro-Life strategy before the next elections in 2012. In reality it must be done soon, very much of it in 2011 because the USCCB’s November 2012 Meeting is after the election. So, this coming November *is* crucial for American Catholics.
Too many American Catholics learned too late in 2008 that “elections have consequences”. If Archbishop Celli does not respond to my letter, perhaps through my own bishop, I will feel comfortable that I am not going against the Magisterium. I will pursue several paths with this letter so that at least one path might work.
Thank you, Your Holiness, Archbishop Celli and others who may help, and Edward Pentin for his very timely article.
William F. Folger
Can not find to order Verbum Domini Bookwould
Yes, there should be a Catholic-based based website. Believe me, when it comes to “friendships” with strangers, I’m much better in cyberspace. I don’t have much luck with dealing with real people.
And what about us who don’t have Facebook, or even text. Are we going to be left out?
I have a Face Book website and use it for evangelization. It is at Reno Catholic Examiner, https://www.facebook.com/pages/Reno-Catholic-Examiner/114316721946057. My main page is at https://www.facebook.com/CharlieGillII.
In my articles at Reno Catholic Examiner I talk about the Creed, and the Ten Commandments in light of reading them in Hebrew and in Greek. Comments are appreciated.
Post a Comment
By submitting this form, you give The National Catholic Register permission to publish this comment. Comments will be published at our discretion, and may be edited for clarity and length. For best formatting, please limit your response to one paragraph and don't hit "enter" to force line breaks.