Go Forth and Multiply

Deacon Dean Condon and his wife, Janet, and their six children at All Saints Church in Corning, N.Y. in December 2006.
Deacon Dean Condon and his wife, Janet, and their six children at All Saints Church in Corning, N.Y. in December 2006. (photo: CNS)

Intelligentlife.com has posted an article called “Faith Equals Fertility” that probes the question of why religious believers are so much more fruitful than non-believers.

“Not only do denominations with traditionalist values tend to have higher birth rates than their more liberal co-religionists, but countries that are relatively secularized usually reproduce more slowly than countries that are more religious,” Anthony Gottlieb writes in his article.

“According to the World Bank, the nations with the largest proportions of unbelievers had an average annual population growth rate of just 0.7% in the period 1975-97, while the populations of the most religious countries grew three times as fast.”

Adds Gottlieb, “If they want to spread their gospel, then, one might half-seriously conclude that atheists and agnostics ought to focus on having more children, to help overcome their demographic disadvantage. Unfortunately for secularists, this may not work even as a joke. Nobody knows exactly why religion and fertility tend to go together.

“Conventional wisdom says that female education, urbanization, falling infant mortality, and the switch from agriculture to industry and services all tend to cause declines in both religiosity and birth rates. In other words, secularization and smaller families are caused by the same things. Also, many religions enjoin believers to marry early, abjure abortion and sometimes even contraception, all of which leads to larger families.

“But there may be a quite different factor at work as well. Having a large family might itself sometimes make people more religious, or make them less likely to lose their religion. Perhaps religion and fertility are linked in several ways at the same time.”

Go here to read Gottlieb’s entire article.

—Tom McFeely