Cardinals, Bishops Sign Appeal Against Coronavirus Restrictions

The signatories are said to include prelates, physicians, lawyers, journalists and academics.

Grass grows between cobblestones (sampietrini) at Piazza Navona Wednesday in Rome. Italy was the first country to impose a nationwide lockdown to stem the transmission of the novel coronavirus and its churches, restaurants, theaters and many other businesses remain closed.
Grass grows between cobblestones (sampietrini) at Piazza Navona Wednesday in Rome. Italy was the first country to impose a nationwide lockdown to stem the transmission of the novel coronavirus and its churches, restaurants, theaters and many other businesses remain closed. (photo: Photo by Elisabetta A. Villa/Getty Images)

Editor's note: This article has been updated after its initial publication, to include information regarding Cardinal Sarah’s denial that he signed the appeal.

ROME — An appeal signed by Cardinals Joseph Zen and Gerhard Müller and Bishop Joseph Strickland of Tyler, Texas, has been released expressing concern about measures being implemented to stem the coronavirus pandemic, and calling for “inalienable rights of citizens and their fundamental freedoms” to be respected. 

Cardinal Robert Sarah initially signed it but then changed his mind and withdrew his name (see tweets below).

The appeal, principally written by former apostolic nuncio Archbishop Carlo Viganò, comes from the website of an ad hoc organization that calls itself Veritas Liberabit Vos (the truth shall set you free), a line from the Gospel of John (8:32). It is not known who created the site.

Asked prior to the Register’s publication of the appeal about the authenticity of Cardinal Sarah’s participation, Archbishop Viganò told the Register he could confirm “100% that Cardinal Sarah signed it.”

On May 8, Archbishop Viganò released a statement explaining that although the cardinal initially agreed to sign the appeal, the cardinal later sent him a message after the appeal had been published, with a request to remove his name from the petition because of his current position within the curia. As Archbishop Viganò was busy working on preparing the document to be published, he said he did not see the cardinal's message until after the appeal had been sent to the press. 

Following the release of Archbishop Viganò's statement, Cardinal Sarah tweeted, "I will not speak to this petition, which today seems to occupy a lot of people. I leave to their conscience those who want to exploit it in one way or another. I decided not to sign this text. I fully accept my choice."

Addressed to Catholics and “all people of good will,” the signatories to the appeal argue that disproportionate and unjustifiable restrictions have been placed on the “exercise of freedom of worship, expression and movement.”

They also believe “official data” suggests some “powers” are fomenting panic, and imposing illiberal measures that are a “disturbing prelude to the realization of a world government beyond all control.”

They call on the scientific community, governments, the media, and Church leaders to take appropriate action, avoiding “subtle forms of dictatorship” and acknowledging that the “rights of God and the faithful are the supreme law of the Church.”

Among the more than 80 signatories are medical doctors (many of whom are from northern Italy, the region hardest hit by the pandemic), magistrates and lawyers, heads of associations and journalists. They comprise both Catholics and non-Catholics, including some atheists.

A late addition is environmental lawyer Robert Francis Kennedy Jr., son of the late Robert F. Kennedy and nephew of John F. Kennedy.   

Here below is the full text of the appeal and the initial full list of signatories. Anyone sympathetic to the appeal is invited to sign it:

APPEAL

FOR THE CHURCH AND THE WORLD

to Catholics and all people of good will

Veritas liberabit vos.

Jn 8:32

In this time of great crisis, we Pastors of the Catholic Church, by virtue of our mandate, consider it our sacred duty to make an Appeal to our Brothers in the Episcopate, to the Clergy, to Religious, to the holy People of God and to all men and women of good will. This Appeal has also been undersigned by intellectuals, doctors, lawyers, journalists and professionals who agree with its content, and may be undersigned by those who wish to make it their own.

The facts have shown that, under the pretext of the Covid-19 epidemic, the inalienable rights of citizens have in many cases been violated and their fundamental freedoms, including the exercise of freedom of worship, expression and movement, have been disproportionately and unjustifiably restricted. Public health must not, and cannot, become an alibi for infringing on the rights of millions of people around the world, let alone for depriving the civil authority of its duty to act wisely for the common good. This is particularly true as growing doubts emerge from several quarters about the actual contagiousness, danger and resistance of the virus. Many authoritative voices in the world of science and medicine confirm that the media’s alarmism about Covid-19 appears to be absolutely unjustified.

We have reason to believe, on the basis of official data on the incidence of the epidemic as related to the number of deaths, that there are powers interested in creating panic among the world’s population with the sole aim of permanently imposing unacceptable forms of restriction on freedoms, of controlling people and of tracking their movements. The imposition of these illiberal measures is a disturbing prelude to the realization of a world government beyond all control.

We also believe that in some situations the containment measures that were adopted, including the closure of shops and businesses, have precipitated a crisis that has brought down entire sectors of the economy. This encourages interference by foreign powers and has serious social and political repercussions. Those with governmental responsibility must stop these forms of social engineering, by taking measures to protect their citizens whom they represent, and in whose interests they have a serious obligation to act. Likewise, let them help the family, the cell of society, by not unreasonably penalizing the weak and elderly, forcing them into a painful separation from their loved ones. The criminalization of personal and social relationships must likewise be judged as an unacceptable part of the plan of those who advocate isolating individuals in order to better manipulate and control them.

We ask the scientific community to be vigilant, so that cures for Covid-19 are offered in honesty for the common good. Every effort must be made to ensure that shady business interests do not influence the choices made by government leaders and international bodies. It is unreasonable to penalize those remedies that have proved to be effective, and are often inexpensive, just because one wishes to give priority to treatments or vaccines that are not as good, but which guarantee pharmaceutical companies far greater profits, and exacerbate public health expenditures. Let us also remember, as Pastors, that for Catholics it is morally unacceptable to develop or use vaccines derived from material from aborted fetuses.

We also ask government leaders to ensure that forms of control over people, whether through tracking systems or any other form of location-finding, are rigorously avoided. The fight against Covid-19, however serious, must not be the pretext for supporting the hidden intentions of supranational bodies that have very strong commercial and political interests in this plan. In particular, citizens must be given the opportunity to refuse these restrictions on personal freedom, without any penalty whatsoever being imposed on those who do not wish to use vaccines, contact tracking or any other similar tool. Let us also consider the blatant contradiction of those who pursue policies of drastic population control and at the same time present themselves as the savior of humanity, without any political or social legitimacy. Finally, the political responsibility of those who represent the people can in no way be left to “experts” who can indeed claim a kind of immunity from prosecution, which is disturbing to say the least.

We strongly urge those in the media to commit themselves to providing accurate information and not penalizing dissent by resorting to forms of censorship, as is happening widely on social media, in the press and on television. Providing accurate information requires that room be given to voices that are not aligned with a single way of thinking. This allows citizens to consciously assess the facts, without being heavily influenced by partisan interventions. A democratic and honest debate is the best antidote to the risk of imposing subtle forms of dictatorship, presumably worse than those our society has seen rise and fall in the recent past.

Finally, as Pastors responsible for the flock of Christ, let us remember that the Church firmly asserts her autonomy to govern, worship, and teach. This autonomy and freedom are an innate right that Our Lord Jesus Christ has given her for the pursuit of her proper ends. For this reason, as Pastors we firmly assert the right to decide autonomously on the celebration of Mass and the Sacraments, just as we claim absolute autonomy in matters falling within our immediate jurisdiction, such as liturgical norms and ways of administering Communion and the Sacraments. The State has no right to interfere, for any reason whatsoever, in the sovereignty of the Church. Ecclesiastical authorities have never refused to collaborate with the State, but such collaboration does not authorize civil authorities to impose any sort of ban or restriction on public worship or the exercise of priestly ministry. The rights of God and of the faithful are the supreme law of the Church, which she neither intends to, nor can, abdicate. We ask that restrictions on the celebration of public ceremonies be removed.

We should like to invite all people of good will not to shirk their duty to cooperate for the common good, each according to his or her own state and possibilities and in a spirit of fraternal charity. The Church desires such cooperation, but this cannot disregard either a respect for natural law or a guarantee of individual freedoms. The civil duties to which citizens are bound imply the State’s recognition of their rights.

We are all called to assess the current situation in a way consistent with the teaching of the Gospel. This means taking a stand: either with Christ or against Christ. Let us not be intimidated or frightened by those who would have us believe that we are a minority: Good is much more widespread and powerful than the world would have us believe. We are fighting against an invisible enemy that seeks to divide citizens, to separate children from their parents, grandchildren from their grandparents, the faithful from their pastors, students from teachers, and customers from vendors. Let us not allow centuries of Christian civilization to be erased under the pretext of a virus, and an odious technological tyranny to be established, in which nameless and faceless people can decide the fate of the world by confining us to a virtual reality. If this is the plan to which the powers of this earth intend to make us yield, know that Jesus Christ, King and Lord of History, has promised that “the gates of Hell shall not prevail” (Mt 16:18).

Let us entrust government leaders and all those who rule over the fate of nations to Almighty God, that He may enlighten and guide them in this time of great crisis. May they remember that, just as the Lord will judge us Pastors for the flock which he has entrusted to us, so will He also judge government leaders for the peoples whom they have the duty to defend and govern.

With faith, let us beseech the Lord to protect the Church and the world. May the Blessed Virgin, Help of Christians, crush the head of the ancient Serpent and defeat the plans of the children of darkness.

8 May 2020

Our Lady of the Rosary of Pompeii

 

List of Signatories

PRELATES

Mgr. Carlo Maria Viganò, Archbishop, Apostolic Nuncio

Cdl Gerhard Ludwig Mueller, Prefect emeritus of Congregation of the Doctrine of the Faith

Cdl Joseph Zen Ze-kiun, Bishop emeritus of Hong Kong

Cdl Janis Pujats, Archbishop emeritus of Riga, Latvia

Mgr Luigi Negri, Archbishop emeritus of Ferrara-Comacchio

Mgr Joseph Strickland, Bishop of Tyler, Texas

Mgr Thomas Peta, Metropolitan Archbishop of Astana, Kazakhstan

Mgr Athanasius Schneider, Auxiliary Bishop of Astana, Kazakhstan

Mgr Jan Pawel Lenga, Archbishop emeritus of Karaganda, Kazakhstan

Mgr Rene Henry Gracida, Bishop emeritus of Corpus Christi, Texas

Mgr Andreas Laun, Auxiliary Bishop of Salzburg, Austria

Franciscan Friar of the Immaculate Father Serafino Lanzetta, theologian

Father Alfredo Maria Morselli, theologian, Archdiocese of Bologna

Father Curzio Nitoglia, Theologian, Society of St. Pius X

 

JOURNALISTS, EDITORS, WRITERS

Aldo Maria Valli, journalist

Magdi Cristiano Allam, writer

Giulio Meotti, journalist

Marco Tosatti, journalist

Claudio Messora, director Byoblu.com

Robert Moynihan, writer, journalist

Jeanne Smits, journalist

Olivier Figueras, journalist

Cesare Sacchetti, journalist

Giorgio Nicolini, director of Tele Maria

Michael J. Matt, editor The Remnant

John-Henry Westen, co-founder, editor-in-chief LifeSiteNews.com

Vittoria Alliata di Villafranca, journalist and writer

Maria Guarini, editor

Francesco Lamendola António Carlos de Azeredo, editor

José Narciso Pinto Soares, editorial counselor

Massimo Rodolfi Riccardo Zenobi, writer

Danilo Quinto, writer

Olivier Valette, writer

 

DOCTORS, IMMUNOLOGISTS, VIROLOGISTS, RESEARCHERS

Dr. Stefano Montanari, scientific director Nanodiagnostics laboratory, Modena

Dr. Antonietta Gatti, research manager, Nanodiagnostics laboratory, Modena

Alessandro Meluzzi, psychiatrist

Dr. Anna Rita Iannetti, doctor, PNEI and biointegrated medicine

Dr. Fabrizio Giudici, orthopedic traumatologist

Dr. Rosa Maria Roccaforte, cardiologist

Dr. Silvana De Mari

Dr. Maria Grazia Sordi, psychologist

Dr. Roberto Marrocchesi, nutritionist

Dr. Mario Sinisi

Dr. Antonio Marcantonio

 

LAWYERS

Robert Francis Kennedy Jr., environmental lawyer

Angelo Giorgianni, judge

João Freire de Andrade, jurist

Francesco Fontana

Luigi Valenzise

Fabio Candalino

Luca Di FazioMassimo Meridio

Lawyer Gianni T. Battisti

Piero Peracchio

Paola Bragazzi

Luís Freire de Andrade

Heitor A. Buchaul

Maître Olivier Bonnet

 

LECTORS, TEACHERS AND PROFESSIONALS

Professor Vittorio Sgarbi, art critic, essayist

Professor Matteo D’Amico

Professor Mafalda Miranda Barbosa

Professor Francesca Maimone

Professor Martino Mora, philosopher

Professor Massimo Viglione, historian and essayist

Prof. Elisabetta Sala, teacher and writer

Alessandro Peracchio

Luca Scantamburlo

Prof. Rosa Maria Bellarmino

Steven Mosher, president Population Research Institute

Professor Emeterio Ferrés Arrospide, Coimbra University

Professor Ibsen Noronha

Professor Amadeu Teixeira Fernandes, Georgetown University

José Filipe Sepúlveda da Fonseca

Alfonso Martone, CNR Italy

Dr Luís Ferrand d’Almeida

Roberto Imparato

 

ASSOCIATIONS

Atman Association — President Manuela Baccin

Riprendiamoci Il Pianeta Association — President Magda Piacentini

Movimento 3V — Vaccini Vogliamo

Verità — Secretary Luca

Teodori Libera Scelta Association — President Alessandra Bocchi

Iustitia in Veritate Association — Directors

Una Vox Association — President Calogero Cammarata

Comitato Famiglia e Vita — President Franco Rebecchi Confederazione dei Triarii

AURET, Autismo, Ricerca e Terapie — President Lawyer Roberto Mastalia

Vita al Microscopio Association — President Nino Ferri

Texas Right to Life — Jim Graham

Cleveland Right to Life — Molly Smith

Amy Coney Barrett in 2018

Judge Amy Coney Barrett Confirmation Hearings (Oct. 17)

Judge Amy Coney Barrett this week faced the senate judiciary committee where she was questioned in four days of hearings. How did the 7th circuit court judge, Notre dame law professor and mom of seven fair? Andrea Picciotti-Bayer, a legal analyst for EWTN News, gives us her insights on Judge Barrett’s case for herself as Supreme Court jurist. And then, the Register’s Alyssa Murphy talks about the buzz of the week on the Catholic web.