Print Article | Email Article | Write To Us

Reader Julianne Wiley writes…

Friday, November 26, 2010 3:00 AM Comments (6)

I just gave a talk on Elizabeth Anscombe to my parish Council of Catholic Women, and it was a big success!  I am so excited!  None of these women had ever heard of her before, and going into it I had my doubts that I could win them over, since the ones on the Right accept the Bomb, and the ones on the Left accept Abortion (you know the problem) and none have much use for academic philosophy.

BUT!  I tried to craft the talk so EA would capture their interest and sympathy before I detonated the stuff that would blow their minds—- and I think it worked!  I think they all ended up “on her side,” and wanting to know lots more about her and her tremendous ethical judgments so important for our day.

I am sending you three attachments: the text of the talk itself, the hand-out on the exceptionless norm against killing the innocent, and the prayer for EA’s beatification.

Could you put something about this in your blog?  I would love to send these resources to anybody who asks for them,

I hope somebody will do a good popular biography of EA.  Soon.  I mean ~really~ soon. We need a powerful infusion of the wisdom and inspiration that is meant to be her gift to us all.

For those who are interested, Gertrude Elizabeth Margaret Anscombe was one of the greatest Catholic philosophers of the 20th Century.  She was a convert and had one of the toughest minds in the world, combined with a Catholic faith that was childlike in the best sense. (I remember reading an article about her somewhere and the amazingly simple and gentle catechesis she gave her seven children about how to behave at Mass and what was going on when the consecration occurred:

It is easiest to tell what transubstantiation is by saying this: little children should be taught about it as early as possible. Not of course using the word “transubstantiation”, because it is not a little child’s word. But the thing can be taught, and it is best taught at mass at the consecration, the one part where a small child should be got to fix its attention on what is going on. I mean a child that is beginning to speak, one that understands enough language to be told and to tell you things that have happened and to follow a simple story. Such a child can be taught then by whispering to it such things as: “Look! Look what the priest is doing ... He is saying Jesus’ words that change the bread into Jesus’ body. Now he’s lifting it up. Look! Now bow your head and say ‘My Lord and my God’,” and then “Look, now he’s taken hold of the cup. He’s saying the words that change the wine into Jesus’ blood. Look up at the cup. Now bow your head and say ‘We believe, we adore your precious blood, O Christ of God’.” [The cry of the Ethiopians at the consecration of the chalice.] This need not be disturbing to the surrounding people.

She once debated C.S. Lewis and by universal acclamation, she cleaned his clock so badly that he had to revise his book Miracles in order to take into account the points she made.

One of her principal contributions to Catholic moral theology was her coinage of the term “consequentialism”, which is a three dollar word to describe the moral heresy that the ends justify the means.  She did not, of course, invent that idea, merely the term to describe it.  The idea is already found in St. Paul, when he mocks the assertion, “Let us do evil that good may come of it” and states bluntly that those who say such things deserve condemnation.

Because of her courageous opposition to consequentialism (subsequently condemned in Veritatis Splendor), Anscombe “scandalized liberal colleagues with articles defending the Roman Catholic Church’s opposition to contraception in the 1960s and early 1970s. Later in life, she was arrested twice while protesting outside an abortion clinic in Britain, after abortion had been legalized”.  And because she was a consistent thinker, she likewise scandalized the Right by protesting against Oxford’s decision to grant an honorary degree to Harry S. Truman, whom she denounced as a mass murderer for his use of atomic bombs at Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

She was a thoroughly Catholic convert who is one of the Church’s great ornaments in a very dark time.  I hope they canonize her someday.

If you want a copy of Julianne’s materials, email her here.  Anscombe is somebody worth getting to know.

 

Filed under mailbag

Comments

Post a Comment

G.E. Anscombe is always an inspiration.  Congrats, Julianne, on the success of all the great work you’re doing!  May your work on her biography prosper.

Couldn’t resist throwing in a comment about the a-bomb, could you? You’re on the verge of becoming tiresome on the issue.

Trey:

Your remark is the equivalent of saying, “You just couldn’t talk about Lincoln without dragging in the Civil War.”  A discussion of Anscombe is unintelligible without discussing her position on the A Bomb, just as it is unintelligible without discussion of abortion.  Sadly for you and for many other tribal Catholics of the Right, Anscombe was a consistent thinker and didn’t believe that opposition to abortion took away the sins of the world.  She believed that if you embrace the consequentialist argument for aborting thousands of Japanese children in their beds, you also embraced the arguments for aborting millions of children in the womb.  She rejected the deliberate murder of innocent human beings whether it was celebrated by the Left or by the star-spangled American Right.  May God send us many more like her.

I strongly urge Trey to read “Song for Nagasaki” by Paul Glynn - see here http://www.ignatius.com/Products/SNAG-P/a-song-for-nagasaki.aspx

Military/terrorist attacks on civilian populations are despicable at every level.  If the “Western Alliance” had not aborted from its education curricula the reason for existence, we wouldn’t have multitudes hooked on drugs & leading hedonistic lives, & those supposedly governing us blaming Afghanistan and Iraq for our problems. 

Whether we like it or not the USA, Russia & China are empires. French novelist Francois Mauriac writing in “The Stumbling Block” puts it this way.
“These ‘republics’ resemble one another insofar as all are incarnations of the same superstition, the same idolatry - technical efficiency and the pre-eminence of economics.  These ‘empires’ fail to understand - just because - they are empires, that system of charity in which the individual christian, provided he can maintain himself in it, may feel certain of being invincible ...”

It should be added that Anscombe was a rather difficult and eccentric personality, certainly not a saint although basically a good person, a fact about her that is still remembered in philosophical circles. The idea that any Catholic who has done interesting and positive things is a candidate for canonisation needs to be rejected; it distorts people’s idea of sainthood. In any case it is Anscombe’s ideas rather than her life that are significant, something she would have been the first to insist on.

What John Lamont said.

Post a Comment

By submitting this form, you give The National Catholic Register permission to publish this comment. Comments will be published at our discretion, and may be edited for clarity and length. For best formatting, please limit your response to one paragraph and don't hit "enter" to force line breaks.

Name:

Email:

Write your comment:

Please enter the word you see in the image below:

     

Notify me of follow-up comments.

About Mark Shea

Mark Shea
  • Get the RSS feed
Mark P. Shea is a popular Catholic writer and speaker. The author of numerous books, his most recent work is The Work of Mercy (Servant) and The Heart of Catholic Prayer (Our Sunday Visitor). Mark contributes numerous articles to many magazines, including his popular column “Connecting the Dots” for the National Catholic Register.Mark is known nationally for his one minute “Words of Encouragement” on Catholic radio. He also maintains the Catholic and Enjoying It blog. He lives in Washington state with his wife, Janet, and their four sons.