Pregnancy Centers Fight California ‘Censorship’ of Abortion Pill Reversal Drug
Judges question California’s ‘state interest.’
Judges question California’s ‘state interest.’
Advocate of pro-life treatment criticizes stayed state law that seeks to end the practice.
COMMENTARY: Politically charged reporting that followed in the wake of these tragic events failed to examine the true reasons these women didn’t receive proper medical care.
Dr. George Delgado says he has the statistics that prove otherwise.
Abortion pill reversal works by administering progesterone in high doses after a woman has ingested mifepristone; the hormone is meant to counteract the effects of the abortive drug.
The case revolves around mifepristone, a widely used drug that is primarily manufactured by Danco Laboratories.
A Denver-area Catholic medical clinic can continue to help women reverse unwanted chemical abortions.
Dede Chism and Abby Sinnett, who run the Denver-area Bella Health and Wellness, are arguing that a new Colorado law banning abortion pill reversal impedes the First Amendment rights of their clients and their medical practice.
The lawsuit accuses the pregnancy centers of violating California’s False Advertising Law and Unfair Competition Law.
'Women should be properly informed, as a matter of course, that the baby’s death is not inevitable after the first pill is taken.'
Subscriber Service CenterAlready a subscriber? Renew or manage your subscription or gift subscription.
My AccountSubscribe and SAVE at just $1.25 per issue!Start your Register subscription today.
Subscribe NowGive a Gift SubscriptionBless friends, family or clergy with a gift of the Register.
Order NowOrder Bulk SubscriptionsGet a discount on 6 or more copies sent to your parish, organization or school.
Order NowSign-up for E-NewsletterGet Register Updates sent daily or weeklyto your inbox.
Sign Up