that some ideas are so foolish, only an intellectual could believe them.

Here is Peter Singer, Brilliant Philosopher, on the solution—one might even call it the “final solution” for climate change:

Here is a thought experiment to test our attitudes to this view. Most thoughtful people are extremely concerned about climate change. Some stop eating meat, or flying abroad on vacation, in order to reduce their carbon footprint. But the people who will be most severely harmed by climate change have not yet been conceived. If there were to be no future generations, there would be much less for us to feel to guilty about.

So why don’t we make ourselves the last generation on earth? If we would all agree to have ourselves sterilized then no sacrifices would be required — we could party our way into extinction!

Of course, it would be impossible to get agreement on universal sterilization, but just imagine that we could. Then is there anything wrong with this scenario? Even if we take a less pessimistic view of human existence than Benatar, we could still defend it, because it makes us better off — for one thing, we can get rid of all that guilt about what we are doing to future generations — and it doesn’t make anyone worse off, because there won’t be anyone else to be worse off.

Singer is an evil man.  His ideas are the apotheosis of the culture of death’s willingness to sacrifice literally everything on the altar of pleasure and self.  God have mercy on him.  He seeks the peace of the grave.  It’s no wonder he feels such a strong desire to get rid of the burden of guilt.