I believe that soros, and the others like him who involve themselves in the NewWorldOrder crowd are money laundering figures. it is well documented that the Federal Reserve, a banking cartel, has total control of the money supply. It is run by elites who have a napoleon complex and want to reorder society to their own designs. Guys like Soros “make” a lot of money but I would not be surprised if “make” actually means they are really just spending outlets for money siphoned out of the market by insider trading, “debt assets” or derivatives. It is a shell game. You put real money in, they fabricate and inflate false assets on top of your investment, then they sell of the “toxic” asset and cash out, your portfolio is left with the “paper” asset that has now been devalued, and presto change-o, you have been robbed but think you have just been unlucky in a market down turn. (well, that is one way to look at it I suppose.) Soros, and others like him, happen to make these really smart buys and sells, (well, duh, they are in on the fix.) and comes out with all the money under his shell! Of coarse it isn’t really his to do what he wants with it. He only has it because he is playing ball with his cartel brethren. As a collective they have an agenda with the money under his shell and it gets “donated” or invested in the instruments of the groups agenda. Then agenda is to disorder and reorder society to their liking.

Oh, I forgot, You can also fight it by quiting your 401k, get out of the stock market, and avoid using the larger banks like Citi, Chase, etc. God gave us Gold and Silver, use it. It took me a while to finally realize there was nothing much to gain in a 401k and i also found out that they really don’t want you out. I have esentially lost what i had in, not much, but you are not allowed to “cash out.” you have to retire, get fired, quite, or die. At least stop putting money in. Once you put it in it is used by people like soro. In addition to that, you have little idea what kind of un-catholic enterprises it will be invested in. I am out and happy for it.

I hesitate to post this after the previous post but here goes - do not dismiss the power of the ‘widow’s mite’.  I know how hard it is; raising 11 children myself on only my dh’s income.  And I would never recommend taking food out of your children’s mouth but taking it out of one’s own can be powerful.  Saying ‘no’ to one take-out coffee a day can make a difference.  Every good charity will happily take whatever you can offer - drop off a book of stamps at the local pregnancy center and see their smile if you don’t believe me.  Every dollar - even if it is just a dollar - does help.  The Lord commended the widow for giving just a ‘mite’, the smallest amount.  How many of us dismiss the little bit we could give because it is not as visibly impressive as Soros’?  At least our money was gained without any moral implications.

Michael’s remarks are to put it mildly bizarre. Cartel’s? Money laundering?

Human Rights Watch is a legitimate organization that has many programs designed to help people in many countries who are being persecuted by dictatorial governments.  Bravo to Soros for supporting the organization,even if you don’t like some of its programs

John,
you are really funny. Bravo to PolPot, Stalin, and Hitler too, after all, Hitler was Time Magazine man of the year in 1938. And yes, a cartel. Bizarre is right. The definition of a cartel is monopolist partnership between a private group, the bankers, and a government. The federal reserve is a group of banks in cooperation with the government. the banks get leagal sanction to print money. IE steel through inflation. and the governments get to borrow the printed money and commit you to pay the interest. look into it. it isn’t even a conspiracy, it is right out there in the open. they just don’t talk it up much lest you get concerned about it.

Oh John, you defend the indefensible through the lens of your moral relativism.

Human right to kill his children in the womb is not a right but a devilish aspiration.  If George Soro wants to donate for human rights , well and good, but it can direct that it should be used with a spiritual and humane thought

Sorry, but John is correct. Although the work done by Human Rights Watch to legalize, promote access to and “normalize” abortion is morally reprehensible, this is only a small part of the work they do. Most of their work is directed at opposing political, ethnic and religious persecution and defending human rights.

It is for each of us to weigh whether the harm done by HRW’s promotion of abortion outweighs the good they do through all of their many other efforts in defense of human rights and human dignity, lest we pull up the wheat along with the chaff.

Ok, lets not get distracted by John and Chesire11. The Catholic faith, the magistarium, the pope, they define Catholic. That is what it is to be Catholic. Sign up or sign off. It really is that simple. If you want to throw your weight behind George soros and his ilk,and you find the human sacrifice to be acceptable, go ahead. You are not Catholic, just as you are not a fish. You can call yourself a fish all you want, but you are still not a fish. You don’t have the “fishness” to be a fish. Support Soros and find abortion promotion acceptable because you think it is just a bit of chaff, then you don’t have “Catholicness”. You are not Catholic, no matter how much you say you are. For the rest of us who are or try really hard, (genuinely) to be Catholic, Danielle Bean has some good advise for doing your part to impare soros the monster.I suggest that further comments talk around and ignore John and Chesire11. They arent catholic and might as well be shills for soros. “shake the sand of your sandels and carry on.”

Michael,

Upon receiving the Sacrament of Confirmation, a person’s soul is imprinted with the indelible seal of the Holy Spirit. Fortunately, sacraments can’t be “undone.” People may sometimes try to pretend them away, but just like Marriage, the seal of Confirmation can’t be dissolved. Once confirmed Catholic, a person is ETERNALLY Catholic. You don’t take my word for it, though, the Catholic faith, the Magisterium, and the pope, all define Catholic in these terms.

We are all sinners in need of redemption and are both members of the Mystical Body of Christ. It is, therefore, profoundly unseemly for us to engage in a Pharasitical debate about which of us is more authentically Catholic than the other, or which of us shall be first in His Kingdom.

But to return to the subject at hand, I don’t believe I ever suggested that promoting abortion is either acceptable or insignificant. (In point of fact, I seem to recall describing it as “morally reprehensible.”) What I did state (rather clearly) is that we must weigh the unquestionable good achieved by HRW or any other group against the also unquestionable harm they do. We are not judging their souls or forgiving their sins, we are trying to determine whether monetarily supporting their central mission of opposing things like murder, rape, religious persecution, ethnic cleansing, etc… alleviates more harm than in caused by their support for abortion.

As to the state of George Soros’ soul, that is not for me to judge.

Incidentally, I do agree with Michael that Danielle Been’s suggestion to oppose abortion through prayer, sacrifice and witness are excellent, to which I would add trust in Our Lady, though whose intercession the scourge of abortion will be abolished.

You can turn your back on your promised salvation even if you have been confirmed. it is not Catholic to behave in a manner inconsistant with the Faith. Faith without works/ works without faith. Either is dead. To your point about the greater good; the end does not justify the means. The promotion of abortion, while doing other “good” deeds doesn’t mean you can overlook the abortion because something else is, in your opinion, a greater good. There is no reason to promote the “good” through a means that promotes evil when you have organizations in the Church that can promote the good without the evil. But again, you have to be carefull because there are plenty of catholic organizations with the same attitude of the end justifies the means. If you look at history, the people who “break a few eggs” never actually make an omlet.

Another way Catholics, or anyone that believes in the sancity of life, can serve is by volunteering at Birthright or any organization that supports the right to life.

This a most worthy endeavor, and I’m glad that God lead me to it!

So I take it that you wish to recant your previous claim that I am not Catholic, preferring instead to argue simply that I am not a “good” Catholic – at least not as good a Catholic as you? Well at least it’s not heretical, so that’s some progress, I suppose.

The problem with your “ends vs. means” argument is that it doesn’t really fit this scenario. When Machiavelli argued that “the ends justify the means,” he was saying that an intrinsically evil action could be “justified” or rendered morally neutral or even virtuous if the ends achieved were sufficiently good.

Giving away money is not in and of itself an evil act, therefore, it does not require justification. Giving money away could be either a moral or immoral action, it’s morality is contingent upon the ends achieved with the contribution. For instance, I think we could agree that it would be immoral to make a donation to the Ku Klux Klan. Conversely, a charitable donation to Aid to the Church in Need, would be a virtuous act.

The problem is that the means (donating funds to HRW) has more than one end - one good, the other evil. It is for the individual to discern which end eclipses the other. If a Catholic makes a contribution to HRW unaware of their support for abortion, they are guilty of ignorance. If a Catholic makes a contribution to HRW in full knowledge of the nature and scope of its support for abortion, but has judged that support to be either inconsequential in its effect or of less consequence and scale than the good works it advances, then at worst, he is guilty of poor judgment.

And if a Catholic does not make any donation to HRW, but argues that individuals must carefully weigh ALL of the consequences of their actions, it does not make him a less Catholic than you.

...incidentally, that comment about your progress away from heresy was not meant to be taken seriously, it was made purely in jest.

The Federal Reserve refuses to be audited, and only Congressman Ron Paul from TX is pushing to get a public audit done.
George Soros has and will continue to fund “FAKE Catholic” organizations.  Soros also supported Obama on his “move-on” web site, etc.  He uses Saul Alinksy tactics. Alinsky viewed revolution as a slow, patient process. “The trick was to penetrate existing institutions such as churches, unions and political parties….”.

“Giving away money is not in and of itself an evil act, therefore, it does not require justification. Giving money away could be either a moral or immoral action, it’s morality is contingent upon the ends achieved with the contribution. For instance, I think we could agree that it would be immoral to make a donation to the Ku Klux Klan. Conversely, a charitable donation to Aid to the Church in Need, would be a virtuous act.

The problem is that the means (donating funds to HRW) has more than one end - one good, the other evil. It is for the individual to discern which end eclipses the other.”

This is the same sort of cockeyed logic that enabled priests to take Mafia dons’ contributions to church causes and has made the Church, in many areas, laughable. Giving money is NOT a neutral act if you, in ANY sense, and in ANY way, know that ANY of it is going to a cause that kills. Period.

The problem is, most of us donate money without knowing how many hands it goes through…and inadvertently, we may be supporting evil without knowing it. No one can know everything, and to try to screen every single penny you give everywhere would be a full-time job and then some. But here, right in front of you, is clear evidence that this money is going to an organization that’s tainted. If HRW wants to truly be in the HUMAN rights business, it will protect ALL humans, especially the unborn. No amount of “good” done on one side eliminates the pure evil on the other. Period. It’s clear as the nose on one’s face where this money should NOT go, until HRW cleans up its act and refuses to put one category of “human rights” aside—the right to life—while pleading with the other side that they’re “doing so much good.” Wrong. For as long as they support the culture of death, the net result is dead babies. That’s never right, and when it’s right in front of your face, tapdancing around it by pleading “but they do so much other good” is only deceiving yourself.

Or don’t you know the old joke about Mussolini? :-)

JB

chesire11,
Your possition is relativist. You would defend the KKK then if they also gave some money to support the programs that Soros supports; the ones you deam meritable. You will just have to weigh that against the fact that they like to lynch a few color folks every now and again. Well, you probably wouldn’t defend the KKK, even under those circumstances, but would be content with the moral contradiction. Why the meandering distortions of my comments? I didn’t say you were a good catholic or a bad catholic. I didn’t comment on you at all. I was speaking of what is and is not by definition Catholic. It is or it ain’t. Contorsions won’t change that. might make it harder to see or decern the truth of things but it won’t make relativism objective or honest.

Good article.  Back to basics.

To John and Chesire…here’s the problem with what you’re saying.  You give high marks to HRW for defending lives on some occasions, which in your mind is reason enough to excuse their assistance in terminating lives in other scenarios (i.e., abortion).  How do you decide which lives are more valuable?  Either you protect ALL life or you’re protecting none.  It is HRW’s support of abortion (i.e., their de-valuing of life) that allows persecution to continue in some parts of the world. 

In summary, with one hand HRW “helps” combat persecution and with the other they “help kill” and encourage the erroneous world view that some people have the “right” to decide who lives and who dies.  Hypocritical at best…deadly at worst.

Without even bringing into question how Catholic or not you are - your opinion seems to lack common sense. It’s like saying Charles Manson yes is a murderer, but hey isn’t it great how much he did to help all of the young people that were so lost on their own by creating a “family.”  Just very twisted logic in your comments about HRW and Soros.

Sam,
i said far more then was needed. well done, you nailed it. Great annalogy by the way. Manson, I love it. lol.

Janny-

If giving money is a morally indefensible act if you know that, in any sense, in any way any of it is going to a cause that kills, then I would be curious to know whether or not you pay taxes. We clearly know that a significant amount of money we pay in taxes funded Iraq War as well as the war in Afghanistan, correct?

Regarding HRW, if HRW were in the business of providing abortions, I would be far more likely to agree with your argument. However, the only offenses indicated by the links provided in Danielle Bean’s commentary, are issuing reports about the availability of abortions in various countries and having a pro-abortion viewpoint.  Perusing their website, they don’t appear to do much of anything except issue reports and occasional press releases about those reports. That’s pretty weak tea – Planned Parenthood they ain’t, lol!

lol. Chesire11,
Giving money isn’t the issue. You should be a better steward of it and make sure it isn’t going to someone who will buy a murder with it. Do some research on Soros and his NWO friends. bad dudes. Worst of the worst.
You don’t “give” money to taxes, it is taken. And I minimize my fleecing as best i can. No, not one red scent of your income tax, or mine goes to pay for Iraq. Every single penny goes directly to the Fed to pay the interest on the money that the Government borrowed from the Fed. So we clearly don’t know, that a significant amount of the taxes we pay funds war, do we? Not to mention the huge difference between someone stealing from you and funding violence as opposed to you willingly giving them the money to do so.

Sam, again, i am wordy. Could you please chime in and sum it up for me? :)

Michael, my position is hardly relativist. I decry HRW’s support for abortion and applaud their support for human rights. There’s nothing relative about that. (Relativism would be if I argued that there can be some situations in which abortion could be morally acceptable.) What we are discussing is the judgment of whether it is moral or immoral to contribute money to an organization like HRW. If the KKK used some of their funds to feed the poor, I would certainly defend that. I would not contribute money to them nor defend them as an organization because the harm that they do (lynching people, etc…) far outweighs the good they did in their hypothetical feeding of the poor.

(BTW, I didn’t distort your comments, I simply pointed out where your “ends vs. means” argument fell apart.)

Second, only $164b out of the 2010 federal budget goes to pay interest on the national debt compared to $2.381 trillion in receipts so yes, our tax money does go to pay the $64.6b for the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan (see http://www.gpoaccess.gov/usbudget/fy10/pdf/fy10-newera.pdf).
I have to admit that the old Federal Reserve runs the federal government is sort of a conversation stopper for me. If you prefer that sort of thinking to the real world, we really don’t have enough common ground to converse.

Sam, if HRW were terminating lives, I would agree with you wholeheartedly, even if it were but a single life – but they aren’t. They publish reports and express opinions, probably 90% of which are in defense of human rights and human dignity and are quite laudable. Publishing factual reports that correctly identify what countries restrict abortions is not sinful. The only morally objectionable thing I have seen that they occasionally express disagreement with laws restricting abortion.

Had Charles Manson written a report expressing antipathy toward the Tates and 100 others on virtuous topics, I would look askew at the Tate screed and praise the other writings. He did not limit himself to issuing reports and writing commentaries, so your hyperbolic commentary doesn’t really hold water.

I think the whole point here was that it was moral relativism that excuses or contributes to the good while excusing the bad. you are waffling. Your definition of relativist appears relative. To what it is relative is up for grabs too.

As for the Fed the the banker cabal: Here it is from one of the big wigs himself.
Amsel (Amschel) Bauer Mayer Rothschild, 1838:
 
“Let me issue and control a Nation’s money and I care not who makes its laws”.

He doesn’t care who makes the laws because he owns the law makers. The Fed has the government over a barrel. If you read Edward’s comment earlier he pointed out that “the Federal reserve refused to be audited.” And you say the Fed isn’t in control here? Again, your “real world” appears to be relative. and again, to what no one can be sure.

Michael, I’ve been trying to be charitable and I appreciate teh opportunity for the practice, but aren’t you missing the Glenn Beck Show?

lol. That was funny. :) and no, I am not a Glenn fan. Fox news is owned by Murdok, murdok is a globalist, and that whole news organization is the right hand which is attached to the body which also has a left hand. (aren’t you missing something on NPR right now?) In other words, those two “hands” work together for the end that the head on that body is working towards.

Chesire eleven my dear,
your logic is twisted and queer.
i read with morose,
your support for soros,
but rejoice ‘cuse the others see clear.

Thanks for your charity, but please, feel free to extend it to the children that soros has aborted with your blessings. I can handle verbal jabs without much to do about it.

Well at least I can be reassured that you are no fan of Fox or Glen Beck, and no, I prefer the BBC to NPR, and Chesterton and Sheen to the both of them, but thanks for the concern.

Good night.

Michael, Your original point, “(Soros’) agenda is to disorder and reorder society to their liking” hits the nail on the head. It is too bad that you obscured it with your financial concerns.  Soros, and all of the progressives, hold that the human intellect is their god and that man has the ability to create heaven on earth (“to their liking”) so there is no need for an afterlife.

Chesire, I do have a problem with you and the other Catholics who support HRW and the other organizations that advocate the taking of human life because “(m)ost of their work is directed at opposing political, ethnic and religious persecution and defending human rights”. While these are laudable activities, you are engaging in moral equivalence that is contrary to the teaching of the Church. Whether that makes you a “good” or “bad” Catholic, I’ll leave to God, but your position is still contrary to the teaching of the Church.

Chesire,
Sadly, Chesire, you do twist in the wind of intellectual pride.

Actually if a baptised Catholic does NOT want to ADHERE to the teachings of the Catholic Church’s Faith and Morals as defined in the “CATECHISM of the CATHOLIC CHURCH, Second Edition”, they can officially leave the Church.
People do not have to be “eternally” Catholic.
Go to the Vatican web site and type in: “ACTUS FORMALIS DEFECTIONIS” which means Act of Formal Defection for the process. This is more formal than abandonment.
When approved the person’s baptismal certificate is stamped.  (Baptism and Confirmation don’t go away.)

When any Society does not respect life from conception to natural death, it has problems that will eventually destroy it.
All Catholics MUST adhere to the following or you are a HERETIC:
CCC - “2271 Since the first century the Church has affirmed the moral evil of every procured abortion. This teaching has not changed and remains unchangeable. Direct abortion, that is to say, abortion willed either as an end or a means, is gravely contrary to the moral law:
You shall not kill the embryo by abortion and shall not cause the newborn to perish.”
God, the Lord of life, has entrusted to men the noble mission of safeguarding life, and men must carry it out in a manner worthy of themselves. Life must be protected with the utmost care from the moment of conception: abortion and infanticide are abominable crimes.
CCC “2272 Formal cooperation in an abortion constitutes a grave offense. The Church attaches the canonical penalty of excommunication to this crime against human life. “A person who procures a completed abortion incurs excommunication latae sententiae,” “by the very commission of the offense,” and subject to the conditions provided by Canon Law. The Church does not thereby intend to restrict the scope of mercy. Rather, she makes clear the gravity of the crime committed, the irreparable harm done to the innocent who is put to death, as well as to the parents and the whole of society.”
Either you are a Catholic, or in the State of MORTAL SIN if you support, approve of, or participate directly or indirectly in ABORTION.
George Soros is a MURDERER - along with Obama, J. Biden, H. Clinton, N. Polosi, J. Kerry, etc., etc.  Catholics can not support Murderers.  They take away the basic right to life of human beings using tax dollars.

Catholics may not support or be a member of ANY organization that supports or encourages human ABORTION, Euthanasia or embroyonic stem cell research.
Nor can we support any Politican who supports Murdering these defenseless segments of our Society.
“Thou Shall NOT Kill”. - God.

“Sorry, but John is correct. Although the work done by Human Rights Watch to legalize, promote access to and “normalize” abortion is morally reprehensible, this is only a small part of the work they do.”

Chesire,
PLEASE substitute the word “slavery” for the word “abortion” in your statement above. Does the sentence then make any sense?? Of course not! But at least slaves were allowed to live…babies are not. They’re killed.

The kind of reasoning that you & John et al have persuaded yourselves makes sense is exactly the reason that this country is in the shape is it in today.
That is:
1. We would not have a pro-abortion president who voted 4 times to kill kids after they’re born.
2. We would have had enough children, if not for the Pill/abortion, so we wouldn’t have to be up to our necks in debt for Social Security/Medicare.
3. We wouldn’t be worried, as they are in Europe, about this becoming an Islamic country bc they’re the only ones who are having babies…

The list goes on & on. Wake up & smell the coffee.

Danielle, I didn’t have to wait long after I read your article to put your last suggestion into practice…now I’m going to work on the first two for C & J!

My aunt doth protest!

“Have you heard of “Cutting off one’s nose to spite his face”? This practice came from Catholic nuns…look it up.
The Human Rights Watch works to benefit and assist in:
Children’s Rights
Counterterrorism
Disability Rights
ESC Rights
Health
International Justice
LGBT Rights
Migrants
Press Freedom
Refugees
Terrorism
Torture
United Nations
Women’s Rights
and where Danielle Bean gets upset is that last one; womens rights (& LGBT rights).
Many of these women were raped, tortured and disfigured. They were cut so that their bladder did not function & many commit suicide. The God of the Old Testament was a vengeful God but the God of the New Testament said we should love one another. Even Saint Augustine said “one should not deviate from the authority of God’s law by taking unlawful steps to avoid the suspicions of men.” By that very assumption you would much sooner allow thousands, tens of thousands or even more to suffer and die because you are suspicious of George Soros donation? This is either ignorance or political malfeasance to question a generous donation to one of the best charitable organizations.”

I disagree, but I’m rather inarticulate today.  Something about rotten apples not falling far from poisonous trees, I think.

DTM,
you guys are like broken records with this constant nonsense. You keep chanting the same broken arguements. Logic and reasoning on the toddlers level. It is most lucky for you that you haven’t ventured into arguing against the laws of physics. To everyone else out there, George soros and his cronies are monsters. Look up the agenda they have that hides behind these “charities”. Do your good as a Catholic by a Catholic venue. and make sure that THAT Catholic venue has not been corrupted! it happens! Dont give your money to anything because it makes you feel good. make sure it is actually doing good and by a just means. if i visit a church and the priest has an abortion promoting congressman acting as a eucaristic minister i don’t put money in the basket even if the church has a really good soup kitchen or does such wonderful things x, y, and z.

DTM, If you don’t have a problem with supporting to an organization that is willing to support killing children while advocating for their rights, then I think you belong in another church. 

Can you spell m-o-r-a-l e-q-u-i-v-a-l-e-n-c-y?

See?  That’s my thing, there are plenty of ways to help the needy without…collateral damage.

Say!  What if, what if…What if it’s really some diabolical ploy?  That seems like something the enemy would do, doesn’t it?  A tiny lie amidst a lot of truth, a poison apple hiding in the bushel?

(Sorry for the DP)

It’s as though to say, “You wouldn’t REALLY give up ALL this GOOD for the sake of that..little..tiny evil over there, would you?”

Turnabout!  They’re the ones killing children, but they make it seem like I’m the monster!

DTMc, you’re the one making excuses for them! You just made a huge list of all the “goodies” they bribed you with while killing children in the back room. You’re not the monster, just playing the part of what stalin and lenin and the rest of the killers would call a useful idiot. They will be just as happy to kill you to and still you pander and excuse what they are doing. You might even plea, while they level the barrel to your temple, “but i supported you?” And if you are lucky they will laugh and say thank you for your support just before they pull the trigger. I have to wonder just how many of the German jews voted for hitler. and then i have to wonder if they ever realized the error as they marched into a gas chamber. It is mind boggling that we have catholics, or people with any sense at all, who can support these politicians and policies so blindly. I really can’t believe we have jewish friends and neighbors who can vote for people like Chuck Schumer. These people pass all the same laws as Nazi Germany did. Word for word in some cases!!!

*Gasp!*  You misunderstand me, sir!  T’was my aunt who made the list and the excuses!  I simply brought them here for a refutation of them!

DTMc
you have my appologies. it is a little difficult to see where the two break. and the st. augustine quote doesn’t seem to be appropriate to the point that you are trying to make. or is that your aunt?

Why do Liberal/Progressives keep bringing up Glen Beck?  It seems they afraid of his popularity.  Why don’t they knock all the Socialist Media outlets - there are many more of them.
Beck has nothing to do with Federal Government funding and laws.
I think the article requires us to STATE the MURDERERS - Obama, and his appointee H. Clinton, J. Biden, J. Kerry, O. Snow, B. Boxer, N. Polosi, etc., who support this killing of human life.
Look on the internet for “Endowment for Human Development”.  It is not a relgious site, but a teaching site using the latest technology.  By 6 1/2 weeks hand movement can be seen.
George Soros helps to fund Killing of humans.
Bringing up other topics will not change the MURDERING facts.

You can control your own donations. Give directly.  No excuses.  You don’t need to depend on anyone to tell you what to do.
“Priests for Life”; 
“St. Vincent De Paul” for the homeless and needy;
Your own Parish if it teaches in accord with the CCC;
EWTN (Eternal Word Television Network) for evangelizing - getting the “WORD” out;
Auto License Plates = “Choose Life” which gives money for adoptions;
Catholic high schools and Catholic Universities only if they use the CCC as a student TEXT.
This should get you started.
If you have questions always stick to finding out if they adhere 100% to the CCC. (Which means you have to read the CCC from cover to cover to insure you personally know what it says.
Beware since Soros funds may so-called Catholic organizations, that are no more “Catholic” than my dog.  But at least my dog does not sin.

Sandy,
Exactly! no reason at all to support any other charity that doesn’t also adhear to the faith. For evangelization I would ad the national catholic register and Catholic answers at www.catholic.com

1. Pray.

God doesn’t need a cash infusion to reach deep into the hearts of men. He can change people’s hearts and minds, one unborn baby at a time. Make pro-life intentions a daily part of your prayer life.

LMAO!

RE: George Soros

No matter what “good” you may think George and his ilk are doing through HRW, I can assure you that there is far more evil being done than good. HRW does not have to directly supply abortions. It can, and does, donate the funds you donate to them to planned parenthood and other pro-abortion, anti-catholic organizations. Do your homework. Go visit Wikipedia and look him up. It won’t take you long to find out that everywhere his money goes, death follows behind it.

Brandy Miller brings up a great point.  Use Wikipedia for your facts.  Who cares that anyone can edit any information true or false.  You guys are all wacky!

did you know jesus was a mid-easterner, like arabs, not white like the catholic church(the devil’s church) proclaims. I mean sure they say he’s from bethlehem, but in all the pics he is white. the catholic church is the devil’s church full of lies and followed by poor souls who will forever burn in hell. The church and it’s followers used to also say that the universe revolves around earth, that is BLASPHEMY. there are so many other examples, please turn away from the devil’s church if you care about your immortal soul.