Colo. Bishops: Court Ruling Misinterprets Marriage

On Thursday, Adams County district court Judge C. Scott Crabtree ruled that Colorado’s marriage amendment was unconstitutional.

DENVER — A court decision advancing “gay marriage” in Colorado undercuts truth and helps erode the family in society, the state’s bishops have said.

On Thursday, Adams County district court Judge C. Scott Crabtree ruled that Colorado’s marriage amendment was unconstitutional, claiming it “bears no rational relationship to any conceivable government interest.”

The bishops said the July 10 ruling “advances a misinterpretation of the institution of marriage in modern society, reducing marriage to a sheer emotional arrangement that can simply be redefined to accommodate the impulses of culture.”

“Upholding the truth about marriage advances the dignity of all people, and it promotes a culture that acknowledges, values and respects the unique and complementary gifts of both a mother and a father in the lives of children,” they said July 10 through the Colorado Catholic Conference.

Though Crabtree immediately stayed his own ruling, it has already affected the issuing of marriage licenses in the state.

On Friday, Boulder County district court Judge Andrew Hartman rejected Colorado Attorney General John Suthers’ request to halt the Boulder County Clerk and Recorder Office from distributing marriage licenses to same-sex couples.

Suthers has said the licenses are invalid under state law.

The Denver Clerk and Recorder Office has also begun to distribute same-sex “marriage” licenses. Pueblo Clerk and Recorder Gilbert “Bo” Ortiz said that his office would begin issuing marriage licenses to same-sex couples on Friday, The Denver Post reported.

The bishops voiced support for the marriage amendment, saying that, “as Catholics, we have a duty to protect and preserve marriage as the union of one man and one woman in our laws and policies. We are called to make this stand because redefining marriage will only further erode the family structure of our society.”

They stressed their sensitivity to the pastoral care of homosexual persons “in our communities, families and churches.”

“At the same time, our role as Catholic bishops requires that we speak the truth with charity. We affirm what our Church teaches — namelL that we must treat our homosexual sisters and brothers with dignity and love, as we would all God’s children.”

The Colorado marriage amendment passed in 2006 with 56% of the vote.

While media depicted the amendment as a “ban” on same-sex unions, the amendment simply defines marriage as a union of a man and a woman for the purpose of state law. It does not ban private ceremonies.

The Colorado Legislature passed a civil unions law in 2013 that gave unmarried heterosexual couples and same-sex couples in registered civil unions the same rights and duties as married couples. The bill drew additional concern because it dropped religious-freedom protections for adoption agencies.

Even before the latest controversy, significant legal pressure has targeted those who do not support same-sex “marriage” in the state.

Jack Phillips, a Colorado baker, was recently the subject of legal action because he declined to bake a same-sex “wedding” cake, citing his Christian beliefs. He was ordered by the state’s Civil Rights Commission to train himself and his employees to conform to state anti-discrimination law.

The baker decided to stop baking wedding cakes altogether rather than risk further legal action.

Read more

Eucharistic Pilgrimage Marks ‘New Dawn’ In Minnesota Diocese Once Bruised By Scandal

Only a few years after being rocked by a clergy sex abuse coverup, the Diocese of Crookston is embracing its outsize role in the...

Synodal Way Isn’t Answer to Germany’s ‘Mission Country’ Status, Evangelization Leaders Say

Catholic leaders of evangelization efforts in Germany agree with Bishop Bätzing’s recent diagnosis of the country’s spiritual quandary,...

Kicking Butker: KC Chiefs’ Star Torched on Social Media for His Graduation Speech

Mainstream media critics of Butker’s Benedictine College address went after him for what he said — and what he didn’t say.