At Georgetown, Most Professors Critical of Ryan Fail to Sign Letter Protesting Sebelius Visit

Patrick Deneen gets signature of one colleague, but no response from nearly 90 others.

(photo: Patrick Neil/Wikipedia)

Patrick Deneen, the founding director of the Tocqueville Forum on the Roots of American Democracy at Georgetown University, and several other faculty members drafted a letter to Georgetown's president, John DeGioia, asking him to rescind the Georgetown Public Policy Institute’s invitation to Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius. Deneen supplied a copy of the letter to the Register and said that his group invited a “large number of faculty to join, including all faculty in Catholic studies and all signers of the letter to Congressman [Paul] Ryan, along with faculty whom we believed might be inclined to sign. A total of nine faculty elected to sign this letter.”

Ryan, the Republican chairman of the House of Representatives Budget Committee, spoke at Georgetown April 26. Nearly 90 Georgetown faculty members signed an open letter to the Wisconsin congressman, highly critical of his budget.

Deneen, in a letter inviting these signers to also sign his letter about Sebelius, told his colleagues that they “publicly stated your support for the tradition of Catholic social teaching and in that letter affirmed the public witness and wisdom of the Church’s bishops.”

Only one of Ryan letter signatories agreed to sign the letter to DeGioia, he told the Register.


The letter to DeGioia follows:


May 10, 2012

Dear President DeGioia:

The invitation to serve as a speaker during commencement exercises is one of the greatest honors that a University community can bestow upon an individual. Such invitations do much more than recognize the accomplishments of honorees; they constitute a statement by our community of the esteem in which we hold their words and actions. Our community presents such speakers as models to our graduates at the culmination of their years of study at Georgetown. As you put it so well: “Our commencement speakers are exceptional individuals ... who will provide inspiration for our students as they envision more clearly the impact they can make in the world.”
For this reason, we, the undersigned members of the Georgetown University academic community, wish to state our belief that it was a grave and serious mistake — indeed, a scandalous one — for Georgetown to invite Health and Human Services Department Secretary Kathleen Sebelius to serve as speaker before the 2012 graduating class of the Georgetown Public
Policy Institute. Secretary Sebelius’s role in crafting and advancing the HHS mandate that requires religious institutions to offer insurance coverage that would provide abortion-inducing drugs, sterilization and contraceptives, makes her a profoundly objectionable choice. To afford
Secretary Sebelius the singular honor that is accorded in this invitation, especially in the context of the ongoing efforts of the Catholic bishops and many Catholic faithful, joined by eminent leaders of the Protestant, Jewish, and Muslim communities — effectively implies endorsement by
Georgetown of the grave and dangerous assault upon religious liberty that the mandate constitutes. In truth, it is difficult to believe that the according of this honor to Secretary
Sebelius was motivated by anything other than a desire to send a message of endorsement.
The Ad Hoc Committee on Religious Liberty of the United States Conference of Catholic
Bishops has issued a powerful statement defending the primacy of religious freedom as “the first liberty,” that liberty that makes possible all others. It notes with special attention the threat that is posed to this “first liberty” by the HHS mandate as proposed, and even as amended, by Secretary
Sebelius. As the Bishops write in their report entitled “Our First, Most Cherished Liberty”
(http://www.usccb.org/issues-and-action/religious-liberty/our-first-most-cherished-liberty.cfm) —indeed, invoking the example of Georgetown’s founder, Bishop John Carroll, S.J. — the robust protection of religious liberty “is our American heritage, our most cherished freedom. If we are not free in our conscience and our practice of religion, all other freedoms are fragile. If our obligations and duties to God are impeded, or even worse, contradicted by the government, then we can no longer claim to be a land of the free.” The USCCB states that “the mandate of the
Department of Health and Human Services has been met with our vigorous and united opposition.” Georgetown, the nation’s oldest Catholic university, should be joining the Church’s leaders in this opposition; its administration and faculty should certainly not be honoring the mandate’s leading architect.
Further, we note that the Catholic bishops of the United States addressed precisely the issue before us in their 2004 document, Catholics in Political Life. What they had to say could not be clearer:


The Catholic community and Catholic institutions should not honor those who act in defiance of our fundamental moral principles. They should not be given awards, honors or platforms which would suggest support for their actions.


We prayerfully implore you to revisit the invitation to Secretary Sebelius. It would be a mistake to confuse the honorific and hortatory role of a commencement event speaker with the legitimate exchange of ideas in the daily life and activities of the university. We respectfully request that you withdraw this invitation to Secretary Sebelius.


Cc: Provost James O’Donnell
Cc: Dean Edward B. Montgomery, GPPI
Cc: Cardinal Donald Wuerl, Archdiocese of Washington, DC
Cc: Cardinal Timothy M. Dolan, Archdiocese of New York
Cc: Cardinal Francis George, Archdiocese of Chicago
Cc: Archbishop William E. Lori, Diocese of Baltimore


Sincerely,


Patrick J. Deneen
Associate Professor
Tsakopoulos-Kounalakis Chair in Hellenic Studies
Founding Director, The Tocqueville Forum on the Roots of American Democracy
Department of Government

Kevin Doak
Professor and Nippon Foundation Endowed Chair
Department of East Asian Languages and Cultures

Stephen M. Fields, S.J.
Associate Professor, Historical/Philosophical Theology
Department of Theology

Edward J. Finn
Professor (Emeritus)
Department of Physics

Rev. Mark G. Henninger, S.J.
Professor
Martin Chair of Medieval Philosophy
Department of Philosophy

Mark C. Murphy
Professor
McDevitt Chair of Religious Philosophy
Department of Philosophy

John Pfordresher
Professor
Department of English

James V. Schall, S.J.
Professor
Department of Government

Wilfried Ver Eecke
Professor
Department of Philosophy


 

Cardinal Rainer Maria Woelki of Cologne attends a German Synodal Way assembly on March 9, 2023.

Four German Bishops Resist Push to Install Permanent ‘Synodal Council’

Given the Vatican’s repeated interventions against the German process, the bishops said they would instead look to the Synod of Bishops in Rome. Meanwhile, on Monday, German diocesan bishops approved the statutes for a synodal committee; and there are reports that the synodal committee will meet again in June.

Palestinian Christians celebrate Easter Sunday Mass at Holy Family Church in Gaza City on March 31, amid the ongoing battles Israel and the Hamas militant group.

People Explain ‘Why I Go to Mass’

‘Why go to Mass on Sundays? It is not enough to answer that it is a precept of the Church. … We Christians need to participate in Sunday Mass because only with the grace of Jesus, with his living presence in us and among us, can we put into practice his commandment, and thus be his credible witnesses.’ —Pope Francis