Where’s the “Silicon Valley” for Catholicism? Allow me to explain.
We Catholics give a ton of money to some really, really great charities who do amazing work. But most of it goes toward only one part of the “need chain” - the end product (or the bureaucracy to deliver it).
We buy a lot of food and clothes. We counsel a lot of people. Provide shelter and medical supplies. We provide for a lot of the temporal needs of the needy and the practical needs of being The Church.
But how much of that money is going toward doing all of that better? How much is not just going for more food, but to develop more efficient ways of growing and distributing food?
Lots goes toward medicine and bandaids (pun intended). How much goes toward innovative ways to provide those services in more efficient and effective ways?
We create a lot of spiritual material - books, magazines, websites and, now, apps and more. But who is investing in finding ways to market and distribute those in today’s culture in more effective ways?
The key word there is “investing.” It’s not a comfortable word for a lot of Catholics. Or, at least, it doesn’t seem like it. But perhaps it’s because they haven’t been given the opportunity to think of it that way.
Right now, many Catholics give out of obligation. They certainly rarely give because they are particularly impressed by the return on their investment. And that’s exactly what it is: an investment with a return.
Some people don’t like to think about charity as an investment. But that’s precisely why we’re not doing as well as we could be. It’s the same reason people don’t like the idea of running a ministry like a “business.” Well what’s wrong with that? Running something like a business doesn’t necessarily mean it’s a greedy, for-profit organization that exploits people as just another commodity. It just means it’s a sustainable operation. Isn’t that what we should want?
And let’s be clear, charity can’t be based on what you get in return, either. But it is based on what others get in return. And that’s the “return on investment” we’re talking about here. If you can maximize that return (charity), then we will maximize the investment (charitable giving).
If we focused more on developing more such sustainable models for charitable operations, we’d be able to provide a lot more charity and do a lot more good in the world (as opposed to just plain annoying people with endless, dramatic appeals). And if we’d stop running our parishes like 2nd grade fundraisers, and instead inspired people to invest in something amazing and exciting and Holy, we could really do some big things.
All of that said, the point of the Church is not only to feed more mouths. It’s to feed more souls. And that’s where this gets really exciting.
Who’s investing in innovative ways to do that? Who wants to invest their money in new ways to evangelize? To find out what works right now in this climate and this culture? In new ways to re-energize the faithful? In new ways to bring back fallen away Catholics? In new ways to communicate as a Church? In new ways to “market” the Church. In new businesses that can help sustain all of that? In “startups” that pull all of the right people together and put the best and the brightest in the Church on solving the challenges of today?
I think there are lots and lots of Catholics (and many who have a lot of money) who would love to invest in things like that. The problem is that there’s no easy way to do that right now.
Yes, there are individuals who have done this successfully on their own. And there are increasingly more individual organizations doing great, innovative things in this regard. But we can do much, much better. We need to help them. We have the resources to do it. We just aren’t organized enough and aren’t thinking big enough - yet.
The most brilliant ideas occur when the right people come together to share and collaborate. And those brilliant ideas become reality when they meet the people with the resources to execute them. We don’t have a good mechanism for making any of that happen right now in the Church. We should. We need a Silicon Valley for Catholicism.



Comments
Post a Comment
some great thoughts here… i work for a struggling (from a financial point of view, not a spiritual one) nonprofit, ChristLife, that is focused on helping Catholics encounter Jesus personally and evangelize… we are def in need of innovation, in terms of reaching people for Christ! The Holy Spirit is the original creative innovator. Let’s ask Him to help us out!
Amen. I am among many professionals who would love to spend every day working full-time innovating for the Church. There are so many people of my generation who are graduation from college and even high school now, or have some years of experience under their belts, and who are fully equipped to serve the New Evangelization. How much of our talent, skill, and experience will be wasted?
We need more Lydias, Mary Magdalenes…even Medicis…who are willing to invest in apostolic work. Whatever happened to them?
Great…those with creative and mgmt talent but zero patience with low standards of productivity quality and organization tolerated in many church run offices and groups would have more incentive to share their gifts. The Protetants are way ahead of us in this area. Thaks for this article. Sent from my Kindle…
Matt, I like the way you think.
Matt,
Can I ask, first, that these faithful Catholics support their own parish?
I work in Communications for a parish of over 1500 families, and my entire job is internal and external communications. Many priests, when they hear all that I do (marketing for the school, website, bulletin, newsletters, social media, etc.) say that they’d love to have a person in that position, but can’t afford to pay them. While I don’t make much, I’m very blessed to at least able to pay the bills doing what I love.
Since I’m only one of three or four in our entire diocese that has a somewhat similar “full-time” position, it’s hard to get a think-tank together on a local level.
Please support your parishes as well!
Jane - absolutely. Parishes are included and implied in this post. The same concepts apply and I speak more directly about parishes in some of the other posts I link to. If parishes would demonstrate and communicate more effectively WHAT exactly parishioners are giving (investing in) to and that they are good, effective stewards of parishioner money, then more people would better support their parish.
Strong parishes are essential to any of these other things working.
I recently read “Do Hard Things” by Alex and Brett Harris encouraging teens to rebel against low expectations. One point they make is that young people often have the energy while older people often have the wisdom to know where the energy should be channeled . What if youth groups were more than just social clubs? What if teens were given real responsibilities within the parish?
Matt—Thanks so much. I’d like to take what you say a step further. To demonstrate effectiveness, you have to take the time and spend the money to develop an “infrastructure” and actually count (quantify) the things you do. How many of our parishes/ministries are running on donated computers, have little to none IT expertise on staff, are just one computer crash or virus away from “real bad things.” I am constantly amazed at the number of parishes that still don’t have web sites. Whenever a decision to hire a new person is made within a ministry, WAY too much emphasis is placed on what the person will cost vs. what resources the person brings to the table. How much staff time is spent working around cheap equipment, donated junk and ineffective volunteers who just aren’t able to do the job. You are spot on—you can’t run a ministry like a business, but you sure can use business principles to make a ministry more effective.
Post a Comment
By submitting this form, you give The National Catholic Register permission to publish this comment. Comments will be published at our discretion, and may be edited for clarity and length. For best formatting, please limit your response to one paragraph and don't hit "enter" to force line breaks.