Print Article | Email Article | Write To Us

Daily News

Bishops Speak Out Against Rhode Island Civil-Unions Bill (1436)

Bishop Thomas Tobin asks Catholics to pray for 'God's patience, mercy and forgiveness in these distressing times.'

07/05/2011 Comments (4)
Wikipedia

– Wikipedia

Providence, R.I. (EWTN News) — The U.S. Catholic bishops have expressed their disapproval with a civil-unions bill likely to be signed into law after passing Rhode Island’s state Senate on June 29.

“In no way can civil-union measures be considered a permissible compromise or a step in advancing the common good, said Bishop Salvatore Cordileone, chairman of the U.S. bishops’ Subcommittee for the Promotion and Defense of Marriage, in a July 1 statment. “Instead, they directly violate principles of justice and accelerate the push to redefine marriage itself.”

The bill, likely to be signed by Gov. Lincoln Chafee, would allow same-sex couples to enter into a “legal union” with “all the rights, benefits, protections and responsibilities as those of people who are married,” according to a statement released by the Senate. The bill passed with a vote of 21-16.

Speaking on behalf of the U.S. bishops, Bishop Cordileone said that marriage, “the communion of husband and wife,” is a unique reality that has no equivalent. He also noted that the legalization of civil unions in Rhode Island would harm the unique status and meaning of marriage and promote the “crossing of moral boundaries.”

“The exclusive and permanent bond of a man and woman joined in marriage offers to the couple, and to society, a pre-eminent value that should not be eclipsed by governmental attempts to redesign fundamental realities by legal dictate,” the bishop stated.

Allowing civil unions for homosexual couples, he continued, is unjust “because now the government is treating as similar two different realities that cannot be considered as analogous or equivalent in any way.”

Bishop Thomas Tobin, head of the Diocese of Providence, also denounced the bill and said that he was “deeply disappointed” by the establishment of civil unions in the state. He encouraged Catholics to pray for “God’s patience, mercy and forgiveness in these distressing times.”

“The concept of civil unions is a social experiment that promotes an immoral lifestyle, is a mockery of the institution of marriage as designed by God, undermines the well-being of our families, and poses a threat to religious liberty,” Bishop Tobin said June 30.

He emphasized the Church’s “respect and love” for those who experience same-sex attraction. But he explained that homosexual activity was “contrary to the natural law and the will of God.”

Chafee has said he supports the bill because it is an “incremental step” toward allowing homosexual “marriage.” House Speaker Gordon Fox also supports same-sex “marriage,” but indicated that civil unions were introduced as a compromise because of insufficient support for a redefinition of marriage.

 

Filed under bishops, catholic marriage, catholic morality, church teaching, civil-unions bill, rhode island, traditional marriage

Comments

Post a Comment

It is much more how we treat a thing than the name we give it that says what we really consider it to be.  Same-sex civil unions = same-sex “marriage”

“He emphasized the Church’s “respect and love” for those who experience same-sex attraction. But he explained that homosexual activity was “contrary to the natural law and the will of God.”

Can someone tell me how this is put into action?
Lobbying to limit my rights and impose your standard on me does not do this.

Why are these bishops so uptight? It’s not like civil unions or same sex marriage puts anybody’s soul in danger. If that were the case, surely the bishops would say very publicly that such acts are mortal sin, and those people who practiced such acts were in danger of going to hell. But the bishops do not say such acts are mortal sin, so there cannot be anything wrong with them. Why are they so uptight.

Joseph, the problem I believe is with your definition of love and respect.  It does not simply mean enabling you to do whatever you want.  Also please remember that while we may technically at times have a “right” to sin under civil law, there is no excuse for being determined to exercise it!

Post a Comment

By submitting this form, you give The National Catholic Register permission to publish this comment. Comments will be published at our discretion, and may be edited for clarity and length. For best formatting, please limit your response to one paragraph and don't hit "enter" to force line breaks.

Name:

Email:

Write your comment:

Please enter the word you see in the image below:

     

Notify me of follow-up comments.