Part 1 | Part 2
Although physical competence helps the family men in all three films provide and protect their families, each of the films recognizes that more is required. Good fathers must be available for their children, must enter into their children’s worlds. This can be as simple as a silly but familiar word game between Sam Childers and his daughter, or Brendan allowing his daughters to put a bonnet on his head and paint his cheeks like Raggedy Ann.
This scene in Warrior—significantly, Brendan’s first appearance in the film—illustrates a tendency in Hollywood films generally to depict family men as less emphatically masculine than their single peers. (Stella Bruzzi documents this in Bringing Up Daddy: Fatherhood and Masculinity in Postwar Hollywood.) Note Brendan’s comment on his daughters’ game: “I think Daddy’s become a princess.”
Although the film emphasizes the attractiveness of Brendan’s wife (repeatedly showing her in varying states of dishabille), Brendan’s struggles to provide for his family leave him unable to protect her dignity as he would like, and he watches in chagrin as she departs for a waitressing job wearing a revealing outfit that may occasion harassment from male patrons.
Compared to his bad-boy younger brother Tommy—a fierce, glowering alpha male, taking down opponent after opponent within seconds and unceremoniously quitting the cage without even waiting to be declared the winner—Brendan is less dominant and more sensitive. (In my review I called Brendan Faramir to Tommy’s Boromir.) In the cage Brendan is tentative and cautious, relying less on power than on endurance, patience and strategy, winning bouts with submission holds rather than knockouts. Warrior may ultimately affirm Brendan’s mode of manhood over Tommy’s, but Brendan’s the underdog all the way.
Even in Courageous, for all its celebration of square-jawed fatherhood, there are indications that a man may have to risk adopting a somewhat less masculine image in order to enter his children’s world. Director and cowriter Alex Kendrick plays a competent but emotionally semi-unavailable father named Adam who watches fondly while his daughter dances on the grass but self-consciously declines to dance with her, offering the excuse that he will dance in his heart. This paternal reticence, which will later haunt Adam, reflects a false or exaggerated masculine self-regard that fathers must dispense with. (On the other hand, being there for his teenaged son ultimately requires Adam to display greater masculine energy by sharing the boy’s passion for running and even competing with him.)
A subtle tension between masculinity and domesticity affects Machine Gun Preacher as well. For Sam Childers, religion is initially something that his wife imposes on him, and at first he looks scruffily out of place at a white-bread Assemblies of God praise service. Later, though, stopping by a bar in a striped collar shirt to talk to an old biker buddy, he looks almost as out of place. Respectability has taken a certain toll on his rugged image, at least for the moment.
Eventually Sam seems to figure out how to reconcile his customary Harley-Davidson mojo with his new-found faith—but as time goes on, Sam’s increasing militantcy about his African work and opposition to the Sudanese rebels undermines both his religious feeling and his commitment to his family. Thus, the tension between Sam’s masculinity and his domestic entanglements, including his faith, remains unresolved.
In Warrior, religion matters only for the father Paddy, whose Catholic faith informs his 12-step recovery from alcoholism. Even responsible family man Brendan shows no sign of religiosity, and his protectiveness of his family leads him to be harshly unforgiving with his father—an estrangement that shows little if any sign of healing.
For Courageous, of course, faith in Jesus is nothing less than the foundation for authentic manhood. The gang leaders offer an intimidating counterpoint, and an orphaned young man lacking male role models falls in with them rather than with, say, one of the heroic cops with whom he has a brief exchange.
Overall, despite some issues, religion is handled respectfully and is depicted as a positive force in the lives of Warrior‘s Paddy (and his wife) and Machine Gun Preacher‘s Sam Childers (it goes without saying that the same is true of Courageous). Notwithstanding the flaws of individual characters, masculinity as such and the importance of fatherhood in particular are constructively engaged. While none of these are perfect films, I’m reasonably encouraged by these positive trends.
Incidentally, next month will offer a change of pace from all this testosterone: a Christian-themed sports film about women, The Mighty Macs.
Further reading: Fatherhood and Hollywood: Dads in the Movies (Decent Films)
Part 1 | Part 2



Comments
Post a Comment
Steven, I appreciate your analysis of this mini-trend. I noticed it myself, and was considering it when I saw the forthcoming Sheen-Estevez, father-son, film “The Way.” It’s yet another example of the trend, examining a man coming to terms with what is expected of him, and the ways he did, and didn’t measure up as a father.
Thanks, Tim. Yes, I thought of The Way too while I was writing this piece. I’ll probably be revisiting some of these themes in October when it opens.
“A subtle tension between masculinity and domesticity…” I do not buy into this premise. There is no inherent tension between the two—any tension is between one’s own beliefs and one’s actions and therefore self-imposed.
“Brendan’s struggles to provide for his family leave him unable to protect her dignity as he would like…” This statement is a croc, too. His being able to provide has nothing whatsoever to do with her dignity or how well it is protected. Her dignity is hers alone—she is responsible for it, just as you are yours. While Brendan may feel responsible, ultimately the skimpy-outfit waitress job was a choice. And while Brendan may have had input and family circumstances may been a factor, the choice was hers. Further, regardless of circumstances, the church teaches the inherent dignity of all persons.
@LG:
Regarding the “tension between masculinity and domesticity,” I’m describing a tendency in Hollywood films. Whatever validity or nonvalidity the correlation may have in the real world—I’m not saying anything about that one way or the other—it’s there in the reel world.
There are choices and choices. A choice between losing your house and taking a waitressing job where you have to wear skimpy outfits and may be harassed by male customers (if it’s the best or the only work you can find) can be called a choice, but it’s a choice no husband wants to see his wife have to make.
I don’t think there is any necessary slight to the equality of dignity and moral agency in women and men to posit that a) being ogled or harassed by men is demeaning to a woman’s dignity; b) there is tendency, rooted in both nature and culture, for a man to be or to aspire to be a protector as well as a provider; and c) it is not unreasonable for a husband to hope or wish to be a successful enough provider to spare his wife an unpleasant choice such as the one described above, or, if he is unable to do, to be bothered by this state of affairs.
... and feels it reflects poorly on him, right, Steven?
There is a movie, Steve, that I saw at Toronto—directed by a woman, got my highest first-view grade (9) and was loved by many of my secular critic buds—that I cannot WAIT for you to see on exactly the subject of this thread. I am convinced it is the most anti-feminist text on manliness ever made by a modern “liberated” woman.
I guess there’s no reason not to name the title—it’s THE LONELIEST PLANET by Julia Loktev, but the central event in the film is so stunning that you hardly imagine you’ve seen it.
I don’t want to describe the events, but it’s as if, during a normal liturgy, the priest blurted out during the homily “oh, I don’t believe this mystical voodoo.” And then caught himself, and said “I meant I *do* believe this. I really do. I love the Body and Blood of Christ and the Eternal Sacrifice of the Mass more than life itself. It’s all I live for, etc., ...” And then the Mass went on as normal.
THE LONELIEST PLANET is *like* (obviously there is nothing Mass-like in the subject matter) a movie of that Mass.
Post a Comment
By submitting this form, you give The National Catholic Register permission to publish this comment. Comments will be published at our discretion, and may be edited for clarity and length. For best formatting, please limit your response to one paragraph and don't hit "enter" to force line breaks.