US Bishops Vote to Keep Time Limits on Discussion of Eucharistic Document
Included in the meeting’s agenda for Thursday is a vote on whether to begin drafting a teaching document on the Eucharist.
While some U.S. bishops on Wednesday pushed for no time limits in debating a motion to draft a teaching document on the Eucharist during their meeting this week, a majority opposed that push, allowing for a vote to proceed under the normal limits of debate.
As the bishops began their annual spring meeting on Wednesday afternoon — held virtually this year due to the pandemic — they voted in a parliamentary move to approve their meeting agenda. Included in the meeting’s agenda for Thursday is a vote on whether to begin drafting a teaching document on the Eucharist.
Before the vote on the document on Thursday afternoon, there will be a period of debate governed by rules and time limits as part of the conference’s parliamentary procedures. Archbishop Mitchell Rozanski of St. Louis, however, moved to change the agenda to allow for unlimited debate.
At the end of the discussion, 59% of bishops voted against Archbishop Rozanski’s motion. The bishops then voted to approve the meeting agenda, which 86% of those present moved to do.
Archbishop Rozanski said that due to the virtual nature of the assembly, there should be no time limits on debate among the bishops. “We owe this to our people,” he said. Cardinal Joseph Tobin of Newark, New Jersey, seconded the motion.
The topic of Communion has been a topic of extensive discussion recently, with individual bishops speaking out on worthiness to receive Communion, especially with regard to Catholic politicians who support permissive legislation on grave evils such as abortion and euthanasia.
The prefect of the Vatican’s Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Cardinal Luis Ladaria, wrote to Archbishop José Gomez, the president of the U.S. bishops’ conference, on May 7, instructing that if the bishops were to issue any “national policy” on Communion, they would first need “extensive and serene” dialogue among themselves.
Some bishops, citing Cardinal Ladaria’s call, wrote to Archbishop Gomez in May, asking for a delay in consideration of the Eucharistic document until the bishops can again meet in person. Archbishop Gomez, in turn, responded in a May 22 memo to all bishops that the discussion would take place as planned.
Bishops on Wednesday cited Cardinal Ladaria’s words in calling for no time limits in the discussion on Eucharistic consistency.
Bishop John Stowe of Lexington, Kentucky, emphasized the need to “discuss and take our time” about such a document on the Eucharist. “It seems that some of the brother bishops want to rush this discussion,” he said, advocating the need to “take our time with something that is so important and so delicate.”
Bishop Shawn McKnight of Jefferson City, Missouri, expressed concern about the “yoking of too many important decisions” in one Eucharistic document without the discussion that needs to take place.
Every bishop who wants to speak should be given the opportunity, he said. “I do not think that [Cardinal] Ladaria’s letter” is about asking conference committees to talk to each other, he said, adding that individual bishops must be able to debate among themselves on the document.
Archbishop John Wester of Santa Fe said that the two issues of the “beauty” of the Eucharist and who may receive Communion should be discussed separately.
Cardinal Blase Cupich of Chicago expressed concern about a proposed outline of the document, saying that it is “very clear, however, that the language within the draft does cause concern.” He called for a “full discussion” without time limits.
Proper discussion among the bishops “has not taken place,” he said, and discussion with Catholic politicians who support policies contrary to Church teaching has not taken place either, he added.
“And we should also have a discussion with Catholic politicians who have positions that are in conflict with the teachings of the Church to find out why they have those positions. That, too, has not taken place,” he said, arguing for no time limits on the discussion of the proposed Eucharistic document.
In 2019, Cardinal Cupich told CNA he had ongoing “conversations” with Catholic leaders in the Illinois Legislature who championed an abortion-coverage mandate. He told CNA that he thought it would be “counterproductive” to deny Holy Communion in his archdiocese to the legislators who championed the law.
“I have conversations with them, and those continue to take place. They have to,” he said in an interview with CNA on Communion for pro-abortion Catholic politicians that took place on the side of the bishops’ June 2019 meeting.
Other bishops, however, said that Thursday’s planned vote is merely to begin drafting a document on the Eucharist, not approving any final text of such a document.
Archbishop Joseph Naumann of Kansas City, Kansas, said that a “full discussion” among the bishops “will really best be accomplished when we have a draft of the document,” which could be accomplished by the bishops’ fall meeting in November if they vote to move ahead with the drafting of it this week.
He called efforts to change debate rules a “delaying tactic” that could hinder the timely manner of approving the document.
Archbishop Alexander Sample of Portland, Oregon, agreed, saying that in his 15 years in the conference he knew that time limits are necessary for discussion of issues. The full discussion among bishops, “which is certain to be very lively, I’m sure,” can happen when the text of the document is ready, he said.
Bishop Kevin Rhoades of Fort Wayne-South Bend, Indiana, chair of the doctrine committee that proposed the document, explained that the document “is broader” than just discussing admission to Communion.
“I think what we plan to do is completely in accord with what Cardinal Ladaria communicated in his letter,” he said. “We are no longer proposing a national policy” on Communion, he said, an idea that “was in the original proposal to the administrative committee, but we never meant it as it has been interpreted in many media sources.”
The proposed outline of a document on the Eucharist does include a section on “Eucharistic consistency,” or general worthiness to receive Communion. The doctrine committee also noted the particular responsibility of Catholic public officials to uphold Church teaching. However, the entire proposed outline includes many other aspects of the Church’s teaching on the Eucharist, including the Real Presence of Jesus, the importance of Sunday, and recovering a sense of the Eucharist as a sacrifice.