Arts & Entertainment
At Last, a ‘Shepherds and Wise Men’ Feature
The Nativity Story is a welcome addition to the family Christmas-film collection
BY STEVEN D. GREYDANUS
November 26-December 2, 2006 Issue | Posted 11/22/06 at 11:00 AM
Bible scholars tell us that the passion narratives in the Gospels represent the earliest stage in the development of New Testament tradition regarding the life of Christ.
How Jesus suffered, died and was raised was of paramount importance in the earliest days of the Church; interest in his birth and infancy came later, leading to the infancy narratives of Sts. Matthew and Luke.
It is fitting, then, that the success of The Passion of the Christ paved the way for The Nativity Story.
Previous Jesus films have generally sought to cover the whole story, whether according to one particular Gospel (Pasolini’s The Gospel According to St. Matthew) or synoptically (the 1977 miniseries Jesus of Nazareth). By contrast, The Passion and The Nativity Story, like earlier forms of Christian drama, are narrower in scope — modern equivalents of the medieval passion play and Christmas/Epiphany pageant.
Astonishingly, The Nativity Story is essentially the
first major “shepherds and wise men” feature film in
The Nativity Story goes a long way toward redressing this historic omission. Written by Mike Rich (The Rookie) and directed by Catherine Hardwicke (Thirteen), the film weaves and elaborates the infancy narratives of Matthew and Luke into a character-centered tale of faith, calling and sacrifice.
In a sense, most retellings of the
Nativity story tend to be “Lucan” in that, like
Luke’s infancy narrative, they focus more on Mary than Joseph. The Nativity Story is more “Matthean,” emphasizing Joseph’s character-arc. The film
includes the Lucan incidents of the Annunciation and
It’s in these scenes, fleshing out
the human dimension of what the terse biblical narratives merely imply, that The
Nativity Story is at its best. The tender relationship between young Mary (Keisha Castle-Hughes) and the older Elizabeth (Shohreh Aghdashloo) is touchingly
drawn. And the public shame and scandal faced by Mary returning to
Even after the angelic appearance
in his dream, Joseph continues to wrestle with uncertainty and doubt, notably
in an affecting moment on the journey to
What is not in keeping with Orthodox iconography, or with the oldest Catholic tradition, is the depiction of Joseph as a younger man. He’s often seen as a older widower with children by an earlier marriage.
What matters more is the film’s avoidance of the kind of love-story approach to Joseph and Mary’s relationship seen in some earlier treatments. Here, on the contrary, Mary is at first averse to the arranged betrothal, only gradually coming to respect and be grateful for the man the Lord has chosen to be father to her son. While necessarily speculative, this seems a plausible approach both psychologically and theologically.
While Mary’s perpetual virginity and Immaculate Conception aren’t affirmed, they aren’t contradicted either. It’s fair to say that the movie’s driving religious sensibility is more Protestant than Catholic, but nothing here need be a serious obstacle for Catholic viewers.
There are a few unfortunate flourishes, such as “Favored one” rather than “Full of grace” in the greeting of Gabriel (Alexander Siddig) to Mary, a rather limp translation. But there is much to praise about The Nativity Story.
The film is anchored by an earthy authenticity in production design and a solid cast led by Isaac’s sensitive, compelling Joseph and Aghdashloo’s warmly maternal Elizabeth. Castle-Hughes’ Mary has some strong moments, but doesn’t emerge as vividly as Joseph or Elizabeth. The score, by composer Mychael Danna, eschews the standard Middle-Eastern musical texture used in recent Bible films. It relies instead on traditional Christian music, including chant and early Christmas melodies, such as “O Come, O Come, Emmanuel.”
The film’s faults, such as they are, tend to be of omission rather than commission. At the Annunciation, we have Mary’s words “Let it be done to me according to your word” — but not “I am the Lord’s handmaid.” Such omissions are all the odder precisely because the whole challenge with these scenes is the paucity of source material.
Alas, Mary’s Magnificat, originally omitted altogether, is treated only briefly and in part, in a voiceover at the end of the film. The move itself actually makes sense — yet why omit the magnificent opening line from which the prayer takes its name (“My soul magnifies the Lord…”)? Why include “The Lord has done great things” and omit “for me”?
Perhaps most glaringly, while The Nativity Story depicts the Magi’s
visit to King Herod, it omits Herod’s consultation with the scribes and the
Historical purists may object to the juxtaposition of the shepherds and the wise men on the night of Christmas, though this conflation is a well-established tradition in depicting the Nativity. The broad comic-relief use of the Magi may seem jarring to some; certainly it underscores the family-film milieu.
Yet all of these are comparatively minor issues in a film that is bound to become regular Advent and Christmas viewing for countless Catholic and Protestant families. I know it will be for our family. We’ll still watch It’s a Wonderful Life, but now we’ll also have The Nativity Story, just as we have The Miracle Maker for Easter.
The Nativity Story has been a long time coming. It’s a most welcome addition now that it’s finally here.
Content advisory: Brief, mostly implied deadly menace to infants; a Jewish girl taken forcibly from her parents; a couple of fairly brief, non-graphic, but somewhat intense childbirth scenes. Might be too much for sensitive children.
chief critic of DecentFilms.com.
Copyright © 2013 EWTN News, Inc. All rights reserved.