Current Issue

Print Edition: May 19, 2013

Sign-up for our E-letter!



 

  • Donate
  • Archives
  • Blogs
  • Store
  • Resources
  • Advertise
  • Jobs
  • Radio
  • Subscribe
  • Make This
    My Homepage
  • Resources
  • Arts & Entertainment
  • Books
  • Commentary
  • Culture of Life
  • Education
  • In Person
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Sunday Guides
  • Travel
  • Vatican
  • Dan Burke
  • Jeanette DeMelo
  • Edward Pentin
  • Mark Shea
  • Matthew Warner
  • Jimmy Akin
  • Matt & Pat Archbold
  • Simcha Fisher
  • Tito Edwards
  • Jennifer Fulwiler
  • Steven D. Greydanus
  • Tom Wehner
  • Our Latest Show
  • About the Show
  • About the Register
  • Donate
  • Subscribe
  • Stations
  • Schedule
  • Other EWTN Shows
  • Advertising Overview
  • Editorial Calendar
  • Order Web Ad
  • Order Print Ad
Print Article | Email Article | Write To Us
Print Edition » News

Vatican: Bishop Fellay’s Words ‘Unacceptable’

SSPX Claims Inflammatory Comments Were Misinterpreted

  • Tweet
by Edward Pentin, Rome Correspondent Monday, Jan 21, 2013 5:44 PM Comments (4)

VATICAN CITY — The Vatican has said that a recent comment by the head of the traditionalist Society of St. Pius X describing the Jews as "enemies of the Church" is "absolutely unacceptable," although the SSPX has stressed that the comment was misinterpreted by the media.

In a talk Dec. 28 at Our Lady of Mount Carmel Chapel in New Hamburg, Ontario, Bishop Bernard Fellay said that groups "outside the Church, who were clearly during centuries enemies of the Church," were opposed to the reconciliation of the breakaway society with the Church. His reference to "groups" was apparently a reference he had made earlier in the talk to "the Jews, the Masons, the modernists."

Vatican spokesman Father Federico Lombardi responded in an interview with Vatican Radio by saying, "It is absolutely unacceptable, impossible, to define the Jews as enemies of the Church." He said that the "magisterial Tradition, the popes and the Church, spanning decades, have been united in their commitment to interreligious dialogue, showing that it is absolutely not possible" to speak of Jews in such a way.

Father Lombardi reaffirmed the position of the Church towards the Jews, saying it has been authoritatively expressed in the Second Vatican Council document Nostra Aetate (In Our Time), and he went on to stress how popes have repeatedly demonstrated the importance of dialogue with Jews. Particularly significant in this sense, he noted, were the visits of John Paul II and Benedict XVI to synagogues and the Western Wall.

Venerable Pope Paul VI wrote in Nostra Aetate, his 1965 declaration on the relation of the Church to non-Christian religions: "The Church reproves every form of persecution against whomsoever it may be directed. Remembering, then, her common heritage with the Jews and moved not by any political consideration, but solely by the religious motivation of Christian charity, she deplores all hatreds, persecutions, displays of anti-Semitism leveled at any time or from any source against the Jews" (15).

In a July 2012 interview with the Register, Archbishop J. Augustine DiNoia, vice president of the Pontifical Commission "Ecclesia Dei," said, "If (the SSPX) believes Nostra Aetate is being badly interpreted, then they have to get into the battle to correctly interpret it. Rather than walk away from the field, they have to play the game."

Father Lombardi also singled out Pope Benedict’s visits to the synagogue in Cologne, Germany, in 2005, the synagogue in New York in 2008 and the synagogue of Rome in 2010. All of these were "very significant gestures of the Church’s good relations and dialogue with Jews," the spokesman said.

Bishop Fellay’s words were immediately criticized in the Jewish world. The description of the Jews as "enemies of the Church," the Simon Wiesenthal Center said, "proves once more that deeply rooted anti-Semitism is at the heart of the theology" of the SSPX.

 

‘Out of Context’

Bishop Fellay could not be reached by the Register, but SSPX spokesman James Vogel said the comments had been misinterpreted.

"The statements were not taken out of context in the sense that Bishop Fellay actually said the words attributed to him," explained Vogel, editor of Angelus Press, which helps the SSPX’s U.S. district with communications. "They were, however, taken out of context insofar as the media has interpreted Bishop Fellay’s use of the term ‘Jews’ in a racial or political sense, whereas His Excellency meant it exclusively in a religious sense."

"In this religious sense, there is no difference between Jews and Muslims or Protestants, all of whom are ‘enemies of the Church’ insofar as they oppose the spread of the Catholic faith," Vogel continued. "The faith is what we are concerned with, not racial animosity or hatred of persons, as they are opposed to the charity which the Gospel commands of us."

He also added that the meaning of the word "enemy" is that of "adversary" or "opponent."

"If I can emphasize anything, it is that the SSPX wants and intends to keep peaceful relations with non-Catholic religions, while maintaining the Catholic doctrine that teaches that Our Lord Jesus Christ is the Messiah to whom every man must convert," Vogel said.

The Society of St. Pius X was founded by French Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre in 1970 in response to what he described as serious errors — religious tolerance vs. religious liberty, the de-emphasis of the extraordinary form of the Mass in favor of the Novus Ordo, ecumenism vs. exclusivism and the de-emphasis of papal supremacy in favor of collegiality — that had crept into the Church following the Second Vatican Council.

The long-standing strains in its relations with the Vatican were significantly aggravated in 1988, when Archbishop Lefebvre illicitly consecrated four bishops without the permission of Pope John Paul II.

 

Impasse Reached

Talks to reconcile the society with the Church have intensified under Benedict XVI, but three-year formal discussions seemed to have reached an impasse over the summer.

Reviewing the past year, Bishop Fellay said in his 40-minute talk that the society had received mixed signals from Rome. The Swiss bishop reiterated that the SSPX believes portions of the Second Vatican Council "opposed to what the Church has always taught" must be rejected and that Pope Benedict’s "hermeneutic of continuity" regarding the Council’s harmony with previous Church teachings is untenable because some of the Council teachings run "contrary" or are "opposed to Tradition."

Speaking without a text, the bishop said the mixed messages had been going on for years.

In 2011, the Vatican presented the SSPX with a "doctrinal preamble" that underlined fidelity to the Church and her teaching and proposed that SSPX leaders sign it in order to achieve full reconciliation. But Bishop Fellay said he had repeatedly told the Vatican that the contents of the preamble, especially passages on the modern Mass and the Council as expressed in the Catechism of the Catholic Church, were unacceptable.

The only reason the discussions continued, he said, was because others "very close to the Pope" had assured him that the Holy Father was not in agreement with official pronouncements from the Vatican.

Bishop Fellay said that retired Colombian Cardinal Dario Castrillon Hoyos, then-president of the Pontifical Commission "Ecclesia Dei," the office charged with bringing traditionalist Catholics back into full communion, told him in March 2009 that the society would be formally recognized. An October 2012 statement from "Ecclesia Dei" said formal negotiations are ongoing.

Despite the problems, Bishop Fellay said he remained hopeful for the situation in the long term, even if reconciliation will not be possible in the near future. "The situation is not desperate, no. It’s not worse than before. ... There’s some hope. I don’t think for right now, but, for us, we just continue." He added: "We must continue to pray to the Blessed Virgin Mary, pray the Rosary."

 

Relations Damaged?

Vogel said he could not comment on whether Bishop Fellay’s controversial comments would harm relations with the Vatican, but added: "Suffice it to say: They are probably well aware of our position on these matters, especially where we disagree on questions like ecumenism. We have made it clear many times we have no sympathy for anti-Semitism or hatred of persons."

Edward Pentin

writes from Rome.

Filed under

Comments

Post a Comment
Posted by Linda Nelson on Sunday, Feb 3, 2013 12:49 AM (EDT):

Matthew’s gospel reflects Jesus’ words, giving the true definition of “enemies of the Church”:  “He that is not with me, is against me: and he that gathereth not with me, scattereth.”  Being against Jesus, Son of Mary, Son of God, our Savior, means you are not with Him.  Jesus said it.  Are the Jews against the mission of the Catholic Church (to profess and to bring others to Christ, their Savior)?  Or are they with Jesus?  Many are seriously wondering whether the Church after Vatican II has decided to put Christian evangelization of the Jewish people aside while practicing some Modernistic form of “ecumenism” on them. 


The new Vatican II definition of ecumenism toward Jews has taken on the character of the attitude shown by aged grandparents talking about their apostate grandchildren:  “Let them be and just be friendly”, “Hands-off, they can get along”, “They don’t know what they’re doing”, “They’ll grow out of it”.  Such is very contrary to any movement that Christ would host.  Instead of seeking a dynamic, loving relationship to draw them to Christ, the Jews are being treated as if their descent into hell should be of no concern to the Church.  Those who point fingers at them for such acts of faithlessness are denigrated publicly.  That is anti-semitic.  And they are turning the tables to call the Society of St. Pius X anti-semitic! 


I wonder what would happen if all of a sudden one day the Pope called a meeting of all the Jewish Rabbis he’s been ecumenizing and told them: “Jesus said, ‘He who believes and is baptized will be saved. He who does not believe will be condemned.’  So I, as Pope of the Catholic Church, call upon you to repent of your sins, stop rejecting Christ, accept Him as your Savior, and be baptized today.” 


Did I get a laugh?  I have heard that the Church is now teaching that the Jews will be saved under the old law and because of that, need not turn to Christ at all.  (Christ, as you know, came to fulfill the law and created a new law, under which everyone now lives.)  No wonder the Church hierarchy is so touchy about SSPX, who are very much against this sort of ecumenism.  It is a change in Church teaching!  No wonder the Church is constantly vilifying SSPX, saying their words are “unacceptable”.  They are implying that evangelizing the Jews is somehow unChristian.  Why is the Catholic Church so cowardly?  Why does the Church no longer automatically think in terms of Christ, but diverts its thinking to political terms that are incompatible with Christianity?  There is a real problem here, and Bishop Fellay knows it.  Lord, have mercy on us all! 

Posted by John E. Boyle on Thursday, Feb 7, 2013 11:41 AM (EDT):

One must ask, is not Bishop Fellay and SSPX themselves an “enemy of the church”? Clearly by there own definition one can only conclude it to be so…

Posted by Bill Z Walton on Saturday, Feb 16, 2013 6:51 PM (EDT):

Spot on with this write-up, I actually believe that this site needs a great deal more attention. I’ll probably be returning to read more, thanks for the advice!| Bill Z Walton http://www.23test.com

Posted by wow gold news on Thursday, Mar 28, 2013 10:58 AM (EDT):

Originally Posted by TripleblackIm dealing with that problem. It dosen’t give me a drop down window to select my Mop beta behalf, It keeps auto defaulting to wow1 the cata try out account: LTry to change passwords. Worked for some people with this problem. wow gold news http://masterdjs.eu/index.php?do=/blog/2902/do-you-receive-the-mail-from-blizzard-official-site/

Post a Comment

By submitting this form, you give The National Catholic Register permission to publish this comment. Comments will be published at our discretion, and may be edited for clarity and length. For best formatting, please limit your response to one paragraph and don't hit "enter" to force line breaks.

Name:

Email:

Write your comment:

     

Notify me of follow-up comments.

Also in this Issue

  • Arts & Culture

    The Best Films of 2012
  • TV Picks 01.27.13
  • Commentary

    Abortion Mentality Factored Into Russia’s Adoption Ban
  • Three-Parent Embryo: Modifying Future Generations
  • No Big Deal?
  • Culture of Life

    ‘A Sign of My Love and Fidelity’
  • Helping Moms Like Princess Catherine
  • It Is Not Good for Man to Be Alone
  • Catholic Businesses Love Faith
  • Fundraising ‘Boot Camp’ Helps Those Called to Religious Life
  • Reaching Out in Hope
  • Why Do Catholics ...?
  • Education

    Keeping the Riches of Church Tradition in Print
  • In Person

    The State of Catholic Education
  • News

    Driving for the End Zone of Faith
  • ‘Civil Disobedience’ Would Expose HHS Mandate ‘Tyranny’
  • Andrew Cuomo’s Brave New 'Roe'
  • Bishop Murphy: Cuomo ‘Excludes God’
  • Jindal’s Contraception Contradiction
  • No Ordinary First Year for U.S. Anglican Ordinariate
  • Faith and Recovery After Typhoon Bopha
  • Opinion

    Words Do Matter, Promises Should Be Kept
  • State of the Register
  • Letters 01.27.13
  • Vatican

    The Catechism’s ‘Beautiful Adventure’

Most Popular Now

  • Most Read
  • Most Commented
  • Culture of Life

    Age-Old Prayer Gains More Pray-ers (7312)
  • Commentary

    ‘Gay Marriage’ or Religious Freedom: You Can’t Have Both (7239)
  • Arts & Entertainment

    ‘Verily’ Promotes True Femininity (4390)
  • Culture of Life

    Honor Our Lady of Fatima: Spend ‘A Day With Mary’ (3450)
  • Opinion

    Pentecost, Prudence and Immigration Reform (3296)
  • Opinion

    Hope Amid Horror (2107)
  • Culture of Life

    Moms, Imitate the Mother of God’s Virtues (2097)
  • Culture of Life

    Honor Mom (1583)
  • Sunday Guides

    Imagine There’s No Heaven? (1347)
  • Sunday Guides

    The Holy Spirit’s Two Comings (1155)
  • Commentary

    ‘Gay Marriage’ or Religious Freedom: You Can’t Have Both (126)
  • Opinion

    Pentecost, Prudence and Immigration Reform (53)
  • Culture of Life

    Honor Our Lady of Fatima: Spend ‘A Day With Mary’ (35)
  • Culture of Life

    Age-Old Prayer Gains More Pray-ers (20)
  • Opinion

    Hope Amid Horror (11)
  • Sunday Guides

    Imagine There’s No Heaven? (7)
  • Culture of Life

    Honor Mom (5)
  • Culture of Life

    Moms, Imitate the Mother of God’s Virtues (4)
  • Culture of Life

    Kansas for Life (1)
  • Culture of Life

    The Gift of the Holy Spirit (0)
 
Close

Free Newsletter Sign-Up

Enter your e-mail address below to receive the latest news and blog posts in your inbox each day.

As part of this free service you will receive occasional free offers from us. We won’t share your information, and you can unsubscribe at anytime.
Click here if you don't want this message to show again.

National Catholic Register

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Subscriptions
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Press Releases
  • RSS Daily Register
  • RSS Bloggers
  • RSS Print
  • Contact
  • Jobs

Copyright © 2013 EWTN News, Inc. All rights reserved.
Reproduction of material from this website without written permission is strictly prohibited.
Accessed from 107.22.127.92