Current Issue

Print Edition: February 12, 2012

 



3 Free Issues!

Try the Register at no risk. Click here.

  • Donate
  • Archives
  • Blogs
  • Store
  • Resources
  • Advertise
  • Jobs
  • Radio
  • Subscribe
  • Make This
    My Homepage
  • Resources
  • Christmas Music
  • Arts & Entertainment
  • Books
  • Commentary
  • Culture of Life
  • Education
  • In Person
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Sunday Guides
  • Travel
  • Vatican
  • Dan Burke
  • Edward Pentin
  • Mark Shea
  • Matthew Warner
  • Jimmy Akin
  • Matt & Pat Archbold
  • Simcha Fisher
  • Tito Edwards
  • Jennifer Fulwiler
  • Steven D. Greydanus
  • Tim Drake
  • Tom Wehner
  • Our Latest Show
  • About the Show
  • About the Register
  • Donate
  • Subscribe
  • Stations
  • Schedule
  • Other EWTN Shows
  • Advertising Overview
  • Editorial Calendar
  • Order Web Ad
  • Order Print Ad
Print Article | Email Article | Write To Us
Print Edition » Commentary

Pride and Prejudice

One of the reasons skeptics reject Christian arguments is that they think the arguments are meant to withstand even the most rigorous skepticism.

Share
by Melinda Selmys, Register correspondent Tuesday, Jun 12, 2007 8:00 AM Comment

One of the reasons skeptics reject Christian arguments is that they think the arguments are meant to withstand even the most rigorous skepticism.

They see God’s existence as so unlikely and so disagreeable that it must be proven beyond all possible doubt if it is to be given a serious hearing at all. This must be undermined before any fruitful discussion can begin.

We must show that we are aware of the weaknesses in our arguments. Otherwise, the skeptic will almost certainly fail to appreciate their strengths. Admit that there are no absolutely unanswerable arguments proving God’s existence, but that there is more than sufficient evidence that belief is not unreasonable or stupid. Then try to move God out of the realm of the abstract and into the realm of reality.

Although the argument from authority is weak if you want philosophical certainty, there are a million things that we take on authority, and we act as though they were true. The existence of China, for example, if we don’t happen to have been there.

Of course the good skeptic will point out that there is a difference: If it became important enough, they could buy an airplane ticket to China and confirm that it exists. Fortunately, God is in the same category — and the ticket is reasonably priced.

All that is necessary is an open door — a prayer of willingness to have God prove himself on his own terms, and a readiness to look ridiculous in front of yourself (for who else is going to see you praying in your basement?). It is the prayer that started me in my faith, and I have seen it bear fruit in the lives of others. It works because it relies on God, not human cleverness, and it is the first step in building a relationship.

The actual wording of the prayer doesn’t matter much, so long as it expresses a desire to know God and his will. No one has faith on their own power, but the one thing we are all able to do is to turn to a God who might really be listening, and to ask him to help us know if he really is out there.

The skeptic will likely say that they have already done this: The vast majority of people have, at some point, in their hour of trial, called upon God. They begged his help, asked him to reveal himself — and yet, in spite of all those texts about seeking and finding, asking and receiving, “Nothing happened.”

It is difficult to say precisely what the skeptic expects to “happen,” and, beyond the ill thought-out scenarios that I treated in detail last week, he probably doesn’t have a very good idea either. This is reasonable. The request for God to show himself is more open than a demand for him to do his water-into-wine trick at the upcoming secular humanist’s convention. It remains problematic, however, when we fail to recognize that God works in his own time, and his own way — he is God, and he will not allow us to call the shots, lest we fall into that most absurd modern heresy and imagine ourselves to be “equal, adult partners” with the Creator of the universe.

We must be willing to petition instead of merely asking — not because God is a fascist control freak, but because our hearts and minds require time to become able to recognize his answers. In my own case, I prayed to know God regularly for three months before I understood what he was telling me.

In retrospect, I could see that he had been answering me all along.

The problem wasn’t that God wasn’t paying attention; it was that I needed more than a hundred repetitions of the same prayer, and a hundred divine responses before the message could get past the walls of skepticism and prejudice that I had built over the rest of my life.

It is also necessary that the potential convert be willing to become an actual convert. There’s no point in knocking at the gates of heaven if you’re going to flee the moment you’re invited in. Unfortunately, those who start praying in the expectation that nothing is really going to happen, tend to be scared off when they realize that there is a real Divine Person listening to them.

It can help to discuss this in advance, to talk about the changes they might have to make if God were to enter their life, and to build up a realistic portrait of Christian life. In some cases they will still choose to reject the God they find.

Then there is little you can do — except to keep them in your prayers, and to trust God.

Melinda Selmys writes from

Etibicoke, Ontario.

Subscribe to the National Catholic Register!  Click here to begin a trial subscription to the print edition, and receive 3 free issues with no risk and no obligation.

Filed under

Comments

Post a Comment

Post a Comment

By submitting this form, you give The National Catholic Register permission to publish this comment. Comments will be published at our discretion, and may be edited for clarity and length. For best formatting, please limit your response to one paragraph and don't hit "enter" to force line breaks.

Name:

Email:

Write your comment:

     

Notify me of follow-up comments.

Also in this Issue

  • Arts & Culture

    TV Picks June 17 - 23
  • Renaissance on the River
  • DVD Picks & Passes
  • Commentary

    Minimum Daily Requirement Christianity
  • The 10 Paradoxes of Fatherhood
  • Culture of Life

    Thank God for Paternal Instincts
  • Leadership by Love
  • The Law of God’s Action
  • Everything Changes When Christ Moves in
  • Thought of Priesthood? Oh, Yes
  • Education

    School’s Out, But Spiritual Growth Is In
  • Campus Watch
  • In Person

    How to Be a Father
  • News

    Court vs. Parents
  • ‘Abortion Rights Is an Evil Agenda’
  • World Media Watch
  • Slain Iraqi Priest’s Heroic Witness
  • No Amnesty For the Unborn
  • Opinion

    Letters to the Editors 06.17.2007
  • Common Nonsense
  • Paris, Call Rudy
  • Vatican

    Weekly Catechesis 06.17.2007
  • Vatican Media Watch
  • The Secret of Sant’Egidio’s Success

Most Popular Now

  • Most Read
  • Most Commented
  • Blogs

    Why My Big Family Is Not Overpopulating the Earth (16459)
  • Daily News

    160-Plus Bishops Speak Out Against HHS Mandate (12771)
  • Daily News

    EWTN Files Suit to Block Contraception Mandate (12062)
  • Blogs

    Komen & Planned Parenthood: The Real Lesson (10699)
  • Blogs

    Inside the Mind of Evil: Obama Administration's HHS Decision (10034)
  • Daily News

    How to Beat the Devil (9787)
  • Blogs

    Spokeswoman of Evil Speaks! (8949)
  • Daily News

    Rubio Introduces Bill to Protect Church Organizations Against Obama's Mandate (7798)
  • Blogs

    Inside the Mind of Evil: Obama Administration's HHS Decision (138)
  • Blogs

    Why My Big Family Is Not Overpopulating the Earth (134)
  • Blogs

    Catholics, Get Ready to Suffer (108)
  • Blogs

    Why I'm Donating to Susan G. Komen - UPDATED (105)
  • Daily News

    160-Plus Bishops Speak Out Against HHS Mandate (104)
  • Blogs

    Which Disney Villain is the Most Evil? (96)
  • Daily News

    EWTN Files Suit to Block Contraception Mandate (89)
  • Blogs

    UPDATE #2: Democrats double down on contraception (86)

E-mail Signup

Receive our free e-mail updates!

As part of this free service, you will receive occasional special offers

 

National Catholic Register

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Archives
  • Subscriptions
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Press Releases
  • RSS Daily Register
  • RSS Bloggers
  • RSS Print
  • Contact
  • Jobs

Copyright © 2012 EWTN News, Inc. All rights reserved.
Reproduction of material from this website without written permission is strictly prohibited.
Accessed from 38.107.179.230