Current Issue

Print Edition: February 12, 2012

 



3 Free Issues!

Try the Register at no risk. Click here.

  • Donate
  • Archives
  • Blogs
  • Store
  • Resources
  • Advertise
  • Jobs
  • Radio
  • Subscribe
  • Make This
    My Homepage
  • Resources
  • Christmas Music
  • Arts & Entertainment
  • Books
  • Commentary
  • Culture of Life
  • Education
  • In Person
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Sunday Guides
  • Travel
  • Vatican
  • Dan Burke
  • Edward Pentin
  • Mark Shea
  • Matthew Warner
  • Jimmy Akin
  • Matt & Pat Archbold
  • Simcha Fisher
  • Tito Edwards
  • Jennifer Fulwiler
  • Steven D. Greydanus
  • Tim Drake
  • Tom Wehner
  • Our Latest Show
  • About the Show
  • About the Register
  • Donate
  • Subscribe
  • Stations
  • Schedule
  • Other EWTN Shows
  • Advertising Overview
  • Editorial Calendar
  • Order Web Ad
  • Order Print Ad
Print Article | Email Article | Write To Us
Print Edition » Opinion

People vs. Politicians

When politicians explain their “pro-choice” position, it makes sense. If women are pregnant and have few options, why shackle them further by limiting their choices?

Share
by The Editors, Register correspondent Tuesday, May 08, 2007 8:00 AM Comment

When politicians explain their “pro-choice” position, it makes sense. If women are pregnant and have few options, why shackle them further by limiting their choices? 

But talk to real people instead of politicians, and the picture changes.

This week, we will compare what politicians say to what actually happens in the lives of women who carry out the logic of the “pro-choice” position.  This is one in a series of editorials in the wake of the Carhart v. Gonzales decision upholding a federal ban on partial-birth abortion. In his majority opinion in that case, Justice Anthony Kennedy wrote that the Supreme Court was motivated by two principles: respect for life and concern for women.

 “Respect for human life finds an ultimate expression in the bond of love the mother has for her child,” he wrote. “It is self-evident that a mother who comes to regret her choice to abort must struggle with grief more anguished and sorrow more profound when she learns, only after the event, what she once did not know: that she allowed a doctor to pierce the skull and vacuum the fast-developing brain of her unborn child.”

Presidential candidate Sen. Barack Obama was swift to denounce that decision. Obama wants partial-birth abortion to be legal.

“I strongly disagree with today’s Supreme Court ruling,” he said in a statement. “I am extremely concerned that this ruling will embolden state legislatures to enact further measures to restrict a woman’s right to choose, and that the conservative Supreme Court justices will look for other opportunities to erode Roe v. Wade, which is established federal law and a matter of equal rights for women.”

He should listen to Dr. Alveda King, daughter of slain civil rights leader A.D. King, and niece of Martin Luther King. She’s the national spokeswoman of Silent No More’s campaign in which women are telling the world exactly what the court’s opinion said: Their abortions deeply hurt them.

 “I and my deceased children are victims of abortion,” she said, “The Roe v. Wade decision has adversely affected the lives of my entire family. I pray often for deliverance from the pain caused by my decision to abort my baby.”

Presidential candidate Sen. Hillary Clinton also wants partial-birth abortion to remain legal. She ignored the after-effects of abortion when she denounced the Supreme Court’s decision.

“As the Supreme Court recognized in Roe v. Wade in 1973, this issue is complex and highly personal,” she said. “The rights and lives of women must be taken into account.”

Actress and one-time covergirl Jennifer O’Neill also wants women to be taken into account. When she had an abortion, “I was told a lie from the pit of hell — that my baby was just a blob of tissue,” she said. “The aftermath of abortion can be equally deadly for both mother and unborn child. [A woman who has an abortion] is sentenced to bear that for the rest of her life.”

Speaker of the U.S. House Nancy Pelosi wants partial-birth abortion to remain legal. “The federal ban on abortion procedures is extreme, it violates a woman’s right to make private medical decisions, and it endangers women’s health,” she said, using language taken verbatim from the pro-abortion groups which fund her.

Pelosi should read the website of Father Frank Pavone. He works with women who have had abortions — including Norma McCorvey. She was the “Roe” of Roe v. Wade but is now a pro-life activist. His site quotes women’s words about their abortions:

“I was afraid of being abandoned by my boyfriend,” said one woman who, like so many, was coerced into abortion by the man who impregnated her. “Our engagement ended violently after the abortion.”

“I have been a feminist for 18 years,” said another woman. “The abortion, I feel, was the singularly most evil thing I have ever done. Yet I feel duped. I am enraged at Planned Parenthood and NOW, etc. I bought the pro-choice rhetoric. … I am angry now that I had that choice.”

“I didn’t want to lose my boyfriend,” said another. “He left two months later. Planned Parenthood didn’t tell me it was a baby. ‘It’s a mass of tissue,’ they said.”

“I was pro-choice until the abortion,” said another. “That changed my mind.”

“The day I killed my baby nine years ago is something I think of every day,” said another woman. “I will always regret it and long for my baby.”

We have a prediction: In our lifetime will come a time when people will be as ashamed of their support for pro-abortion politicians as others have been for supporting slavery or segregation. Suddenly, it will be impossible to find anyone who will admit to voting for politicians like Obama, Clinton and Pelosi.

Pro-lifers should spare as many people as possible that shame. Share with others the rebuttals real people give to the politicians.

Go to “SilentNoMoreAwareness.org” and click on “Testimonies.”

Subscribe to the National Catholic Register!  Click here to begin a trial subscription to the print edition, and receive 3 free issues with no risk and no obligation.

Filed under

Comments

Post a Comment

Post a Comment

By submitting this form, you give The National Catholic Register permission to publish this comment. Comments will be published at our discretion, and may be edited for clarity and length. For best formatting, please limit your response to one paragraph and don't hit "enter" to force line breaks.

Name:

Email:

Write your comment:

     

Notify me of follow-up comments.

Also in this Issue

  • Arts & Culture

    TV Picks May 13 - 19
  • If Coolness Counts, What’s the Score?
  • DVD Picks & Passes
  • Christianity and Hollywood: An Italian’s-Eye View
  • Commentary

    Interior Life Of Atheism
  • Ordaining Relativism
  • Boris and the Devils
  • Culture of Life

    Unconditional love, Unrelenting prayer
  • Who Cares About Apathy?
  • Northern Lights
  • Faithful Families Flourish
  • Education

    Campus Watch 05.13.2007
  • In Person

    The Necessary Precedent
  • News

    Unconscionable
  • Abortion Breast-Cancer Link
  • World Media Watch 05.13.2007
  • Mary And The Muslims
  • House Passes Hate-Crimes Bill
  • What I Saw… at the Mega Missions in Mexico
  • Opinion

    Letters to the Editor 05.13.2007
  • Our Mother’s Day
  • Vatican

    Weekly Catechesis
  • Vatican Media Watch 05.13.2007
  • Islam and the Holy See

Most Popular Now

  • Most Read
  • Most Commented
  • Blogs

    Why My Big Family Is Not Overpopulating the Earth (16582)
  • Daily News

    160-Plus Bishops Speak Out Against HHS Mandate (12816)
  • Daily News

    EWTN Files Suit to Block Contraception Mandate (12423)
  • Blogs

    Komen & Planned Parenthood: The Real Lesson (10736)
  • Blogs

    Inside the Mind of Evil: Obama Administration's HHS Decision (10091)
  • Daily News

    How to Beat the Devil (9794)
  • Blogs

    Spokeswoman of Evil Speaks! (9019)
  • Daily News

    Rubio Introduces Bill to Protect Church Organizations Against Obama's Mandate (7831)
  • Blogs

    Inside the Mind of Evil: Obama Administration's HHS Decision (141)
  • Blogs

    Why My Big Family Is Not Overpopulating the Earth (134)
  • Blogs

    Catholics, Get Ready to Suffer (108)
  • Blogs

    Why I'm Donating to Susan G. Komen - UPDATED (105)
  • Daily News

    160-Plus Bishops Speak Out Against HHS Mandate (104)
  • Blogs

    Which Disney Villain is the Most Evil? (96)
  • Daily News

    EWTN Files Suit to Block Contraception Mandate (90)
  • Blogs

    UPDATE #2: Democrats double down on contraception (87)

E-mail Signup

Receive our free e-mail updates!

As part of this free service, you will receive occasional special offers

 

National Catholic Register

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Archives
  • Subscriptions
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Press Releases
  • RSS Daily Register
  • RSS Bloggers
  • RSS Print
  • Contact
  • Jobs

Copyright © 2012 EWTN News, Inc. All rights reserved.
Reproduction of material from this website without written permission is strictly prohibited.
Accessed from 38.107.179.233