Current Issue

Print Edition: February 12, 2012

 



3 Free Issues!

Try the Register at no risk. Click here.

  • Donate
  • Archives
  • Blogs
  • Store
  • Resources
  • Advertise
  • Jobs
  • Radio
  • Subscribe
  • Make This
    My Homepage
  • Resources
  • Christmas Music
  • Arts & Entertainment
  • Books
  • Commentary
  • Culture of Life
  • Education
  • In Person
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Sunday Guides
  • Travel
  • Vatican
  • Dan Burke
  • Edward Pentin
  • Mark Shea
  • Matthew Warner
  • Jimmy Akin
  • Matt & Pat Archbold
  • Simcha Fisher
  • Tito Edwards
  • Jennifer Fulwiler
  • Steven D. Greydanus
  • Tim Drake
  • Tom Wehner
  • Our Latest Show
  • About the Show
  • About the Register
  • Donate
  • Subscribe
  • Stations
  • Schedule
  • Other EWTN Shows
  • Advertising Overview
  • Editorial Calendar
  • Order Web Ad
  • Order Print Ad
Print Article | Email Article | Write To Us
Print Edition » Culture of Life

Overextended

Share
by Tom and Caroline McDonald, Register correspondent Tuesday, Sep 30, 2008 1:29 PM Comment

Every time I turn around, my wife has accepted another invitation on our behalf. When I complain, she says I’m being selfish. Is she right?

This sounds like a case of good intentions gone wild. In our age of Blackberrys, texting and iPhones, we have developed a sense of immediacy when it comes to communicating. We feel the burden to reply to every message ASAP. When we send one, we get annoyed if the other person does not reply within minutes. We have an expectation that our messages are getting through to the person instantaneously, thanks to modern technology, so what excuse does he or she have for not getting back to us? (And snap to it, unless you have a very good excuse!)

Bundled with this unwarranted expectation is the notion that we must answer every social request immediately. If nothing is on our calendar (which we always have with us, thanks to our personal digital assistant), we must accept the invitation. It would be rude or dishonest to decline. But is this a valid concern?

We don’t think so. First, even if nothing is on the calendar, I owe it to my spouse, out of respect for his time and wishes, not to accept an invitation without running it by him first — unless I am absolutely certain he would reply Yes. If there is any doubt whatsoever, it is unfair for me to blindside him with an obligation.

What about her accusation that you’re being selfish? Maybe you should be open to accepting more invitations, but neither spouse should push the other too hard in any direction.

And there is much to be said for protecting our time from the intrusions of the world. Couples and families need time to just be together, doing nothing in particular. A good practice is to take a look at the calendar, find a free weekend and block it out as “family time.” Preserve certain days as off-limits to outside obligations, just as you might put a certain percentage of your income in the bank. Then, when an invitation comes along, you can honestly reply that you have other plans. Plans for family time are as real and important as any other kind.

We are under no obligation to explain ourselves to the person extending the invitation. We shouldn’t feel the need to justify ourselves to them just because they invited us over. Simply reply that you have other plans and let it go at that.

Family time and couple time are precious. These times need to be guarded. Socializing has its place — in fact, it can be a great way to witness the faith — but a balance must be struck.

And, with the Lord’s help, that kind of balance is certainly achievable.

The McDonalds are family-life coordinators for the Archdiocese of Mobile, Alabama.

Subscribe to the National Catholic Register!  Click here to begin a trial subscription to the print edition, and receive 3 free issues with no risk and no obligation.

Filed under

Comments

Post a Comment

Post a Comment

By submitting this form, you give The National Catholic Register permission to publish this comment. Comments will be published at our discretion, and may be edited for clarity and length. For best formatting, please limit your response to one paragraph and don't hit "enter" to force line breaks.

Name:

Email:

Write your comment:

     

Notify me of follow-up comments.

Also in this Issue

  • Arts & Culture

    DVD Picks and Passes
  • TV Picks October 5-11, 2008
  • Video Games and Your Family
  • Commentary

    The Centrality of Sacrifice
  • Denver’s Partisan Theology
  • Culture of Life

    New Saints and the Place Where They Live
  • Smells Like Holy Spirit
  • Mysteries Unlocked
  • Education

  • In Person

    Meeting God in Outer Space
  • News

    Preaching to the Choir
  • Defending Pius XII
  • NASA Catholics Mark 50 Years
  • Catholic Health-Care Solutions
  • From Gordon Gekko to Investing With a Conscience
  • Candidates Differ On Vouchers
  • Opinion

    Letters 10.05.2008
  • Publisher’s Note
  • Voter Traps
  • Vatican

    St. Paul and the Twelve
  • What to Expect From the Synod

Most Popular Now

  • Most Read
  • Most Commented
  • Blogs

    Why My Big Family Is Not Overpopulating the Earth (16394)
  • Daily News

    160-Plus Bishops Speak Out Against HHS Mandate (12752)
  • Daily News

    EWTN Files Suit to Block Contraception Mandate (11823)
  • Blogs

    Komen & Planned Parenthood: The Real Lesson (10682)
  • Blogs

    Inside the Mind of Evil: Obama Administration's HHS Decision (10005)
  • Daily News

    How to Beat the Devil (9780)
  • Blogs

    Spokeswoman of Evil Speaks! (8912)
  • Daily News

    Rubio Introduces Bill to Protect Church Organizations Against Obama's Mandate (7788)
  • Blogs

    Inside the Mind of Evil: Obama Administration's HHS Decision (138)
  • Blogs

    Why My Big Family Is Not Overpopulating the Earth (134)
  • Blogs

    Catholics, Get Ready to Suffer (108)
  • Blogs

    Why I'm Donating to Susan G. Komen - UPDATED (105)
  • Daily News

    160-Plus Bishops Speak Out Against HHS Mandate (104)
  • Blogs

    Which Disney Villain is the Most Evil? (96)
  • Daily News

    EWTN Files Suit to Block Contraception Mandate (87)
  • Blogs

    UPDATE #2: Democrats double down on contraception (86)

E-mail Signup

Receive our free e-mail updates!

As part of this free service, you will receive occasional special offers

 

National Catholic Register

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Archives
  • Subscriptions
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Press Releases
  • RSS Daily Register
  • RSS Bloggers
  • RSS Print
  • Contact
  • Jobs

Copyright © 2012 EWTN News, Inc. All rights reserved.
Reproduction of material from this website without written permission is strictly prohibited.
Accessed from 38.107.179.234