Current Issue

Print Edition: February 12, 2012

 



3 Free Issues!

Try the Register at no risk. Click here.

  • Donate
  • Archives
  • Blogs
  • Store
  • Resources
  • Advertise
  • Jobs
  • Radio
  • Subscribe
  • Make This
    My Homepage
  • Resources
  • Christmas Music
  • Arts & Entertainment
  • Books
  • Commentary
  • Culture of Life
  • Education
  • In Person
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Sunday Guides
  • Travel
  • Vatican
  • Dan Burke
  • Edward Pentin
  • Mark Shea
  • Matthew Warner
  • Jimmy Akin
  • Matt & Pat Archbold
  • Simcha Fisher
  • Tito Edwards
  • Jennifer Fulwiler
  • Steven D. Greydanus
  • Tim Drake
  • Tom Wehner
  • Our Latest Show
  • About the Show
  • About the Register
  • Donate
  • Subscribe
  • Stations
  • Schedule
  • Other EWTN Shows
  • Advertising Overview
  • Editorial Calendar
  • Order Web Ad
  • Order Print Ad
Print Article | Email Article | Write To Us
Print Edition » Commentary

Creed, 11: One Baptism

Share
by Mark Shea, Register correspondent Friday, Apr 24, 2009 2:05 PM Comment

The creed tells us, “We acknowledge one baptism for the forgiveness of sins.”

This clause emphasizes a teaching of the ancient Church that would later be denied by the rise of anabaptism. Anabaptism taught that infant baptism was a waste of time and said that you must be baptized as an adult in order for baptism to be valid. It maintained that the only thing that baptism really counts for is a sign showing you are serious about following Christ.

In short, anabaptism teaches that baptism is something we do for God, not something he does for us. So it insisted that those baptized as infants needed to be re-baptized as adults since they couldn’t have made an intelligent profession of faith as infants and, therefore, baptism could not have done them any good.

The apostolic doctrine that there is “one baptism,” and not two as Anabaptists taught, goes all the way back to the Acts of the Apostles, in which we repeatedly find that not just adults but whole households were customarily baptized when the head of the household was.

In the ancient Mediterranean, that typically included not just children, but slaves, as well.

Paul, fully aware of this, has no difficulty declaring in Ephesians 4:4-6, “There is one body and one Spirit, just as you were called to the one hope that belongs to your call, one Lord, one faith, one baptism, one God and Father of us all, who is above all and through all and in all.”

Similarly, the fact that baptism is for the forgiveness of sins is spelled out by Peter, who tells us “baptism … now saves you” (1 Peter 3:21). And Paul repeatedly tells us that baptism is not a mere sign of belief, but rather that “all of us who have been baptized into Christ Jesus were baptized into his death. We were buried therefore with him by baptism into death, so that as Christ was raised from the dead by the glory of the Father, we too might walk in newness of life” (Romans 6:3-4).

This understanding of baptism as sacramental — as doing something to us — is right at the core of the Catholic and biblical conception of the thing. And ironically, it has everything to do with refuting one of the great falsehoods about Catholic faith: the notion that the Church teaches “justification by works.”

The great irony is that anabaptism decoupled baptism from salvation yet still insisted on performing the rite as a pledge of the faith which alone could save.

The immediate practical effect of this was twofold:

First, it made baptism precisely the hollow ritual Anabaptists claimed Catholic baptism to be. Baptism no longer bore Christ’s salvific power. You just did it because you did it. Why it was necessary to tack this mandatory-but-empty outward observance on to the act of faith was never satisfactorily explained.

Second, it predicated salvation, not on the grace of Christ working through baptism, but upon our being clever enough to understand a particular theory of justification.

Catholics, in contrast, baptize babies and even profoundly mentally handicapped people.

To reject this is to say that a person can only have the grace of God if they are smart enough to master the doctrine of justification by faith. Catholics know that babies or severely mentally handicapped people are just as entitled to the grace of God as well-read, theologically sophisticated adults of high intelligence are: which is to say, not at all.

But God never said he’d give us his grace because we are smart. He said he’d give it to us because he loves us.

So we baptize in obedience to God and trust him to do the job through the grace of Christ, not through our cleverness in understanding justification by faith. All subsequent baptisms just get you wet.

Some may find it hard to grasp the awesome nature of baptism, especially if they have been schooled in current notions of the sacraments as mere communal celebrations of our “Us”-ness and not miraculous acts of the blessed Trinity conferring his eternal life upon mortal flesh.

For Paul, who was, like most of the first generation of Christians, an adult convert, the miracle of baptism was still fresh. To have toiled your life long with a burden of sin on your conscience; to have “kicked against the goads” and persecuted innocent people in your zeal to defeat him whom your conscience told you was the Messiah; and finally, to receive, not a fiery curse from the heavens, but complete forgiveness of sins and everlasting life — what words of thanks are sufficient?

But that is precisely what baptism confers on every human being from the sleepiest baby to Hans Frank, the gauleiter (governor) of Poland who oversaw the murder of 2 million human beings: the forgiveness of all sin and everlasting life. It’s still amazing!

Mark Shea is the content editor

for CatholicExchange.com.

Subscribe to the National Catholic Register!  Click here to begin a trial subscription to the print edition, and receive 3 free issues with no risk and no obligation.

Filed under

Comments

Post a Comment

Post a Comment

By submitting this form, you give The National Catholic Register permission to publish this comment. Comments will be published at our discretion, and may be edited for clarity and length. For best formatting, please limit your response to one paragraph and don't hit "enter" to force line breaks.

Name:

Email:

Write your comment:

     

Notify me of follow-up comments.

Also in this Issue

  • Arts & Culture

    TV Picks 05.03.2009
  • DVD Picks & Passes 05.03.2009
  • Priest Covers All the Angles
  • Commentary

    Identity, Part 3: The Sacramental Self
  • Visitation Rights
  • Culture of Life

    Join Benedict in the Holy Land
  • Vicarious Kin
  • Clean Enough
  • Grants and Graces
  • St. Paul, Accompany Us
  • Education

    TV’s Monastery
  • In Person

    Popular Preacher Returns
  • News

    Emma, the Pope and the President
  • Sebelius’ Abortion Money
  • Homeland Security: Pro-Life a Threat
  • Religious Visitators, Round 2
  • Marriage in the Balance
  • Opinion

    Letters 05.03.2009
  • Emma’s Plea
  • Not Entitled to Your Opinion
  • Vatican

    Love Overcomes Sin and Death
  • Sacred Art Makes Good TV

Most Popular Now

  • Most Read
  • Most Commented
  • Blogs

    Ten Reasons There Are No Women in Hell (16931)
  • Blogs

    Why My Big Family Is Not Overpopulating the Earth (15967)
  • Daily News

    160-Plus Bishops Speak Out Against HHS Mandate (12583)
  • Blogs

    Komen & Planned Parenthood: The Real Lesson (10565)
  • Blogs

    Inside the Mind of Evil: Obama Administration's HHS Decision (9784)
  • Daily News

    How to Beat the Devil (9751)
  • Blogs

    Spokeswoman of Evil Speaks! (8552)
  • Daily News

    Rubio Introduces Bill to Protect Church Organizations Against Obama's Mandate (7757)
  • Blogs

    Inside the Mind of Evil: Obama Administration's HHS Decision (134)
  • Blogs

    Why My Big Family Is Not Overpopulating the Earth (132)
  • Blogs

    Catholics, Get Ready to Suffer (108)
  • Blogs

    Why I'm Donating to Susan G. Komen - UPDATED (105)
  • Daily News

    160-Plus Bishops Speak Out Against HHS Mandate (103)
  • Blogs

    Which Disney Villain is the Most Evil? (94)
  • Blogs

    Spokeswoman of Evil Speaks! (85)
  • Blogs

    Ten Reasons There Are No Women in Hell (84)

E-mail Signup

Receive our free e-mail updates!

As part of this free service, you will receive occasional special offers

 

National Catholic Register

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Archives
  • Subscriptions
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Press Releases
  • RSS Daily Register
  • RSS Bloggers
  • RSS Print
  • Contact
  • Jobs

Copyright © 2012 EWTN News, Inc. All rights reserved.
Reproduction of material from this website without written permission is strictly prohibited.
Accessed from 38.107.179.233