BURNABY, British Columbia — A Catholic civil-rights group in Canada has published a parental-rights declaration as a way to assist parents in their struggles with school bureaucracies intent on normalizing homosexuality.
Canada legalized same-sex “marriage” in 2005.
Sean Murphy, British Columbia director of the Canadian Catholic Civil Rights League, published the “Declaration on the Authority of Parents and Guardians in the Education of their Children” on July 6 and distributed it to parents’ groups around the world, several of whom have published it.
Murphy’s move was triggered when parents failed to stop a British Columbia public-school district policy promoting homosexuality as a behavior that is as acceptable to heterosexuality. The school board condemned what it called “heterosexism.”
“Our specific concern is public schools will force children to learn morally objectionable material,” Murphy said. And while public schools pay lip service to the notion that parents are the primary educators of their children, “they increasingly behave as if they can overrule parental authority whenever they see fit.”
The declaration argues that procreation itself places on parents an obligation under natural law to rear and educate their children in their best spiritual, moral and physical interests, and with this “natural obligation comes a primordial and inalienable authority to educate their own children that is neither dependent upon nor derived from the broader community or the state.”
Public schools have long delivered accepted values, including religious ones, on behalf of society, but lately, said Murphy, they have become ostensibly secular and actually teaching a new morality that is in conflict with the morality and spirituality of many religious people.
Gordon World, spokesman for Parents’ Voice in Burnaby, B.C., welcomed the Canadian Catholic Civil Rights League declaration as he planned his campaign to get on the Burnaby school board and reverse the newly passed Policy 5.45.
World said Policy 5.45 is disguised as an anti-bullying measure but is actually an expression of the homosexual-rights lobby in British Columbia.
In the past, British Columbia’s homosexual-rights activists have gone to the Canadian Supreme Court to force a neighboring school district in Burnaby to put homosexual readers in school libraries (such as Priscilla Galloway’s Jennifer Has Two Daddies, aimed at 7- to 10-year-olds), to make the federal government pay spousal pension benefits to homosexual partners, and have the provincial Human Rights Tribunal make the provincial government put positive homosexual material in the public-school curriculum, as well as a social-justice course promoting diversity and tolerance. In the last case, the government did not wait for a ruling but agreed to these demands in a settlement.
‘Sit Down and Shut Up’
It was this “Corren settlement” (named after the plaintiffs, an activist homosexual couple) — followed up by homosexual-pressure groups — that led to Burnaby’s Policy 5.45. World says the policy is itself hostile to an identifiable group, namely religious believers.
“5.45 is not neutral,” said World. “It basically favors a certain segment of society; it places them on a pedestal and forces the rest of society to sit down and shut up.”
According to World, the program content accompanying Policy 5.45 extols the homosexual lifestyle as normal. It also ignores the downside of the lifestyle, such as the shorter life expectancy and other health risks.
The director of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, for example, recently affirmed that a majority of all new HIV infections are among homosexual men, even though they make up a small part of the population. “Men who have sex with men (MSM) account for just 2% of the U.S. population but represent more than half of all new infections in the United States,” said Dr. Thomas Frieden, during a June 2 ceremony commemorating 30 years since the discovery of the AIDS disease.
In Burnaby, however, any student who raises moral objections to the teaching that homosexuality is normal will be sanctioned by the school, says World. And children will be sent home with values opposed to those of their parents.
Parents’ Voice has urged parents to write formal requests to their children’s principals requesting “accommodation” — leave to miss classes when objectionable lessons are taught.
But Burnaby assistant superintendent Kevin Kaardal states that parents with concerns about content have been invited to speak to school principals. But World is skeptical of the outcome, since Kaardal has also stated that any accommodation cannot stand in the way of “curricular outcomes” set by the provincial Ministry of Education.
For example, says Kaardal, students can be absent from a biology class where animals are dissected, but they still must perform the dissection by computer or using a model.
Kaardal added: “The board does not ask parents or families to abandon or change their religious or moral commitments. Rather, it respects the rights of families to their own beliefs. The board’s focus is on ensuring that all of its communities are respected and valued.”
The policy, at one point, defines “heterosexism” as “the mistaken assumption that all people are heterosexual and that heterosexuality is superior and the norm by which all other sexual orientation and gender identities are measured.”
But World already has received a reply to his request from the district saying that “the curricular outcomes” desired by the provincial Ministry of Education must still be achieved by the students, even if they miss a particular lesson.
World said Parents’ Voice is considering taking the school district to the Human Rights Council, asserting their children’s religious and free-speech rights are being violated.
World is also contesting a seat on the school board in the fall elections and hopes other Parents’ Voice parents will join him.
Elsewhere in Canada, the issue has also arisen in Catholic schools. In Ontario, Canada’s largest province, and one whose Catholic school system is fully taxpayer-supported, the Halton board ran into public disapproval in January when it banned “gay-straight alliance clubs,” which the province’s public boards had adopted to meet government requirements for diversity. A storm of criticism from homosexual-rights groups led the board to reconsider its ban, but this sparked another storm of protest, this time from Catholic parents, who complained such clubs would flout Catholic doctrine. The board resolved the dilemma by creating clubs to bring students from many different backgrounds together. The dispute led to many pundits questioning the existence of the tax-supported Catholic system, but Catholics, many of whom are bloc-voting, recently arrived immigrants, have daunting political clout.
In Alberta, where Catholic schools are also fully funded by taxpayers, the Catholic system has also incurred public displeasure for modifying ministry of education teaching goals to fit Church teachings.
Quebec Catholic parents have also resisted the provincial government’s ethics curriculum, which they claim teaches a relativistic worldview. But Catholic observance in Quebec is the lowest in Canada, giving Catholic parents less political clout than in other provinces against a more aggressively secular government.
Steve Weatherbe writes from Victoria, British Columbia.
Subscribe to the National Catholic Register! Click here to begin a trial subscription to the print edition, and receive 3 free issues with no risk and no obligation.


Comments
Post a Comment
I hope all of you—the Catholic parents in Burnaby, the writer of this article, the readers who support this article—print it off, and store it for a decade or so. Then you’ll be able to look back and see that your views have been relegated to the dustbin of history, just like those of the white supremacists who opposed the civil rights movement. I would also remind you that while Jesus had nothing to say on the subject of homosexuality, He had an awful lot to say about not judging others, about love, and about treating others as you would be treated…or did we read two different bibles?
Sarah: Jesus also never expressly told people not to engage in incest, so the fact that he never expressly condemned homosexual behavior doesn’t necessarily mean he approved it.
Jesus demands that we love our neighbor, but love does not mean approving every behavior someone engages in. Jesus didn’t tell the woman who engaged in adultry that it was OK to do that. Rather, he loved her enough to tell her to “go, and sin no more.”
@Anonymous, it’s sad when Christians resort to comparing homosexual relationships with incestuous ones, you’re pretty much admitting you have no argument to stand on. You obviously don’t know any gay couples, or you’d have first hand knowledge that same-sex relationships have all the same love, trials, devotion, and frustrations as straight relationships. Your argument is predicated on the idea that being gay is sinful…who are you to decide what is sinful? I might remind you that the Bible also considered eating shellfish to be a sin, wearing mixed fibres to be a sin, and encouraged people to kill their neighbours if they didn’t observe the Sabbath. Modern Christians have different ideas about what constitutes a “sin” 3,000 years later (or we wouldn’t see so many of them on “all you can eat” shrimp night at Red Lobster)....why is it so hard to grasp the idea that gays and lesbians have as much right to relationships as straight people do?
As Catholics we do not rely only on the bible for direction, we follow the Tradition of the Church in conjunction with the teachings from the bible. We rely on her for spiritual guidance through the Holy Spirit, upheld by the Magistarium of the Church and the Holy Father. Through the Holy Spirit, the Catholic Church has developed moral doctrine, all of which can be found in the Catechism of the Catholic Church.
Absolute Truths:
1. Same-sex attraction is accepted by the Church.
2. The Church accepts those with same-sex attraction lovingly and tenderly
3. In the CCC same-sex attraction is defined as ‘disordered’, in the context that it is outside the realm of Natural Law (another important absolute truth)
4. Homosexuals are called to live a life of chastity, just as any heterosexuals would be, inside and outside the context of marriage.
5. Homosexual relationships cannot be equated to heterosexual relationships, as the natural consequence of a heterosexual relationship is children (most of the time).
6. Homosexuality has been around forever, more so in so called ‘enlightened’ societies, the Church has not changed her stance, just as her stance against abortion,euthanasia, IVF, surrogacy won’t change.
7. The Church has always been against discrimination of any kind.
8. Accepting the Faith as a Catholic means exactly that. Living out Truths are even more difficult. The acts of homosexuality are condemned. Just because society is accepting of a behaviour does not mean that it’s right. Does society regale the negative side to homosexual relationships? No. They are well documented.
“1. Same-sex attraction is accepted by the Church.”
Outright Lie.
“2. The Church accepts those with same-sex attraction lovingly and tenderly”
Outright Lie.
“3. In the CCC same-sex attraction is defined as ‘disordered’, in the context that it is outside the realm of Natural Law (another important absolute truth)”
While it may be true that the church defines it as such, that does not make it true. Homosexuality exists in nature. Now what?
“4. Homosexuals are called to live a life of chastity, just as any heterosexuals would be, inside and outside the context of marriage.”
Bologna. Hetero married couples are expected to multiply like rabbits.(see 5)
“5. Homosexual relationships cannot be equated to heterosexual relationships, as the natural consequence of a heterosexual relationship is children (most of the time).”
Bologna. That’s the same as saying Hetero marriages that don’t want or cannot have children cannot equate to marriages the do have children. Oh and lets just forget about adoption.
“6. Homosexuality has been around forever,”
How about that.. further proof of its natural existence.
” more so in so called ‘enlightened’ societies,”
Probably because, in unenlightened societies, homosexuals are murdered. That tends to lessen the population…
” the Church has not changed her stance, just as her stance against abortion,euthanasia, IVF, surrogacy won’t change.”
Everything changes.
“7. The Church has always been against discrimination of any kind.”
Bologna. Who can tell me the name of the group the church has discriminated against the most besides the LGBT comunity? If you guessed women, you’re right. Or does that not count? Women being church sanctioned property and all…
“8. Accepting the Faith as a Catholic means exactly that. Living out Truths are even more difficult. The acts of homosexuality are condemned.”
Why?
” Just because society is accepting of a behaviour does not mean that it’s right.”
I can play that game too. Just because the church condones the beating of ones wife and kids does not mean it’s right. (mine makes more sense though btw)
“Does society regale the negative side to homosexual relationships? No. They are well documented.”
Really? Source please.
KZKR,
Natural law pertains to creatures who can reason. The Old Catholic Encyclopedia quotes St. Thomas Aquinas when defining natural law: “According to St. Thomas, the natural law is ‘nothing else than the rational creature’s participation in the eternal law’ (I-II, Q. xciv).” Remember, many animals also eat their young. Better not to go there!
Your other accusations have been refuted here.
http://www.catholic.com/thisrock/2004/0407sbs.asp
http://www.catholic.com/library/Homosexuality.asp
“Really? Source please.”
Take a look at studies conducted by the CDC on this subject.
http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/topics/msm/
“Everything changes”
2 + 2 is still 4. The sun still rises in the East and sets in the West.
“If you guessed women, you’re right. Or does that not count? Women being church sanctioned property and all”
Outright lie!
Sexual activity between two people of the same sex is biologically unnatural, totally sterile and a complete rejection of the wisdom of the Author of all life when “... male and female He created them.” It’s not a matter of civil or human rights. It’s a complete denial of one’s personhood.
Post a Comment
By submitting this form, you give The National Catholic Register permission to publish this comment. Comments will be published at our discretion, and may be edited for clarity and length. For best formatting, please limit your response to one paragraph and don't hit "enter" to force line breaks.