Current Issue

Print Edition: June 16, 2013

Sign-up for our E-letter!



 

  • Donate
  • Archives
  • Blogs
  • Store
  • Resources
  • Advertise
  • Jobs
  • Radio
  • Subscribe
  • Make This
    My Homepage
  • Resources
  • Arts & Entertainment
  • Books
  • Commentary
  • Culture of Life
  • Education
  • In Person
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Sunday Guides
  • Travel
  • Vatican
  • Dan Burke
  • Jeanette DeMelo
  • Edward Pentin
  • Mark Shea
  • Matthew Warner
  • Jimmy Akin
  • Matt & Pat Archbold
  • Simcha Fisher
  • Tito Edwards
  • Jennifer Fulwiler
  • Steven D. Greydanus
  • Tom Wehner
  • Our Latest Show
  • About the Show
  • About the Register
  • Donate
  • Subscribe
  • Stations
  • Schedule
  • Other EWTN Shows
  • Advertising Overview
  • Editorial Calendar
  • Order Web Ad
  • Order Print Ad
Print Article | Email Article | Write To Us
Print Edition » Culture of Life

Calif. Mandates Contraception Coverage

  • Tweet
by Skip O'Neel, Register Correspondent Sunday, Oct 31, 1999 2:00 PM Comment

SACRAMENTO, Calif.-Gov. Gray Davis has signed into law dual provisions making California the 10th state to mandate contraception as a part of any prescription-drug package offered to employees by their employers.

Under the Women's Contraceptive Equity Act, employers will have to fund contraceptive benefits for their employees even if they have legitimate faith-based objections to artificial birth control.

A similar bill passed in 1998 included a “conscience clause” exempting religious employers and their subsidiaries. But the new conscience provision excludes only those organizations whose primary purpose is the inculcation of religious values and who primarily serve persons of the same faith. Many believe this will force Catholic hospitals, charities and parochial schools to provide contraceptive coverage since inculcating values is not their primary purpose, nor do they primarily serve Catholics.

The California Catholic Conference, along with Republicans, were rebuffed when they tried to reach a compromise with the authors of the act, Sen. Jackie Speier and Assemblyman Robert Hertzberg. Davis, Speier and Hertzberg are Democrats.

During the debate leading up to the final vote on the bills in the Assembly, Hertzberg was asked why he opposed the stronger conscience clause he had favored just the year before. He gave no reason other than to say, “There has to be a nexus between employment and faith.”

Republicans said this proved proponents simply want to force Catholic entities to go against the teachings of their faith. Indeed, Assemblywoman Audie Bock, an Independent from Oakland, and Assemblywoman Hannah-Beth Jackson, a Democrat from Santa Barbara, said the bills were needed because they would essentially force Catholic employers to provide contraception for their employees. They argued that, absent these bills, employers could “impose their morality” on employees.

Both bills passed with Catholics providing the margin of victory. Speier and 10 other Catholics in the state Senate, along with 14 Catholics in the Assembly, voted for the legislation to mandate contraception coverage. All are Democrats, though some Democrats voted against the bills and others abstained.

In a statement after the signing ceremony, bill sponsor Planned Parenthood Affiliates of California said, “Today common sense has prevailed. Women in California will now enter the new millennium free from the long-standing gender discrimination that currently exists in insurance prescription contraceptive benefits.”

Opponents agreed that this was about discrimination, but not the kind of discrimination those in favor of the law had in mind.

“It's the responsibility of the government to protect religious freedoms,” said Assemblyman Roy Ashburn, a Republican from Bakersfield and a Catholic. “And yet on this very issue, the authors and majority party were more interested in imposing their views on people who have deeply felt religious convictions to the contrary.”

The California Catholic Conference's executive director, Ned Dolejsi, agreed with this assessment. “It's naive to think that this is not their agenda,” he said. “They talk about us imposing our morality on employees, but if you work for Catholic Charities, were you not clear what Catholic Charities believed and stood for when you came to work for them? This is them imposing their moral agenda on us.”

Skip O'Neel is a free-lance writer living in Sacramento, California.

Filed under

Comments

Post a Comment

Post a Comment

By submitting this form, you give The National Catholic Register permission to publish this comment. Comments will be published at our discretion, and may be edited for clarity and length. For best formatting, please limit your response to one paragraph and don't hit "enter" to force line breaks.

Name:

Email:

Write your comment:

     

Notify me of follow-up comments.

Also in this Issue

  • Arts & Culture

    Prizer’s Video Picks
  • Sweeps Month Doesn’t Bring Out the Best
  • Commentary

  • Culture of Life

    Did You Know?
  • Mission Means 8 Hours a Day Outside Clinic
  • The Gospel Of Life
  • Nazareth Mosque Ruling Irks Christians and Muslims
  • Education

    Education Notebook
  • When Seminarians Meet Psychologists
  • John Michael Talbot’s Rocky Road to Peace
  • In Person

    Greetings from the Church in Hollywood
  • News

    Life Notes
  • In Mexico, a Feisty Movement Works to Keep the Flock Intact
  • Patron Saints of Halloween?
  • Barbara Nicolosi
  • Business Is Business, Within Limits
  • Whistling Past the Graveyard?
  • World Notes & Quotes
  • Hate Crime Act’s Demise Prompts Catholic Questions
  • U.S. Notes & Quotes
  • Questions for the Campaign
  • Get Into Politics, Bishops Urge Laity
  • Euthanasia and the ‘Brain Death’ Lie
  • Lay Preachers Take to the Streets
  • ‘Baby Step’ In Direction Of Unity
  • Opinion

    Letters
  • Editorial
  • Vatican

    ‘Our Era Is Not Capable of Transmitting its Spiritual Heritage’
  • Vatican Notes & Quotes
  • Papal Trip to Iraq Still On, But Date May Change
  • Martyrs Are a Sign of Hope For Europe, Synod Contends

Most Popular Now

  • Most Read
  • Most Commented
  • Culture of Life

    Checklist for Catholic Dads (7598)
  • Commentary

    Religious Freedom vs. Totalitarianism (3909)
  • Culture of Life

    A Parent’s Guide to Courtship (3797)
  • Education

    Stay Catholic at a Non-Catholic University (3468)
  • Opinion

    ‘Museum-Piece Christians’? (3274)
  • Arts & Entertainment

    The Irresistible Attraction of St. Anthony of Padua (2335)
  • Sunday Guides

    The Adventure of Corpus Christi (1770)
  • Commentary

    Faith of Our Fathers (1687)
  • Sunday Guides

    The Bad Company Jesus Keeps — and the Lives Changed by His Forgiveness (1531)
  • Sunday Guides

    Jesus Offers Life (1525)
  • Culture of Life

    A Parent’s Guide to Courtship (23)
  • Culture of Life

    Checklist for Catholic Dads (12)
  • Opinion

    ‘Museum-Piece Christians’? (10)
  • Education

    Stay Catholic at a Non-Catholic University (8)
  • Sunday Guides

    The Adventure of Corpus Christi (3)
  • Commentary

    Faith of Our Fathers (2)
  • News

    Abortion Battle Enters Final Phase in New York (2)
  • News

    Boy Scouts Lift Ban on Homosexual Youth (2)
  • Sunday Guides

    Jesus Offers Life (2)
  • Culture of Life

    Protectors of the Holy Land (1)
 
Close

Free Newsletter Sign-Up

Enter your e-mail address below to receive the latest news and blog posts in your inbox each day.

As part of this free service you will receive occasional free offers from us. We won’t share your information, and you can unsubscribe at anytime.
Click here if you don't want this message to show again.

National Catholic Register

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Subscriptions
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Press Releases
  • RSS Daily Register
  • RSS Bloggers
  • RSS Print
  • Contact
  • Jobs

Copyright © 2013 EWTN News, Inc. All rights reserved.
Reproduction of material from this website without written permission is strictly prohibited.
Accessed from 67.202.9.192