An Urgent Message from Fr. Owen Kearns LC, Publisher
What we deliver with our journalism, we cannot deliver without your generosity.
The National Catholic Register needs your help. Revenue from subscriptions and advertising can't keep up with the rising cost of payroll, printing, postage and other expenses. We must rely on donations to make up the difference. To continue our hard-hitting investigative reporting, we need your financial support. Please donate today.
...or click here to learn about donating to specific projects.
Donations to Circle Media are tax-deductible. (Photo credits/CNS)
February 24-March 1, 2008 Issue |
Posted 2/19/08 at 12:39 PM
“Paganism” is a term fraught with all sorts of connotations.
It originally meant something like “country dweller,”
“rustic” or even “hick.” That’s because (contrary to popular myth) Christianity
did not spread among the Hee Haw-watchers of antiquity, but among the city
dwellers and urban folk.
The very last people to receive the faith were the rural
folk who clung to the worship of the old gods and the customs of their
ancestors long after Christianity had become thoroughly established in the
cities.
So the term originally referred only to “country folk.”
However, because the country folk were devoted to the
various gods of the Gentiles, it came to mean something else: a worshipper of
non-Christian deities.
And as those deities receded into the past and became
conflated with the demons of both revelation and of the medieval imagination,
“pagan” came to take on a much darker significance.
It became fraught with imagery of devils, horned gods, and
all manner of wild witchery (which paganism was sometimes, in fact, fraught
with). To call somebody a “pagan” in this sense was no longer to describe where
they lived, but to say something desperately dark about their soul.
Finally, in these latter days, “pagan” has taken yet another
turn and is now used in some circles as a compliment. Among a growing number of
people, “pagan” now means “post-Christian religionist who is attempting to
rescue reverence for Nature from the hands of evil Judeo-Christian earth
rapists.”
The notion behind this version of “pagan” is that there was
once a magical far-off time when humans dwelt in harmony with Mother Earth,
everybody was comfortable with their various Jungian archetypes, and all was
well as we worshipped the “gods” and “goddesses” who both expressed the beauty
of Nature and got us in touch with our inmost selves (and lots of libido, to
boot).
Who needs all that stuff about sin, dying to self and the
need for redemption? The great blunder of the human race was when the old gods
were swept away by the evil Judeo-Christian God. We have to return to our
natural state of innocence with the gods (and especially the goddesses) of
Nature that reigned before God mucked everything up. Then we will find the
happiness we are all seeking.
The first thing to note about paganism, is the last thing
that I note: It is seeking something. Paganism is, according to G.K.
Chesterton, a search. Chesterton had a very high regard for pre-Christian
paganism. He famously said that paganism was the attempt to reach God through
the imagination. He declared, “Paganism was the largest thing in the world and
Christianity was larger; and everything else has been comparatively small.” The
thing it is seeking is the thing we all seek: the thing St. Thomas Aquinas says
we can’t not seek — happiness.
But that brings us to our second point: namely that paganism
takes two basic forms — pre-Christian and post-Christian.
Pre-Christian paganism was, says philosopher Peter Kreeft, a
virgin. Post-Christian paganism is, he adds, a divorcee. And that matters
enormously because there are two basic reasons people ask questions: to find
something out and to keep from finding something out.
Pre-Christian paganism was (for the most part) an attempt to
find God. It was (as we shall see in our next discussion) often alloyed with
all sorts of error and hampered by original sin. But the fundamental goal was a
search for God. As such, it was ordered toward reality, though much hampered in
the pursuit by the effects of sin.
Post-Christian paganism is, first and foremost, a search for
an escape from God. It is a hunt for the blessings of heaven without the
trouble of submitting to heaven. As such, it is ordered toward unreality,
though much hampered in the pursuit by the work of the Holy Spirit.
Now it should be noted here that merely living in the 21st
century does not automatically make you a post-Christian pagan. It is quite
possible for pre-Christian pagans to exist in this day and age. I well remember
a woman I worked with who was spurred by Joan Osborne’s song with the refrain
“What if God was one of us?” to remark: “Wouldn’t that be a cool idea for a
story?”
“What?” I queried.
“Well, suppose God became a human being. Wouldn’t that be a
great idea for a story?”
I remarked, “Yeah! You could call it ‘The Greatest Story
Ever Told’ or something.”
She had no clue that this was what Christianity taught. It
was, even at this date, news. And she was amazed.
But others are, in Chesterton’s phrase, “weary of hearing
what they have never yet heard.” These divorcee post-Christians are looking,
not for God, but for something — anything — else.
Understanding that is the essential first step. Next time,
we will discuss the next step.
Mark Shea is senior content editor for CatholicExchange.com.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Make a Donation now!
Insightful. Informative. Uncompromisingly faithful. The National Catholic Register is more than a newspaper. It’s a cause. Your support for the Register funds important journalism that helps to build a Culture of Life in our nation, and throughout the world. Help us promote the Church’s New Evangelization by donating to the National Catholic Register right now.