An Urgent Message from Fr. Owen Kearns LC, Publisher
What we deliver with our journalism, we cannot deliver without your generosity.
The National Catholic Register needs your help. Revenue from subscriptions and advertising can't keep up with the rising cost of payroll, printing, postage and other expenses. We must rely on donations to make up the difference. To continue our hard-hitting investigative reporting, we need your financial support. Please donate today.
...or click here to learn about donating to specific projects.
Donations to Circle Media are tax-deductible. (Photo credits/CNS)
February 17-23, 2008 Issue |
Posted 2/12/08 at 12:59 PM
Web Suggestions
First, congrats on the new website. It’s a million times
nicer than the old one.
Second, I would recommend making all online content
open-access. Many websites were initially catering to subscribers only: The
Economist and The New York Times websites were this way, though both have
recently changed. (The Wall Street Journal still charges for its online
content. We’ll see if Murdoch continues this practice.)
Recent marketing trends shift profit margins to advertising
and make all online content free. Just a suggestion, particularly for people
plugged in all day long at work.
Caleb O’Kray
Woodbridge, Virginia
Editor’s note: We need subscription revenue to stay in
business, but all our online access is free to subscribers.
Hear, Hear
Just a quick “Hear, hear!” in response to a letter written
to the editor in the Jan. 27 issue. It was a letter titled “Misguided Sisters.”
Nothing to add to it. I think it said it all.
Mrs. Robert M. Sledge
Omaha, Nebraska
Misguided Compassion
Your recent front-page article, “Victim’s Mom Battles
Death Penalty” (Jan. 27) on the death penalty left me stone cold, killed by
misguided compassion for evildoers instead of their victims.
In the entire article, there was not one word about the
innocent victims of horrific acts of violence, cruel and unusual acts of
torture, rape and murder against individuals who didn’t deserve to die,
who leave permanently grieving families, friends and communities. My
compassion is with them.
There was also no mention of sacred Scripture, which
shows no sympathy for murderers who have violated the Fifth
Commandment.
A Jewish scholar said if we followed the Old Testament,
capital punishment would be mandatory. Jesus tells us in the New: “Do
not be afraid of those who kill the body but cannot kill the soul. Rather, be
afraid of the One who can cast both body and soul into hell” (Matthew 10:28).
God doesn’t care a whit if our earthly life is prolonged:
His sole concern is the salvation of souls. We all want salvation for the
condemned. Nothing concentrates the mind like the thought of imminent death. If
that doesn’t bring repentance, nothing will.
Paul Beery
Minneapolis, Minnesota
Editor’s note: The Church doesn’t teach that the death penalty
is always wrong, but it does teach that in the modern world, the cases where it
may justly be used “are very rare, if not practically non-existent.” You can
find that in the Catechism of the Catholic Church (No. 2267) and the even newer
Compendium of the Catholic Church (No. 469).
Why Not Paul?
Why are you folks not paying more attention to Ron Paul?
Not only is he the only truly devout Christian candidate
within this race, but he’s also been a pro-lifer throughout his entire Senate
career, has always opposed unjust wars engaged in by the U.S. (e.g. the Iraqi
War), and his economic ideas are much closer to the distributist ways of
thinking developed by G.K. Chesterton among others.
What does it take? Romney’s a Mormon, of all things,
Giuliani is a fallen Catholic, and John McCain flip-flops all over the place.
Ron Paul gets two quick mentions in the article, and Romney
gets practically the whole page.
Please stop giving attention to the worst candidates of the
Republican Party and start giving some press to the only genuine and
practically Catholic candidate: Ron Paul.
Brian Zuelke
Cheyenne, Wyoming
Lack of Attention
I just finished reading the Jan. 27 Register and was
delighted to read the front-page article titled “Ron Paul Draws Passionate
Support.”
I believe that your correspondent, Charlie Spiering, did a
fair and good job briefly covering Paul’s phenomenal run for the Republican
Party’s nomination for president. Reading it, G.K. Chesterton comes to mind, as
Paul’s positions seem to reflect so much “common sense.”
In particular, I was impressed with the statements of Thomas
Woods Jr., saying he supports Paul because of his steadfast, long-held
political views that ring true with the Constitution.
Also, “The fact that Ron Paul is a man of integrity, who
can’t be bought, and preaches his views thick or thin, good times or bad, fair
or foul weather, appeals to Catholics who believe that there are unchanging
truths. It’s very rare to see politicians who stand by their guns in all
circumstances, and this guy does it.”
However, I have to wonder what might have been (regarding
past caucuses and primaries) if your readers had the benefit of this article
prior to casting their respective ballots?
Perhaps, to make up for the lack of timely coverage of Paul
in the past, the Register will see fit to provide further coverage, especially
since the secular Fourth Estate gives little, if any, attention to him.
K. Dale Anderson
Randallstown, Maryland
Wrong Impression
The headline “Rebound? Birth Rate Up, Abortion Down” (Feb.
3) gives the erroneous impression that the overall abortion rate is down.
The truth is that while surgical abortions are
decreasing, the number of procedures lumped under the heading of “early
medication abortions” is rising dramatically.
For example, the French abortion pill RU-486, which has
been on the market for only a few years, has become an increasingly common
option, making abortion less clinical and more private, according to its
users.
Women take the pill in their doctor’s office and then go
home, where they take another drug to trigger contractions, essentially causing
a miscarriage.
According to the pill distributor, 840,000 women have used
the pill since it was approved. One must assume that many RU-486
users would call the loss of their baby a miscarriage, rather than an
abortion.
Another new pharmaceutical killer is the “Plan B”
pill, which is a super-strength birth-control medication.
Taken soon after intercourse, it will prevent pregnancy
or cause an early abortion should conception already have taken
place.
This drug is available over the counter in
pharmacies, and so there is no way of knowing how many abortions may have
resulted from its use.
Although we should take satisfaction from the reduction in
surgical abortions, we also should be alert to the possibility that the overall
abortion rate may be going up, rather than declining, because of a rising
number of unreported medication abortions.
Charles O. Coudert
Sherborn, Massachusetts
Correction
In our Prolife Profile of the St. Gerard Walkathon in
Massachusetts (“Baby Steppers, Feb. 3”), we misspelled a key name and fumbled
an important e-mail address. The founder of the event is Kathleen Laplante (we
erroneously capitalized the “p”), and its e-mail address is
(we had a period where the underscore belongs). We
regret the errors.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Make a Donation now!
Insightful. Informative. Uncompromisingly faithful. The National Catholic Register is more than a newspaper. It’s a cause. Your support for the Register funds important journalism that helps to build a Culture of Life in our nation, and throughout the world. Help us promote the Church’s New Evangelization by donating to the National Catholic Register right now.