|
Letters to the Editors 06.10.2007
June 10-16, 2007 Issue |
Posted 6/5/07 at 7:00 AM
Redefine ‘Just War’
Regarding
the letter “A Stab in the Back” (May 27) and your response:
In
matters of faith and morals, I certainly and wholeheartedly accept “the wisdom
of the Church.”
In
matters of foreign policy, I make my own decisions based on the evidence
available to me.
A)
Virtually every intelligence agency in the world and all of our political
leaders, including all the leaders of the Democratic party at the time, were
convinced that Saddam Hussein was in the process of developing weapons of mass
destruction, and that it was essential that his regime be removed.
B)
While no weapons of mass destruction have been found — yet — the fact, shown
often on television newscasts and reported in newspapers, that our forces
unearthed mass graves containing the bodies of some 300,000 Iraqis, men, women
and children, murdered by Saddam seems quite enough to me to justify a war
against him. Add to that some other well-known and well-publicized facts: that
his two sons made a practice of pulling young ladies out of their college
classes and off the street to rape, torture and kill them; and that he used
chemical weapons to murder many thousands of Kurds.
I
am not impressed with “the wisdom of the Church” on this matter. I think the
Vatican and the bishops ought to redefine the notion of what constitutes a just
war.
We’re
in a sticky muddle in Iraq. A lot of Islamofacists are bent on killing everyone
who doesn’t agree with them, and we ought to be supporting those who are trying
to deal with the situation instead of condemning the effort.
John G. Hubbell
Minnetonka, Minnesota
Editor’s note: It is true that Catholics are free to disagree with the Church on the
question of the justice of a particular war. But Catholics should approach any
war with great regret. Says the Catechism (No. 2307-8): “Because of the evils
and injustices that accompany all war, the Church insistently urges everyone to
prayer and to action so that the divine Goodness may free us from the ancient
bondage of war. All citizens and all governments are obliged to work for the
avoidance of war.”
Devil’s Bargain
Regarding
“Everyone Has the Right to Health Care” (May 27):
Father Andrew McNair, LC, should be
careful with his “rights” talk when discussing health care and the
justification for socialized medicine. It is a tragedy when a child dies from a
preventable disease or an accident. But the nature of a society based on
liberty means that people have the opportunity to make bad choices.
The
parents did not have dental insurance, which is unfortunate, but neither does
my family. Father McNair mentions that the procedure to save the life of
Deamonte would have cost $100. I’m sure that the parents, had they known that
this infection would lead to his death, would have found a way to make that
payment or raise the money.
The
Church can not advocate for socialized medicine without accepting the devil’s
bargain of supporting and subsidizing the immoral and so-called health care
practices currently made legal by our government: abortion, contraception,
sterilization, artificial reproductive techniques, assisted suicide … and the
list goes on. Nor can it realistically expect its Catholic health care
professionals and institutions to be exempt from performing these procedures in
conscience — notice the Church’s developing experience in Europe and even in
the United States with our eroding “free-market” system and emergency
contraception, for example.
Socialized
medicine is a bad idea on many levels. Perhaps what the Church can do is follow
the principle of subsidiarity and form local foundations to subsidize Catholic
dentists to work with low income patients.
Rian Girard
Portland, Oregon
No Fleeting Fad
Regarding
the Editorial “Catholic America” (May 20):
Capitalism
is a fleeting fad? Your editor combines Marxism, other ideologies and
capitalism in a grab bag of isms to be decried. In fact, capitalism is as old
as the first two cave men cooperating together to hollow out a shelter as
quickly and cheaply as possible. Free markets of capitalism have done, and are
doing, more than all the other economic isms together to feed the poor, heal
the sick, and tend the sheep.
Bruce Rusk
Kitty Hawk, North Carolina
Editor’s note: We were citing Pope Benedict XVI’s remarks to Latin American bishops,
where he spoke of the tendencies of both ideologies to reduce the human being
to his economic dimension. Said the Holy Father:
“What
is real? Are only material goods, social, economic and political problems
‘reality’? This was precisely the great error of the dominant tendencies of the
last century, a most destructive error, as we can see from the results of both
Marxist and capitalist systems. They falsify the notion of reality by detaching
it from the foundational and decisive reality which is God. Anyone who excludes
God from his horizons falsifies the notion of ‘reality’ and, in consequence,
can only end up in blind alleys or with recipes for destruction. …
“Both
capitalism and Marxism promised to point out the path for the creation of just
structures, and they declared that these, once established, would function by
themselves; they declared that not only would they have no need of any prior
individual morality, but that they would promote a communal morality. And this
ideological promise has been proved false. The facts have clearly demonstrated
it. The Marxist system, where it found its way into government, left not only a
sad heritage of economic and ecological destruction, but also a painful
oppression of souls. And we can also see the same thing happening in the West,
where the distance between rich and poor is growing constantly, and giving rise
to a worrying degradation of personal dignity through drugs, alcohol and
deceptive illusions of happiness.”
Economic Stabilizer
Relevant
to “Vatican as Peacemaker” (May 6):
Pope
Benedict’s visit to South America highlighted the call for all Catholics to
work in the continuing struggle against poverty in the developing world.
Insurance is an overlooked but vitally important part of that fight. Even small
microinsurance policies can be critical in helping lower-income families after
the loss of a breadwinner. Donors in the United States can help subsidize
policyholders by donating to microinsurers that operate for the benefit of
lower-income policyholders. A simple Internet search on microinsurance can turn
up numerous such insurers in Asia, Africa and Central/South America. My own
company has an arrangement with a Peruvian insurer in which we receive
delinquent policyholder invoices marked as paid because of our donations. This
type of giving is an underutilized but critical part of stabilizing the
economic safety net under those trying to escape poverty.
K.F. Miller
C3KB Solutions, Inc.
Coral Springs, Florida
Rosary’s Evolution
I
would like to comment on Paul Traverzo’s letter, “Liberal Leanings?” (March
18), regarding the omission of the Creed at the beginning of the Rosary. In
many Catholic countries in Europe, the Creed and pendant beads are omitted in
the recitation of the Rosary. In those countries, France and Croatia, for
example, the Rosary begins with the first mystery. The reason is that in the
formation of the Rosary, the Creed and pendant beads were a later addition,
just as the Glory Be was added at the time when devotion to the Holy Name
became prevalent. The Rosary to begin with was not a Marian devotion, but
rather a devotion to the Father by the recitation of the Our Father using 150
beads, stones, berries, etc., which were often placed in a cup or dish and later
separated into decades by those monks who could not read or write.
In the Marian Age, the Rosary became
a devotion to the Blessed Mother with the substitution of the Hail Mary in
place of the Our Father.
Thus,
the entire Rosary evolved in its formation. I, too, was pleasantly surprised
during my many pilgrimages to Catholic countries in Europe to discover the
recitation of the Rosary without the Creed and pendant beads. During the
nightly processions at Lourdes, the Rosary always begins with the first mystery.
Although I was surprised and a bit
confused in fingering my beads, I simply adjusted. The Blessed Mother, I am
sure, is pleased with any prayer offered to her in faith and devotion.
Msgr.
Matthew G. Malnar
Independence, Wisconsin
God Help Us
Relevant
to “Crying Out to God” (April 29):
Several
weeks ago Gov. Timothy Kaine of Virginia spoke at Virginia Tech regarding the
massacre that occurred in their school. In his remarks, the governor used the
one word forbidden to be spoken or written in the U.S. schools.
The
governor quoted the words uttered by Jesus Christ as he hung on the cross, “My
God, my God, why have you forsaken me?” Where was God when this horrible crime
was being committed? Don’t you remember, governor, God was banned from our
schools by Congress?
It’s
okay to say or write anything bashing Christianity, expressing vulgar, immoral
suggestions and engaging in despicable sexual acts in the name of freedom of
expression, but lawsuits, expulsions and/or other severe penalties are incurred
if one refers to God in our schools.
God
help us.
Elizabeth Greek
Reynoldsburg, Ohio
Filed under
Advertisement
Advertisement
Make a Donation now!
Insightful. Informative. Uncompromisingly faithful. The National Catholic Register is more than a newspaper. It’s a cause. Your support for the Register funds important journalism that helps to build a Culture of Life in our nation, and throughout the world. Help us promote the Church’s New Evangelization by donating to the National Catholic Register right now.
Click here to donate
|