|
Faith & Feminism, Part 2: Liberation and Empowerment
I recall standing in the midst of a “Take Back the Night” rally shouting that infamous feminist chant: “Not the church, not the state, women must control our fate.”
BY Melinda Selmys
April 22-28, 2007 Issue |
Posted 4/17/07 at 7:00 AM
I recall
standing in the midst of a “Take Back the Night” rally shouting that infamous
feminist chant: “Not the church, not the state, women must control our fate.”
Chants like this are compelling to
feminists because they point towards one of the most fundamental concerns of
the movement: empowerment.
This term, like so much feminist
diction, is only defined in the vaguest possible way. “Empowerment” can mean
anything from realizing your ability to speak up in public, to finding ways of
pumping your body full of damaging chemicals that prevent impregnation.
Since it is vague, and since it is
often used as a buzzword to justify atrocities like abortion, we tend to have a
strong aversion to using it. We need to understand, though, that it is vague
because it is being misused: It is a positive word being mangled so that it can
encompass negative ideas and behaviors.
In the case of empowerment, this is
a matter of examining the Gospel in order to find the ways in which it empowers
people, and women in particular, and then demonstrating these forms of
empowerment to feminists. This does not mean reinterpreting Scripture and
revising tradition to turn it into a feminist manifesto, but discovering what
real, good feminists are seeking when they speak of empowerment and liberation.
We need to point out that any notion
of empowerment arising primarily from external conditions is ultimately
demeaning because it implies that we are victims of circumstances, unable to be
in control of our own lives. The feminist movement makes a fundamental mistake
when it blames all of women’s problems on men — especially in the form of
church and state.
If all of our problems are the fault
of men and the responsibility of men, then women are essentially and
irreparably dependent and will always be at the mercy of male sentiment.
The empowerment that the Church
offers is an empowerment that the world cannot give. It is based on personal
moral responsibility and self-discipline — and thus it has always been able to
produce women like St. Catherine of Alexandria and St. Joan of Arc, who were
powerful, influential and in control of their own lives in spite of the
persecution of hostile or misogynistic leaders.
Naturally, we want to try to
eliminate the misogynistic leaders so that these women can guide and inform
society instead of being martyred, but we need to recognize that the
empowerment that these women possessed did not come from a feminist society,
but rather from an interior self-discipline and a sense of self in relation to
God.
Unless we have the internal
discipline to control ourselves, we are always going to feel helpless,
powerless and out of control. No amount of gender equity or contraception will
change that.
The Church empowers women by
insisting that we are moral agents instead of moral victims, by asserting that
women don’t need abortions to make up for an inability to make responsible
sexual decisions, and by providing a model of interior dignity and self control
that cannot be shattered by circumstances outside of ourselves.
In many cases, feminism promotes a
juvenile notion of freedom — freedom to do whatever you’re inclined to do —
that runs in opposition to Christianity’s more mature idea that liberation
involves freedom from internal compulsions, the freedom to choose the good.
When we are teen-agers the freedom to be able to drink may seem incredibly
appealing.
When we grow up, we realize that the
external freedom to drink can be incredibly destructive if it is not balanced
by an internal freedom to stop drinking before it interferes with our real
goals in life.
The freedom to commit yourself to
another person for life — and to know that you have the self-control to make a
promise of fidelity in good conscience — is a much more fundamental and
valuable kind of freedom than the freedom to give yourself to any random person
for a single night. There are millions of women who are sexually “liberated,”
they have their contraception and their abortions and their open relationships,
and yet they feel that they are out of control.
Ultimately, there are only two ways
for us to deal with the fact that adult choices have real consequences that
affect our lives. Either we can rail against this, trying to “liberate”
ourselves by blaming those consequences on real or imagined social forces, or
we can find true liberation by achieving the internal freedom to make our
present choices conform to our long-term goals.
Next week, we’ll take a look at one
of feminism’s most common mistakes, and at the Church’s response.
Melinda Selmys writes from Etibicoke, Ontario.
Filed under
Advertisement
Advertisement
Make a Donation now!
Insightful. Informative. Uncompromisingly faithful. The National Catholic Register is more than a newspaper. It’s a cause. Your support for the Register funds important journalism that helps to build a Culture of Life in our nation, and throughout the world. Help us promote the Church’s New Evangelization by donating to the National Catholic Register right now.
Click here to donate
| 
.
