An Urgent Message from Fr. Owen Kearns LC, Publisher
What we deliver with our journalism, we cannot deliver without your generosity.
The National Catholic Register needs your help. Revenue from subscriptions and advertising can't keep up with the rising cost of payroll, printing, postage and other expenses. We must rely on donations to make up the difference. To continue our hard-hitting investigative reporting, we need your financial support. Please donate today.
...or click here to learn about donating to specific projects.
Donations to Circle Media are tax-deductible. (Photo credits/CNS)
Family advocates and purveyors of pornography are definitely strange bedfellows.
BY Alan Sears
April 1-7, 2007 Issue |
Posted 3/27/07 at 8:00 AM
Family advocates and purveyors of pornography are
definitely strange bedfellows. But when it comes to the proposed “.xxx”
Internet domain for porn sites, recently resurrected for consideration by the
Internet Corporation for Assigning Names and Numbers (ICANN), both camps are
largely against it, albeit for radically different reasons.
Though
ICANN intends that having pornographers move their sites of exploitation and
voyeurism from “.com” to “.xxx” locations would be strictly voluntary for now,
pornographers fear new laws could be enacted making it mandatory — meaning
parents could more easily protect their children from stumbling onto obscene
and other pornographic online material by setting filters to block all “.xxx”
sites.
Unfortunately,
life’s not that simple. Family advocates know that since pornographers (many of
whom already operate far outside the law) will not be asked to relinquish their
“.com” sites, voluntarily relocating to a “.xxx” site could actually increase,
even double, the number of ways to reach pornography on the Internet — and only
half of it, if that much, will supposedly be easier to block. It’s a lateral
move that achieves nothing substantial or good.
Besides,
even if Congress or various legislatures in the United States and elsewhere
enact laws mandating that all purveyors of Internet-based pornography move from
“.com” to “.xxx” sites, there’s no guarantee they’ll comply.
They’ll
tie it up with fights over definitions in the courts for years. Why bother?
Longstanding federal obscenity and child-pornography laws already prohibit
distributing hardcore pornography and child sexual abuse photos on the
Internet. But thanks to the efforts of groups like the ACLU and the profiteers
from sexual exploitation, much of even the worst of the stuff is wrongly
claimed — even by many charged with law enforcement — to be “protected” free
speech, so long as it doesn’t involve children, blood, defecation or
interspecies (animal) activity.
Creating
a new “.xxx” domain is tantamount to telling all the women trapped in
prostitution in Los Angeles that they can be exploited this way legally so long
as their exploiters contain their activities to a certain section of the Sunset
Strip.
While
some may go voluntarily, most pimps will soon find that the street is too
crowded with competition and move them elsewhere. To sex criminals who trade in
human flesh, laws like these mean nothing.
And
we must be clear about this: Like prostitution and child abuse, Internet porn
is never a victimless crime.
It
is a growing, multi-billion-dollar criminal enterprise that wreaks havoc in the
lives of everyone it touches — from the women and men degraded during its
production to the consumers (and those on whom they act out their learned
behavior) who find their habits exacting high social costs.
Experienced
law enforcement officials will tell you that long before many sadistic rapists
or serial killers embark on a high-profile spree, they almost always start
small — at home with some form of pornography. It is the true “hate literature”
of our age; it desensitizes the soul and distorts the view and purpose of the
expression of love, unity and fulfillment that chaste sexual behavior properly
represents. And selling such graphic, hard-core exploitation of sex — over the
Internet or anywhere else — is a federal offense.
The
fastest, most direct solution to the Internet obscenity problem is to
vigorously enforce the laws we already have.
History
shows us that prosecuting pornographers is both possible and effective. During
the Reagan and first Bush administrations, a democratic Congress updated laws
by overwhelming margins, and a Department of Justice task force cracked down on
the distribution and content of all types of hard-core pornography nationwide.
The results? An unheard-of 90% rate of conviction against major national
distributors that, for a time, made a real difference.
Unfortunately,
this prosecutorial juggernaut screeched to a halt in 1993 when President
Clinton appointed Janet Reno as attorney general. In the few Reno prosecutions,
the ineffective policy became to prosecute only the so-called “worst offenders”
first.
But
those extreme types of pornography comprise only about 2% of what’s sent over
the Internet, and pornographers took that guideline as a green light to operate
without inhibition.
But
a window of opportunity to take back the ground given up over the last 14 years
is opening.
For
one thing, the new “.xxx” domain is not a done deal — the consent of the U.S.
Commerce Department is likely necessary, giving laypeople a chance to make
their voices heard (commerce.gov).
Moreover,
U.S. Attorney General Alberto Gonzales has renewed efforts to crack down on
online obscenity: He established a task force in 2005 to investigate and
prosecute the distribution of obscene materials, concentrating on Internet
pornography.
According
to a study conducted by the Florida Family Association, only 20 American
companies operate more than 70% of the 297 million porn sites on the World Wide
Web. Clearly, a concentrated effort by the Department of Justice could wipe out
nearly three-quarters of illicit Internet pornography in the next few years.
The
federal government already has all it needs to curb the sale of Internet smut.
All it requires is the courage and conviction to follow through.
Alan Sears, a former
federal prosecutor,
was executive director of the Attorney General’s
Commission on Pornography under President Ronald Reagan.
Insightful. Informative. Uncompromisingly faithful. The National Catholic Register is more than a newspaper. It’s a cause. Your support for the Register funds important journalism that helps to build a Culture of Life in our nation, and throughout the world. Help us promote the Church’s New Evangelization by donating to the National Catholic Register right now.