An Urgent Message from Fr. Owen Kearns LC, Publisher
What we deliver with our journalism, we cannot deliver without your generosity.
The National Catholic Register needs your help. Revenue from subscriptions and advertising can't keep up with the rising cost of payroll, printing, postage and other expenses. We must rely on donations to make up the difference. To continue our hard-hitting investigative reporting, we need your financial support. Please donate today.
...or click here to learn about donating to specific projects.
Donations to Circle Media are tax-deductible. (Photo credits/CNS)
The American Psychological Association has issued a report about the dangers of sexualizing girls.
BY BETHANY NOBLE
REGISTER CORRESPONDENT
April 1-7, 2007 Issue |
Posted 3/27/07 at 8:00 AM
WASHINGTON — Products such as Bratz
dolls clad in leather mini-skirts abound on the market for girls under age 10.
Teen magazines and television shows promote underdressed celebrities such as
Paris Hilton and Brittney Spears as role models. A porn actress writes a
best-selling autobiography, and pre-teen girls show up at her book signings.
Parents have long expressed concern
that their daughters are being “sexualized” by merchandise and mass media.
Sex sells, and it is increasingly
being used to market clothing, toys and entertainment to young girls.
But is society selling these girls
short? What are the long-term implications of teaching a child that she must
look and behave like a sexual object to be fashionable or popular?
The American Psychological
Association addressed the issue in a recent study. It formed a task force to
define sexualization, examine its prevalence and provide examples in society
and in cultural institutions. The task force also set out to evaluate the
evidence suggesting that sexualization has negative consequences for girls and
for society. It described positive alternatives to help counteract it.
The report, published Feb. 19,
defined sexualization as something “occurring when a person’s value comes only
from his or her sexual appeal or behavior, to the exclusion of other
characteristics, and when a person is sexually objectified.” Results showed
that every media form contributed to the sexualization of girls and young women
by portraying them in a sexual manner more often than boys and men.
Task force member Sharon Lamb,
co-author of Packaging Girlhood: Rescuing Our
Daughters From Marketers’ Schemes, said marketers play a significant
role in sexualizing girls. “They are reaching down to younger and younger
girls, selling a version of what it means to be a teenager,” she said.
“According to them it is all about being hot and sexy.”
The task force also found that
parents, teachers and peers may also contribute to the sexualization by
conveying the message that physical appearance is the most important goal for a
girl. The study went on to suggest that girls may also play a part in
sexualizing themselves by wearing clothing to make them look “sexy,” thus
viewing themselves as sexual objects.
Damaging
The American Psychological
Association’s report concluded that sexualization was damaging to all women,
but particularly to younger girls who are still forming a sense of self.
Negative effects include increased risks of depression, eating disorders and
low self-esteem. It also discussed the negative impact the sexualization of
girls can have on society as a whole as it affects other groups, including men
and boys.
Catholic psychiatrist Richard
Fitzgibbons sees narcissism in our culture with the worship of the body. He
points to media outlets such as MySpace and YouTube.
“These Internet programs contribute
to a person believing their identity is determined by their body,” he said. “A
girl typically puts pictures of herself online to get attention and comments
from others. Some girls get so caught up in the Internet culture, their own
self-worth is measured by how their Internet ‘friends’ view their physical
appearance.”
Citing John Paul II’s 1994 Letter to
Families, Fitzgibbons explained that permissive parenting can cause a girl to
succumb to sexualization. “Girls are at risk when parents fail to correct
selfishness, form modesty and monitor friendships,” he said.
The task force recommends educating
parents on the dangers of sexualizing girls and urges them to become more
involved in viewing media with their children. The task force also encouraged
organized groups to step up and confront the issue by offering girls “practical
and psychological alternatives to the values conveyed by popular culture.”
“If marketers and the media assume
more of a social conscience, this sexualization of girls can be prevented,”
said Lamb. “Parent protests and support of watchdog groups are also important.”
Joseph D’Agostino of the Population
Research Institute, a non-profit research and educational organization, asserts
that the American Psychological Association’s report stops short by failing to
mention the sexualization of girls as a result of the feminist movement. In a
weekly briefing, he wrote, “The politically correct view is that the
sexualization of girls and feminism are opposing forces, but in fact they have
gone hand-in-hand.”
D’Agostino attested that feminism
teaches girls that chastity oppresses them and a girl must liberate herself
sexually to be equal with men.
“They have taught that there are no
natural limits to sexuality,” he wrote. “Based on feminist principles, why
shouldn’t little girls sexualize themselves? And why shouldn’t adult men and
women view them as sexual if there is no such thing as unnatural sexuality?”
Fitzgibbons said parents must “grow
in wisdom as authoritative parents.” He also encouraged priests and Catholic
educators to “communicate the truth about sexual morality and warn of the
dangers of the sexual utilitarian philosophy and the contraceptive mentality.”
Reaching Out
Fitzgibbons recommends reading John
Paul II’s 1994 Letter to Families and his 1981 Apostolic Exhortation, Familiaris
Consortio (The Role of the Christian Family in the Modern World), as
well as teaching children the truth about human sexuality.
“An excellent resource is Theology
of the Body for Teens by Jason Evert,
Brian Butler, Mark Hart and Crystalina Evert from Ascension Press,” he
said.
Catholic groups have recognized this
crisis and are reaching out to young women. Pure Fashion, an organization that
helps women ages 14-18 “embrace their authentic beauty and innate dignity as
children of God, focuses on guiding young women to live the virtues of modesty
and purity in their schools and communities.”
According to Rhonda Boyle, Pure
Fashion’s national assistant, the program is designed to combat the
sexualization of girls through fashion.
“We are working hard,” she said, “to
change our culture by creating role models who will live a life of purity and
modesty in fashion in their schools, churches and communities.”
Bethany Noble is based in
Phoenix, Arizona.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Make a Donation now!
Insightful. Informative. Uncompromisingly faithful. The National Catholic Register is more than a newspaper. It’s a cause. Your support for the Register funds important journalism that helps to build a Culture of Life in our nation, and throughout the world. Help us promote the Church’s New Evangelization by donating to the National Catholic Register right now.