|
To Tax Churches Is to Muzzle Religion
BY Gerald J. Russello
September 6-12, 2009 Issue |
Posted 8/28/09 at 1:22 PM
While it is
tempting to focus on the raging health-care debate or the Supreme Court now
that Judge Sonia Sotomayor has been added to the bench, those concerned about
religious liberty need to pay as much attention to what happens in the depths
of the administrative state as to the decisions emanating from Washington.
The apologetics group Catholic
Answers knows that danger all too well.
In 2004, the Internal Revenue
Service investigated Catholic Answers for allegedly improperly interfering in
the 2004 presidential campaign. The supposed violations revolved around two
e-letters posted on the Catholic Answers website, Catholic.com. The letters
deal not with politics or whom Catholics (or anyone else) should vote for, but
rather with the propriety of letting Catholic politicians who are known not to
support Church teaching, in this case abortion, receive Communion.
The IRS found these letters to be
“political expenditures,” which meant that the publication of the letters
possibly violated Catholic Answers’ status as a tax-exempt religious
organization. After a lengthy audit of Catholic Answers, the IRS essentially
forced the president of Catholic Answers, Karl Keating, to pay for the letters
personally.
Catholic Answers sued the IRS for a
refund in federal court in California. In essence, Catholic Answers is arguing
for a decision holding that the rules the IRS uses to find supposedly violative
“political” conduct by religious groups is too vague to be of any use and
subject to abuse. The IRS has agreed to allow Catholic Answers to refund
Keating, but has not moved from its position that the letters were improper
interference in a political campaign.
An IRS finding that a church or
other religious organization has violated the prohibition on political activity
can be devastating. Not only would the entity have to pay taxes, but their
contributors’ support of those institutions may no longer be considered
deductible. And not many religious entities have the resources to combat IRS
audits, and so may feel compelled not to resist.
To maintain their tax-exempt status,
IRS regulations provide that churches “must not provide a substantial benefit
to private interests, they must not devote a substantial part of their
activities to attempting to influence legislation, they must not participate
in, or intervene in, any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to)
any candidate for public office.” Needless to say, these provisions are
somewhat vague and are possibly subject to manipulation or abuse. Indeed, as
the Catholic Answers case shows, the plain discussion of doctrine that may have
public implications can too easily be transformed into prohibited intervention
in a political campaign.
This danger is of especial concern
to Catholics. The Church is a private institution, of course, but one with a
concrete, public existence, one that of course long predates the IRS and even
the nation. It has a long tradition of calling leaders to repent and live in
the fullness of the faith they profess, no matter the particular political
system. While no American bishop has called a politician to repent as Henry IV
at Canossa did a thousand years ago, nevertheless the Church has never denied
the ability to do so. The public acts and personal faith of Catholics cannot be
as easily separated as the IRS may think.
We should also be mindful of the
proper basis for protecting churches against taxation from the state, which in
the United States, at least, is a protection of long standing. Since the 18th
century, churches in the United States have been exempt from taxation and have
enjoyed other favorable tax benefits. But the understanding of the bases for
these protections has shifted. Churches do not exist by sufferance of the
state, and not taxing churches is good policy not because the state may believe
it is a good idea.
Rather, like our right to worship
freely, the existence of churches and their ability to freely practice their
faith — including calling politicians to live that faith — exist apart from,
and prior to, state power. If taxation is one way for the state to limit and
restrict churches to fulfill their mission, and so is limited, the threat of
removing tax-exempt status can be used to the same effect. In any event, why
can’t churches promote political positions? Involvement of religious
organizations with public causes — such as those against slavery or in support
of the temperance movement — are a firm part of American history. The evolution
of the IRS rules has become another example of a secular culture hostile to the
religious traditions of the nation.
The targeting of churches that
engage in unpopular advocacy is very real. An April 2009 Department of Homeland
Security report on “extremism” explicitly identified “anti-abortion” groups as
one possible type of right-wing extremist group. While the report makes no
mention of the Church or Catholics, nevertheless there is a common theme
evident. If pro-life agitation can be a sign of an extremist group, then
discussion of the proper ecclesial response to politicians who advocate the
contrary position can perhaps be too easily seen as improper “interference” in
political campaigns — like the protests against the contributions the Mormon
church made in support of California’s Proposition 8. There, too, arguments
were made to eliminate the Mormons’ tax-exempt status as punishment for
engaging in public debate.
Religious freedom remains a robust
part of the American heritage of constitutional liberty, and the chances of
churches losing their tax-exempt status remain, thankfully, small.
Nevertheless, as the Catholic Answers case demonstrates, that heritage cannot
be taken for granted.
Gerald J. Russello is a fellow of the
Chesterton Institute at Seton Hall University.
Filed under
Advertisement
Advertisement
Make a Donation now!
Insightful. Informative. Uncompromisingly faithful. The National Catholic Register is more than a newspaper. It’s a cause. Your support for the Register funds important journalism that helps to build a Culture of Life in our nation, and throughout the world. Help us promote the Church’s New Evangelization by donating to the National Catholic Register right now.
Click here to donate
|