|
Facing the New Fascism
BY Jennifer Morse Roback, Ph.D.
May 31-June 6, 2009 Issue |
Posted 5/22/09 at 7:01 AM
The premise of Jonah Goldberg's book Liberal Fascism is
that the socialist or liberal left frequently uses the tactics of the fascist
right. Some liberals are so convinced of the correctness of their cause that
they think themselves entitled to the use of any methods, no matter how
illiberal, to advance that cause. In the aftermath of the California voters'
passage of Proposition 8, the new fascist mindset is on display in living
Technicolor, or maybe I should say in rainbow color.
California voters rejected the darling social
cause of the fashionable elites: same-sex "marriage." The election procedures
were undeniably fair: After all, this is the electorate that voted for Obama by
landslide margins. Did I say that? Obama won by 52% of the popular vote
nationwide: the exact same percentage that voted for Proposition 8. So the
homosexual lobby must find some other pretext for undoing the outcome of a fair
election. Please observe the tactics:
1. Get the judiciary to overturn the
election on a technicality: Proposition 8 was not an amendment at all, but a
"revision" to the California Constitution.
If they really believe this
argument, they should have asked to throw it out before it ever got on the
ballot. Both sides were in court, back in July, when Jerry Brown was rewriting
the title of the initiative in order to sink its chances of passing. That would
have been a good time to bring up the subject of "revision vs. amendment" —
before the two sides spent more than $70 million on an election.
2. Delegitimize the vote itself.
Keep repeating the lie that all the pro-Prop. 8 arguments were lies. Make
people ashamed of having voted for Prop. 8. Keep fighting the same election
over and over until people give up and let you win out of sheer exhaustion.
The "No" team had an entire election
cycle, with lots of money, to try to convince people to reject our arguments.
They don't seem to accept the fact that they don't get forever to try to make
their case.
3. Intimidate people. If all else
fails, scare people. March in the streets in large numbers. Pick out
defenseless targets. Don't protest in working-class neighborhoods, even though
working-class people voted strongly for Prop. 8. Demonstrate against Mormons
instead. Target Prop. 8 donors, even people who gave as little as $100. Hound
them out of their jobs. And while you're at it, attack some little old ladies
carrying crosses (Google Palm Springs Prop. 8 Rally Turns
Ugly to find the YouTube clip). Grab their crosses and throw them on
the ground and stomp on them.
These are not liberal tactics. These
are strong-armed, bullying tactics, better suited to certain European countries
in the 1930s and '40s than to America in the 21st century.
4. Demonize your opponents. Blame
all your troubles on an unpopular or mysterious religious minority. If only the
Mormons hadn't spent so much time and money for Prop. 8, it would not have
passed. Therefore, the whole election is suspect.
And while you're in the scapegoating
business, go ahead and blame the racial minorities who voted for Prop. 8 in
overwhelming numbers. Homosexual bloggers have reported the "liberal" use of
the "n word" at some of the protests: white homosexuals blaming black
homosexuals because "their community" voted against them.
The
homosexual activist lobby doesn't understand that the rest of the world does
not view same-sex "marriage" as the ultimate civil rights issue. Members of the
liberal black community are trying to explain this to the homosexual lobby
(Google No on 8's White Bias to find the L.A. Times
article on the subject), but I doubt they will get it. They seem to be
committed to the time-honored strategy of political radicals everywhere: assume
the conclusion. Repeat it loud enough and often enough and you may not ever
have to make an actual argument for it.
Now, I am certainly aware that not
all homosexuals and lesbians agree with all the tactics adopted by activist
leaders who claim to represent them. Some homosexuals and lesbians even voted
Yes on Prop. 8. I know these "gay dissenters" exist, because they send me
e-mails.
And I feel sure that most of the
people who voted No on Prop. 8 are not radicals of any kind, certainly not
liberal fascists. Most probably cast their vote for fairness, tolerance and
treating others nicely.
But the homosexual lobby is now
being grossly unfair to the voters of California by trying to replace the
results of a fair election with a combination of mob tactics and raw judicial
power. The homosexual activist lobby is being intolerant of people who disagree
with them, by deliberately inciting hatred against a religious minority. And as
for treating others nicely, well, where I come from, assaulting little old
ladies and hounding people out of their jobs does not count as being nice.
So I ask the more than 6 million
Californians who voted No on Prop. 8: Is this really what you meant to vote
for? And I ask everyone watching the behavior of the California homosexual
activists: Is this a group of people that needs more power?
American voters have consistently
supported marriage between a man and a woman. Voters will not forget the
homosexual lobby's strong-arm tactics in California. In the next round of
deliberations over same-sex "marriage," voters will reject these tactics every
bit as much as same-sex "marriage" itself.
We don't want this type of political
extremism in America.
Jennifer Roback Morse is the founder
and president of the Ruth Institute,
an educational project of the
National Organization for Marriage.
Filed under
Advertisement
Advertisement
Make a Donation now!
Insightful. Informative. Uncompromisingly faithful. The National Catholic Register is more than a newspaper. It’s a cause. Your support for the Register funds important journalism that helps to build a Culture of Life in our nation, and throughout the world. Help us promote the Church’s New Evangelization by donating to the National Catholic Register right now.
Click here to donate
|