January 11-17, 2009 Issue |
Posted 1/5/09 at 7:05 AM
WASHINGTON, D.C. — As President Bush
prepares to leave office after eight years, many pro-life advocates give him
credit for significant life-affirming gains during his presidency. But, they
say, only a portion of that legacy will survive.
Even Bush’s critics can agree that
his judicial appointments will be his most enduring accomplishment. Other gains
— such as new federal regulations protecting the conscience rights of doctors —
could be very short-lived.
A new regulation protecting
health-care providers’ conscience rights was issued Dec. 18 by the Department
of Health and Human Services (see Briefs, page 2).
“The most lasting and significant
progress made under President Bush is represented by the two Supreme Court
justices [John Roberts and Samuel Alito] that he nominated and the Senate
confirmed,” said Father Frank Pavone, national director of Priests for Life.
“That was the motivation for so many
voters who elected the president both times. And it has already paid off, as
the Supreme Court upheld the ban on partial-birth abortion,” he said. “Other
federal courts, too, have been given men and women who for decades will issue
decisions consistent with the moral law, thanks to President Bush.
“Legislatively,” Father Pavone
added, “it’s only in the years ahead that we’ll fully appreciate the
significance of the progress that was made by the pro-life laws the president
signed.”
He cited the Born-Alive Infants
Protection Act as another example.
“This drew a line in the sand
against infanticide,” said Deirdre McQuade, assistant director of policy and
communications for the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops’ Pro-Life
Secretariat.
The 2002 act “placed into the law a
foundation that is essential to eventually making abortion illegal,” Father
Pavone explained. “That foundation is that the law can protect a child in his
or her first nine months of development, despite a parent’s intention to kill
that child. A child who survives a failed abortion is now protected by law.
That’s a crucial step forward.”
Former Pennsylvania Sen. Rick Santorum
agreed that Alito and Roberts “have proven to be exceptional choices” and that
passage of the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban was a highlight of Bush’s tenure.
“After years of vetoes by President Clinton, President Bush showed the courage
to sign the bill that banned this gruesome procedure,” he said.
Although passed in 2003, the law did
not take effect until the Supreme Court upheld it in the 2007 Gonzalez
v. Carhart decision. Both Bush appointees voted to uphold that ban.
“It stood constitutional muster,” said McQuade.
She pointed to the 2004 Unborn
Victims of Violence Act as another milestone. “This acknowledged there are
separate victims if a mother and her unborn child are injured,” she said.
“These three major laws should not be touched by anything President-elect Obama
can do. Nothing’s beyond the scope of possibility, but it’s highly unlikely.”
Stem-Cell Debate
However, she said, other Bush
policies will likely soon vanish because they depend on White House approval.
These policies include a prohibition
on funding coerced abortion oversees, a limit on federally funding embryonic
stem-cell research, and allowing states to provide coverage for prenatal care
in the State Children’s Health Insurance Program.
Also facing extinction is the Mexico
City Policy, which prohibits U.S. funding to groups that perform or promote
abortion as family planning abroad. Clinton scrapped it, and Bush reinstated
it.
And just two days before Obama takes
office, stronger federal guidelines will take effect to protect the rights of
doctors and other health-care workers from having to assist in abortions and
other medical procedures based on moral objections. McQuade said the bishops
welcome this conscience protection, which Planned Parenthood is already working
to eliminate.
Santorum also praised Bush’s 2001
decision to withhold federal funds forhuman cloning and to
limit funding for embryonic stem-cell research.
On that point, American Life League
President Judie Brown profoundly disagrees. “George Bush left a legacy of confusion
and proved to be a lackluster ‘pro-life’ politician,” she said. “He started off
playing Pontius Pilate with human embryonic children, and things never got
better.”
Bush kept in place part of the
National Institutes of Health guidelines for embryonic stem-cell research.
These guidelines prohibit federal money from being used to kill human embryos
or for research using embryos specially created for research.
However, the guidelines would have
allowed federal funds for research on stem cells obtained by the privately
funded killing of “excess” embryos from fertility clinics, but Bush limited
federal funding only to those 60 cell lines already in existence.
At the United Nations
This “compromise” was hailed by some
for discouraging future killing of human embryos but criticized by many,
including the American bishops, as still unethical. The president’s decision
allowed research “to continue to cultivate a disrespect for human life,” Brown
said.
“The fundamental question with stem
cells is: Do you destroy life to save life?” the president said during a Dec.
18 forum of the American Enterprise Institute. “I came down on the side that
there are other opportunities available to save lives other than the
destruction of life. And secondly, I was concerned about using taxpayers’ money
that would end up destroying life.”
Bush said that since the Aug. 9,
2001, decision, adult skin cells have been used to develop the equivalent of
embryonic stem cells.
“Bush certainly had a positive
impact, especially with his Supreme Court appointments,” said Bill Cotter, head
of Boston’s Operation Rescue, “but he really wasn’t a leader for the pro-life
cause.”
Cotter, a Catholic, has led
semi-weekly prayer vigils outside Boston-area abortion clinics since before
Bush took office. “He didn’t adhere to a Catholic understanding of the issue in
regard to so-called family planning and contraceptive funding,” Cotter said,
“but there’s a night-and-day difference between Bush and Obama.”
As president of the Catholic Family
and Human Rights Institute (C-FAM), Austin Ruse observed the Bush
administration’s struggle in the United Nations. C-FAM’s mission is to defend
life and family at international institutions.
“Bush’s lasting legacy will be
Alito, Roberts and the judicial appointments that last,” Ruse said. “Honestly,
there will be no lasting legacy [at the United Nations], because the Bush
administration was profoundly outnumbered. But he did a great thing for eight
years in that he stopped big global conferences from happening.”
Ruse said the presence of the Bush
administration at the United Nations prevented two global conferences marking
the 10th anniversary of the 1994 Cairo conference on population and development
and the 1995 Beijing conference on women, both of which had serious
population-control issues.
“Bush and his negotiators —
particularly Ellen Sauerbrey — were among the bravest in the world,” he said.
Sauerbrey was the U.S. representative to the United Nations Commission of the
Status of Women, where she focused on improving women’s economic and
educational status and the protection of life.
”At times, she stood up completely
alone; she was hooted at, hissed at, and booed,” Ruse said. “Their victories
are short-lived and will not last, but they were heroic while they did it.”
Gail Besse writes
from Boston.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Make a Donation now!
Insightful. Informative. Uncompromisingly faithful. The National Catholic Register is more than a newspaper. It’s a cause. Your support for the Register funds important journalism that helps to build a Culture of Life in our nation, and throughout the world. Help us promote the Church’s New Evangelization by donating to the National Catholic Register right now.
.
