An Urgent Message from Fr. Owen Kearns LC, Publisher
What we deliver with our journalism, we cannot deliver without your generosity.
The National Catholic Register needs your help. Revenue from subscriptions and advertising can't keep up with the rising cost of payroll, printing, postage and other expenses. We must rely on donations to make up the difference. To continue our hard-hitting investigative reporting, we need your financial support. Please donate today.
...or click here to learn about donating to specific projects.
Donations to Circle Media are tax-deductible. (Photo credits/CNS)
October 26-November 1, 2008 Issue |
Posted 10/21/08 at 9:04 AM
Better Catholic Heroes
Relevant to the letter to the editor
“Catholic Hero? Not to Me” (Oct. 5): I completely agree with the author of
the letter! There are much better Catholic heroes than Hellboy.
More importantly, I am not a big fan
of the comic book and video game reviews. As far as video games are
concerned, they are very expensive. A video game system, together with a
few games, can easily cost $500. By contrast, I received a letter in the
mail a while ago regarding a charity, which stated that $10 can buy clothing
for 10 needy children in the third world. So can we as Catholics justify
spending $500 to amuse ourselves, when that money could clothe 500 poor children?
Wouldn’t it be wonderful if Catholic
parents would tell their children, “Kids, instead of buying $500 worth of video
game merchandise, we’re going to give it to charity so that 500 poor children
can have clean, new clothing”? And then they can spend the time they would
have spent on video games playing board games, volunteering, doing pro-life
work, saying a family Rosary, taking the dog for a walk, playing outside, or
any number of other family activities.
This reminds me of the saying “Live
simply so that others may simply live.” We should take seriously Jesus’ warning
in the parable of the rich man and Lazarus. We are the rich man. We
need to learn from his mistakes and be generous, so as to avoid his fate.
Jaimie
Iuranich
Buffalo,
New York
Apples and Oranges
Homosexuals should be insulted by
the recent court rulings allowing so-called same-sex “marriage” (“Connecticut
Marriage Fight,” Oct. 19). Clearly and simply, men and women are designed
with a complementarity which serves a purpose: the procreation of
children. Marriage serves to protect the offspring of this union.
To “dumb down” the definition of
marriage so that an adult can pretend to have that which is impossible for him
or her to have — thanks to nature’s design — is to rob that person of his or
her God-given human dignity. Our homosexual brothers and sisters deserve
better than that.
You can call an apple an orange, but
it is still an apple.
Mary
K. Mulligan
Phoenix,
Arizona
Special-Needs Spotlight
Your recent addition of Leticia
Velasquez to your contributing journalists is an excellent choice. Her articles
like “Down, Hero Dad and Palin” from the Oct. 12 issue are beautifully written,
personal and informative. The topic of Down syndrome is one she covers
particularly well. It is high time this important issue came to the forefront.
Elizabeth
Kathryn Gerold-Miller
Ridge,
New York
Political Views vs. Lives
Like Brother Terrence Lauerman
(“True Family Values,” Sept. 28), I think it is a moral tragedy that divorce
among Christians and Catholics is so common and that our Christian leaders have
done relatively little to reverse the acceptance of divorce and eliminate it
for those who enter the sacrament of holy matrimony. I also think it is sad
that the good work that Catholics and other Christians do to help people
overcome same-sex attraction is so little known and savagely disparaged by
homosexual advocates.
But, a moral myopia seems to affect
Brother Terrence. First, not only have
we had U.S. presidents and presidential candidates who have been divorced, but
we have had U.S. presidents who had never been divorced, but who repeatedly
committed adultery: John Kennedy and Bill Clinton come to mind. Second, how can
we hold divorced presidents or presidential candidates to a standard of no
divorce when the churches they were married in do not see divorce as
immoral? Finally, there are other evils
elected officials can commit that are just as — or more — immoral than
adultery, such as abortion, homosexual “marriage,” fornication, cohabitation,
and contraception.
Since Brother Terrence is concerned
about adultery through divorce, he should be relieved to know that Republicans
have generally punished their adulterers: Rep. Robert Livingston resigned as
Speaker of the House, and Rep. Newt Gingrich resigned as well, when their
adultery became public. But Democrats Barney Frank, who lives with a homosexual
partner who ran a homosexual escort service from Frank’s home, continues to
serve in Congress, as does Sen. Ted Kennedy. And, I wonder if Brother Terrence
would have voted at all had the choice been between McCain and revealed
adulterer John Edwards, had the latter gotten the party nomination.
A candidate’s marital history is
indeed important to me, but his support for a host of other issues, including
his comfort level with racists and former terrorists and support for
legislation that forces widespread social acceptance of homosexuality, divorce,
contraception, fornication and abortion throughout our social institutions,
concerns me a great deal more.
Laura
Graham
Tehachapi,
California
Voting for Gospel Values
Regarding “Voter Traps” (Oct. 5),
parents have the responsibility to watch over their children who, if they had
total freedom, would seek immediate gratification of all that seemed good —
candy, TV, games — as soon as they could get it. They would also avoid
things that are difficult but important for growth (such as discipline,
homework, housework), procrastinating as long as possible. Of course, then
there would be consequences for such courses of action: stomach aches from too
much candy, poor vision from watching too much television, lower academic
scores from more games and less homework, and cockroaches rampant in the dirty
bedroom, etc. This is among the reasons why God has given parents to children.
The same is true for children of
whatever age. We live in a tumultuous time: uncertainty of gas prices,
restlessness over the economy, particularly in the housing and investment
departments, insecurity over Middle East issues, and an election that is polarizing
a nation between fixing economic issues versus defending life. Children,
lacking patience, will want the quick fix, regardless of the moral
dimension. For spiritual maturity, we Christians must take a stand for
Gospel values — abortion, the sanctity of marriage, the importance of
Judeo-Christian values — alongside leadership that has experience, as opposed
to leadership that lacks an appreciation for Gospel and family values.
The Israelites were exiled into
Babylon when the prophet Isaiah told King Ahaz to be patient, asking him what
sign he wanted. The king was in despair and “would not tempt the Lord,”
but formed an alliance with another nation that was not in accord with God’s
will. As a result, they lost and were exiled for about 50 years. If we Christians
fail to stand up for moral values this election year, we will live the
consequences of our despair, our impatience, our childish need for immediate
self-gratification. Defending life that is not even your own runs parallel
to what Jesus said: “There is no greater love than to lay down one’s life for
another” (John 15:13).
If we truly want to be mature,
we must be patient and place the Gospel values of life above the sugar-coated
speeches of an improved economy, which cannot even be guaranteed.
Father
John Zimmerman
St.
Anne’s Parish
Florence, South Carolina
Misleading Title
“Myth No. 5: Atheist Aid” (Sept. 28)
is an interesting but misleading title for the study. The study did not isolate
and compare a religious group to an atheist group but religious to secular.
Some in the secular group would identify as Christians but didn’t go to church
often enough to be included in the religious group. I did read the original
report, and the word “atheist” never appears in it. Also, in the latest Pew
Research report on religion just a few months ago, only 5% of Americans claim
to be atheists. The study had more than 25% of the study group as secular (or
atheist if you are Catholic).
I would have to agree with the
conclusion that religious people give more than secular people, at least based
on the method the study used.
If you do a comparison with Europe,
much more secular than the U.S.A., you find that Americans give more per
individual than the Europeans. That could be because most European countries
have far more social services in place to help people that need help (and a lot
higher taxes to pay for it).
The favorable U.S. comparison starts
falling apart when you do economic aid by country. The U.S. is only fourth
behind the United Kingdom, France and Japan when it comes to total dollar
amount given.
Here is a real shocker: When you
look at it per capita, the United States is 19th, behind all European countries
except Italy. The No. 1 country is Luxembourg, which gives $519 per person. The
United States gives $25 per person. You can find all the stats at
NationMaster.com.
In all fairness, Father Williams
should consider an article entitled “The More Atheist a Country, the More Aid
They Give.”
I certainly feel the real reason for
the title of the article is the usual Christian approach to paint atheists in
the most unpleasant light possible, regardless if it is true or not. One does
not want the flock straying.
Art
Rigsby
Nampa,
Idaho
Father
Williams’ response: I must
express admiration for this undaunted letter writer. He takes up a tremendously
difficult case much like an enthusiastic defense lawyer who knows his client is
guilty but defends him tooth and nail nonetheless. And like a defense lawyer
facing an uphill battle, he desperately looks for a legal loophole rather than
address the devastating evidence that confirms his client’s guilt. The simple
fact is: Whether we call them secularists or atheists, the record shows that
those who live as if God did not exist are notoriously less generous with their
time and their property than religious believers. Bringing up the international
question with its myriad complexities serves only to muddle the crystal-clear
findings of a careful study done among Americans. Fortunately, Register readers
are not as naïve as our letter writer seems to think and can separate fact from
rhetorical sleight of hand.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Make a Donation now!
Insightful. Informative. Uncompromisingly faithful. The National Catholic Register is more than a newspaper. It’s a cause. Your support for the Register funds important journalism that helps to build a Culture of Life in our nation, and throughout the world. Help us promote the Church’s New Evangelization by donating to the National Catholic Register right now.