An Urgent Message from Fr. Owen Kearns LC, Publisher
What we deliver with our journalism, we cannot deliver without your generosity.
The National Catholic Register needs your help. Revenue from subscriptions and advertising can't keep up with the rising cost of payroll, printing, postage and other expenses. We must rely on donations to make up the difference. To continue our hard-hitting investigative reporting, we need your financial support. Please donate today.
...or click here to learn about donating to specific projects.
Donations to Circle Media are tax-deductible. (Photo credits/CNS)
August 31- September 6, 2008 Issue |
Posted 8/26/08 at 1:51 PM
The good
news: Barack Obama’s vice presidential candidate will be Sen. Joe Biden of
Delaware, a Catholic who says he accepts the Church’s teaching on abortion and
struggles with his conscience over abortion votes. But the bad news renders
that good news bad: Biden’s conscience struggle tends to end with him doing the
bidding of the abortion industry.
A great deal has been made of the
fact that Biden once voted to ban partial-birth abortion. That’s the abortion
procedure in which a full-term child is killed while exiting the birth canal.
We’re glad he voted the right way, but forgive us if we don’t applaud.
We're not surprised Biden wanted
partial-birth abortion to be illegal five years ago. We’re astonished Obama
wants it legal now.
And don’t let the 2003 rating of
NARAL (National Abortion Rights Action League) Pro-Choice America fool you.
Yes, the year he voted to ban partial-birth abortion, he pleased NARAL only a
third of the time. But here is Biden’s NARAL record for every year since: 2004,
100%; 2005, 100%; 2006, 100%; 2007, 75%.
Asked if he believes life starts at
conception, Obama refused to answer. But Biden said: “I am prepared to accept
my Church’s view. ... I have to accept that on faith.”
We have some follow-up questions. If
he believes life begins at conception, why did Biden vote against making unborn
children eligible for “S-CHIP” state health care for kids? If you are for
health care and for the “little guy,” why refuse care to the littlest among us?
Why did Biden vote that unborn
victims in federal crimes don’t count? In the case of a pregnant victim in the
Oklahoma City bombing of a federal building, state police would hold Timothy
McVeigh responsible for a father’s two losses: his wife and his unborn
children. Biden, who knows better, would only hold him responsible for one.
Why did Biden vote to allow
out-of-state abortion businesses to prey on minors from other states? Why did
he even vote that those out-of-state abortion sites need not inform parents
when they sell an abortion to their daughters? Together, these votes were a
gift to abortion moneymakers and to men who want an easy way to “take care of
the problem” when they impregnate underage girls.
Biden says he is against federal
funding for abortions. Then why did he vote to allow abortions on military
bases?
It should be pointed out that both
Joe Biden and Sen. John McCain, the presumptive GOP nominee, have voted to
federally fund embryonic stem-cell research. To be clear: They would transfer
money from taxpayers’ paychecks into the coffers of embryo-killing research
firms.
Truth be told, while Biden has said
consoling things about abortion, we can only go by what he has done. His votes
serve the bottom line of killer industries, not the mothers and their children
who pay the ultimate price for those profits.
That’s such a scandal that the
Church says pro-abortion Catholic politicians shouldn’t receive Communion. In
2004, Biden’s own Bishop, Michael Saltarelli, wrote a column embracing the U.S.
bishops’ “Statement on Catholics in Political Life.” In it, he asked
politicians who support abortion laws not to present themselves for Communion.
“The promotion of abortion by any
Catholic is a grave and serious matter,” he wrote. “I ask Catholics in this
position to have the integrity to respect the Eucharist, Catholic teaching and
the Catholic faithful.”
Bishop Saltarelli’s approach echoes
the one recommended in 2004 by Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger. Before he became Pope
Benedict XVI, he wrote to Cardinal Theodore McCarrick:
“Regarding the grave sin of abortion
or euthanasia, when a person’s formal cooperation becomes manifest (understood,
in the case of a Catholic politician, as his consistently campaigning and
voting for permissive abortion and euthanasia laws), his pastor should meet
with him, instructing him about the Church’s teaching, informing him that he is
not to present himself for holy Communion until he brings to an end the
objective situation of sin, and warning him that he will otherwise be denied
the Eucharist.”
Biden was also at odds with Pope
John Paul II and Cardinal Ratzinger on the question of the Iraq war. Like
McCain (who isn’t a Catholic) he voted for it. But war questions are different.
“If a Catholic were to be at odds
with the Holy Father on the application of capital punishment or on the
decision to wage war, he would not for that reason be considered unworthy to
present himself to receive holy Communion,” wrote Cardinal Ratzinger. “While
the Church exhorts civil authorities to seek peace, not war, and to exercise
discretion and mercy in imposing punishment on criminals, it may still be
permissible to take up arms to repel an aggressor or to have recourse to
capital punishment. There may be a legitimate diversity of opinion even among
Catholics about waging war and applying the death penalty, but not however with
regard to abortion and euthanasia.”
It would be better for Joe Biden if
he weren’t Catholic and didn’t know better. But he is and he does.
In the days of slavery, there were
many pro-slavery Catholics. Despite the constant and firm papal teaching
against slavery, they darken the Church’s reputation. In missionary days there
were abusive conquistadors. Despite the many good works of the missions, the
abuse is often used to sum up the Church’s approach.
A majority of Americans have already
turned against the slaughter of abortion. A century from now, the Church’s
opponents will be making a new accusation: They will blame the Church for
abortion. Unfortunately, they will have a point. They will name the prominent
Catholics in our day — especially candidates on the last two presidential
tickets — and judge the Church not by Church teaching, but by the actions of
Catholics.
We have all seen ultrasound images.
We all know women who were under severe pressure to abort children, then in
severe pain once they did. Some Catholics have made a deal with the dark side —
and have become agents of the destruction and despair that follow in abortion’s
wake. But that’s not the story of our Church.
The rest of us need to do all we can
to make certain the Church’s real story is told. In letters to their campaigns,
in letters to editors, in town hall meetings and above all with our votes, we
need to say: Enough is enough. We are a Church of life, not death. That is the
legacy we want to leave.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Make a Donation now!
Insightful. Informative. Uncompromisingly faithful. The National Catholic Register is more than a newspaper. It’s a cause. Your support for the Register funds important journalism that helps to build a Culture of Life in our nation, and throughout the world. Help us promote the Church’s New Evangelization by donating to the National Catholic Register right now.