An Urgent Message from Fr. Owen Kearns LC, Publisher
What we deliver with our journalism, we cannot deliver without your generosity.
The National Catholic Register needs your help. Revenue from subscriptions and advertising can't keep up with the rising cost of payroll, printing, postage and other expenses. We must rely on donations to make up the difference. To continue our hard-hitting investigative reporting, we need your financial support. Please donate today.
...or click here to learn about donating to specific projects.
Donations to Circle Media are tax-deductible. (Photo credits/CNS)
August 31- September 6, 2008 Issue |
Posted 8/26/08 at 1:38 PM
As the long
days of summer draw to a close, I can see the gleam of hope glimmering in the
eyes of the other mothers at the park. It is the longing for September, for
moments of solitude, and for an end to the perennial banalities of parenthood.
I am a sort of rare bird in the
pack: I have no September burning on the horizon — so long as it’s not too hot
and muggy, I’ll take August. September just means that we pack in four lessons
a day instead of the one or two that fill out the lazy summer home-school
schedule. The other mothers look at me as though I am a kind of madwoman or
saint. How do I do it? With four children? They’ve only got two, and they’re
chomping at the bit to get them out of their hair.
It’s very tempting to bask in the
glow of awe and disbelief, but the truth is: I cheat.
The large (by modern standards)
family, the stay-at-home-mom thing, the decision to home school — they are
really a kind of pay-up-front and then live-debt-free variety of family
planning. I talked to a lot of moms, read a lot of articles, looked at my
parents’ eight-child family, and then I did some mental calculations.
I came to a fairly simple
conclusion: More time with more kids is a good idea — not a cross, not a
burden, not an act of heroic virtue, but a proactive solution to a thousand
problems more insoluble and heartrending than dirty diapers and math problems.
It seems impossible to a lot of
people. You need two parents working, and it is hideously expensive to have a
child. I once read an article where it claimed that the cost of having a single
baby was greater than the annual income of my four-child household. I was
astonished — where was all that money going?
Most of it was going to services.
The small have become their own marketing bracket, and parents have been sold
the idea that the best way to raise a happy child is to let the experts get
their fingers into the kid as often as possible. You need day-care workers,
pediatricians, music teachers, certified babysitters, schoolteachers, social
workers, nutrition experts, child psychologists, soccer coaches, and so on and
so on. All of this is exceedingly expensive, and it is draining.
Half the parents I know are in the
car driving their child to one thing or another more often than they are
actually together with the family. They’re constantly fighting with their son
to force him to attend the expensive martial arts lessons that he briefly
wanted before Christmas. They spend at least a half hour a night arguing about
homework. They’re so busy that their children can’t have friends without
organizing “playdates.”
This is insanity — and I have little
doubt that it will drive a parent mad to act as chauffeur to one pint-size
jet-setter, let alone two.
Yet, people really believe that this
is necessary: You have to send them to
Kindergym. They need to be in three
different organized sports. They require the best
equipment and a $300 sequined jumpsuit for the big performance. If we had
another kid, we would have to cut back — and then all of the children would be
shortchanged.
At the heart of this is a lack of
parental confidence. We have been led to believe that we are not competent to
look after, teach and raise our own children. This is simply untrue. Every
parent has skills that can be passed on, and children, particularly when they are
small, love learning to do the things that mommy and daddy do.
Ditch the art lessons, and buy a
family membership at the local museum. Pick up a pad of paper and some decent
pencils. Spend the afternoon sketching suits of armor or stuffed parrots. There
are several perks to this plan: The family membership costs the same amount
regardless of whether you have two kids or seven; you can sit for a minute and
practice your cross-hatching while they’re trying to figure out how many eyes
to put on an Egyptian mummy; and the kids learn history and art at the same
time.
Teaching is a more rewarding
occupation than taxi driving, and children who spend more time doing real
things with their parents are more respectful, better behaved, more articulate
(they’re learning their vocabulary from you, not from other 4-year-olds), have
a clearer sense of right and wrong, and have stronger loyalties to their
family. Up front, you pay by putting aside the other things that you would like
to be doing instead. In the long run, you have less stress because you are
raising small human beings, not barely domesticated monkeys.
The key to joyful parenting is to
draw on the strengths and benefits of having children. Women from Africa line
up in front of the U.N. to protest birth control
and sterilization programs. Why? They see children as a valuable addition to
the family, not as a burden on its resources.
Parents tend to think that we are
overburdened and can’t handle more. How often do I make of myself a sort of
upside-down Atlas, with shoulders hunched, head bent down, struggling to hold
the weight of my own feet off the ground so that I can imagine that the world
rests on my shoulders? If I simply right myself, and let the ground support me
instead of trying to support it, I find that Christ’s words are true: His yoke
is easy, and his burden light.
Children are useful. They can plant
seeds in gardens, they can wash floors with “scrubber skates,” they can make
peanut butter sandwiches and read stories to younger siblings. You just have to
teach them how. One half hour of instruction today, and you never have to scrub
another floor again. If you have a continual supply of kids, you’ll always have
one who is the right age to really want to play
“Cinderella.”
This is not cruelty. The myth of the
carefree child, eternally happy frolicking in Never-Never Land, is ridiculous.
Children need responsibilities. When
they are constantly treated and entertained, they don’t learn self-control or
self-motivation or critical thinking. When responsibility suddenly crashes down
on their shoulders at the age of 18, they crumble and despair. Why shouldn’t
they? If you’ve been carried in a litter all your life, a mile-long hike will
feel like a marathon.
Lack of discipline does not make
children happy. Spoiled children don’t constantly laugh and smile. They always
covet more treats and snivel at every minor slight of their wills.
It’s not because they’re bad, but
because they can feel that there is something wrong — that “Dora the Explorer”
and ice pops don’t add up to real fulfillment. The heart, even of a child, is
hungry for greater things than this.
It is hungry to love, to give, to be
valuable. Give these gifts to your children, and you will find that they are no
longer a burden — but a help in the great project of being human.
Next Week: The Truth About
Parenthood.
Melinda Selmys is a staff writer
at VulgataMagazine.org.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Make a Donation now!
Insightful. Informative. Uncompromisingly faithful. The National Catholic Register is more than a newspaper. It’s a cause. Your support for the Register funds important journalism that helps to build a Culture of Life in our nation, and throughout the world. Help us promote the Church’s New Evangelization by donating to the National Catholic Register right now.