Current Issue

Print Edition: February 12, 2012

 



3 Free Issues!

Try the Register at no risk. Click here.

  • Donate
  • Archives
  • Blogs
  • Store
  • Resources
  • Advertise
  • Jobs
  • Radio
  • Subscribe
  • Make This
    My Homepage
  • Resources
  • Christmas Music
  • Arts & Entertainment
  • Books
  • Commentary
  • Culture of Life
  • Education
  • In Person
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Sunday Guides
  • Travel
  • Vatican
  • Dan Burke
  • Edward Pentin
  • Mark Shea
  • Matthew Warner
  • Jimmy Akin
  • Matt & Pat Archbold
  • Simcha Fisher
  • Tito Edwards
  • Jennifer Fulwiler
  • Steven D. Greydanus
  • Tim Drake
  • Tom Wehner
  • Our Latest Show
  • About the Show
  • About the Register
  • Donate
  • Subscribe
  • Stations
  • Schedule
  • Other EWTN Shows
  • Advertising Overview
  • Editorial Calendar
  • Order Web Ad
  • Order Print Ad
Print Article | Email Article | Write To Us
Print Edition » Culture of Life

An Analysis of Depo-Provera

Share
by rob1, Register correspondent Sunday, Apr 12, 1998 12:00 AM Comment

Depo-Provera is an injectable contraceptive that also has abortifacient characteristics. Its active ingredient is depot-medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA), a synthetic form of the natural hormone progesterone, originally developed for the treatment of uterine cancer in the 1950s. A woman receives 150 milligrams of DMPA via deep intramuscular injection every three months.

Depo-Provera was approved for use in the United States in October 1992. However, in June of 1993, Canada's Department of Heath and Welfare prohibited the use of DepoProvera, saying that the drug does not meet Canadian safety standards as a contraceptive.

The drug is now available in more than 90 countries and is particularly popular in Indonesia, Jamaica, Thailand, Kenya, and New Zealand.

The manufacturer, Upjohn, extensively tested DepoProvera on Third World women before submitting it to the FDA for approval. The World Health Organization (WHO) used Depo-Provera on more than 11,000 women in Kenya, Mexico, and Thailand.

According to Upjohn's information pamphlet, DepoProvera:

l “[has a] contraceptive effect produced by inhibiting the secretion of gonadotropins (FSH, LH), which prevents follicular maturation and ovulation [and]

l suppresses the endometrium [the mucous membrane lining the uterus] and changes cervical mucus.’

Many women's menstrual cycles continue when using Depo-Provera: 43% after 12 months and 32% after 24 months. This data shows that the compound does not completely suppress ovulation in a large percentage of women who use Depo-Provera.

Contraceptive Technology confirms that Depo-Provera has a triphasic (three-way) action. It inhibits ovulation and thickens cervical mucus (which are both contraceptive actions), but it also alters the endometrium (the lining of the uterus) so that its degree of receptivity to the blastocyst (very early developing human being) is significantly decreased. According to Contraceptive Technology, “Other contraceptive actions include the development of a shallow and atrophic [thinning] endometrium….’

When Depo-Provera works in this way, it is an abortifacient. Upjohn's information pamphlet also lists more than 60 adverse reactions suffered by various percentages of women who use the compound.

Women on Depo-Provera report an average weight gain of 5.4 pounds in the first year and 16.5 pounds over six years. Depo-Provera users commonly also experience osteoporosis (loss of bone mass). Some users suffer jaundice, a decrease in glucose tolerance, and convulsions.

In women who have used Depo-Provera for the first time within the last four years, and who are under 35 years of age, the risk of breast cancer increases 129%. There appears to be no increased risk of ovarian, liver, or cervical cancer.

Source: The Facts of Life: An Authoritative Guide to Life and Family Issues, by Brian Clowes PhD (Human Life International, Front Royal, Va.). Reprinted with permission.

Subscribe to the National Catholic Register!  Click here to begin a trial subscription to the print edition, and receive 3 free issues with no risk and no obligation.

Filed under

Comments

Post a Comment

Post a Comment

By submitting this form, you give The National Catholic Register permission to publish this comment. Comments will be published at our discretion, and may be edited for clarity and length. For best formatting, please limit your response to one paragraph and don't hit "enter" to force line breaks.

Name:

Email:

Write your comment:

     

Notify me of follow-up comments.

Also in this Issue

  • Arts & Culture

    A Fifth Grader’s Theological Search
  • Commentary

  • Culture of Life

    The Gospel Of Life
  • Web of Pornography Spreads in the Land
  • Battles of Words Carry Deep MeaningIn Abortion Controversies
  • With Music, a New Generation of Pro-lifers Sends a Message Loud and Clear
  • Education

    The Bigotry Of Blaine Amendments
  • In Person

    Stirring U.S. Consciences In a Century of Martyrdom
  • News

    A Few Post-Oscar Grumblings on Titanic
  • Life in the VIRTUAL CULTURE
  • A Time To Regroup For Ongoing Struggle for Life
  • A Communications Master Dodges His Biographer
  • Intimations of the Trinity’s Third Person
  • PERSPECTIVE
  • U.S. Notes & Quotes
  • U.S. Notes & Quotes
  • Groups Oppose Clinton’s Luxembourg Ambassador Nominee
  • Vatican Newspaper Continues Stressing Distinct Roles of Laity and Priests
  • Global Effort to Weed Out Corruption Widely Supported by Church
  • Republicans Look to Eliminate ‘Tax Penalty’ For Married Couples
  • ‘O Death, Where Is Thy Sting?í
  • Opinion

    LETTERS
  • Vatican

Most Popular Now

  • Most Read
  • Most Commented
  • Blogs

    Ten Reasons There Are No Women in Hell (16843)
  • Blogs

    Why My Big Family Is Not Overpopulating the Earth (15844)
  • Daily News

    160-Plus Bishops Speak Out Against HHS Mandate (12474)
  • Blogs

    Komen & Planned Parenthood: The Real Lesson (10511)
  • Daily News

    How to Beat the Devil (9728)
  • Blogs

    Inside the Mind of Evil: Obama Administration's HHS Decision (9706)
  • Blogs

    Spokeswoman of Evil Speaks! (8261)
  • Daily News

    Rubio Introduces Bill to Protect Church Organizations Against Obama's Mandate (7735)
  • Blogs

    Inside the Mind of Evil: Obama Administration's HHS Decision (133)
  • Blogs

    Why My Big Family Is Not Overpopulating the Earth (131)
  • Blogs

    Catholics, Get Ready to Suffer (108)
  • Blogs

    Why I'm Donating to Susan G. Komen - UPDATED (105)
  • Daily News

    160-Plus Bishops Speak Out Against HHS Mandate (103)
  • Blogs

    Which Disney Villain is the Most Evil? (94)
  • Blogs

    Ten Reasons There Are No Women in Hell (84)
  • Blogs

    Spokeswoman of Evil Speaks! (83)

E-mail Signup

Receive our free e-mail updates!

As part of this free service, you will receive occasional special offers

 

National Catholic Register

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Archives
  • Subscriptions
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Press Releases
  • RSS Daily Register
  • RSS Bloggers
  • RSS Print
  • Contact
  • Jobs

Copyright © 2012 EWTN News, Inc. All rights reserved.
Reproduction of material from this website without written permission is strictly prohibited.
Accessed from 38.107.179.234