Click here to listen!
NCRegister
  National Catholic Register  
11.20.09

A generous donor will DOUBLE donations to the Register up to $240,000 through November 28.

Donate Now

DOUBLE YOUR DONATION

Click to donate

GIVE BEFORE this matching offer ends!

Learn more

For information about the Register's ANNUAL FUND Drive, click here

Last 7 Days 30 Days

 
DAILY UMBERT

EMAIL SIGN UP

Receive our free email updates!

Sign up below


As part of this free service, you will receive occasional special offers.





Print Article | Email Article | Write To Us | Support Us  

Unmaking Abortionists, Part II

Share

Posted by Tom McFeely

Wednesday, November 26, 2008 9:36 PM

Lesley Wojick

It’s been pointed out to the Daily Blog by some thoughtful readers (including Mrs. Daily Blog, my lovely wife Alina) that a false impression may have been created by an earlier post.

The Unmaking of an Abortionist reported on a compelling article published last weekend by The Washington Post. The article is a superbly written account of how a pro-abortion medical student turned away from her plan to become an abortionist, even though she remains deeply committed to abortion rights.

The concern expressed with drawing attention to the article on the Daily Blog is that this might be read as an endorsement of the overall tone of the original Washington Post article, which was written from the implied premise that being pro-abortion is to occupy the high moral ground.

But in our judgment, that’s what makes the account of Lesley Wojick’s decision to renounce her aspiration to become an abortionist especially important.

Even though Wojick continues to adhere to the morally wrong and indeed reprehensible belief that a woman’s right to “choose” to kill her unborn child trumps that innocent and helpless child’s right to life, when faced with the brutal reality of participating in the actual killing of unborn babies the pro-abortion medical student concluded her only choice was to find a better way to employ the healing skills she is acquiring as a doctor-in-training.

The Daily Blog stands by its earlier judgment about the merit of drawing attention to the Washington Post article. And we’re not alone — Dave Andrusko of National Right to Life comes to a similar conclusion here.

But we respect the concerns of those who suggested to us that clarification was needed about why we chose to highlight the article. And we hope that this second Daily Blog entry helps to clear that question up.

— Tom McFeely

Advertisement
Advertisement

Make a Donation now!

Insightful. Informative. Uncompromisingly faithful. The National Catholic Register is more than a newspaper. It’s a cause. Your support for the Register funds important journalism that helps to build a Culture of Life in our nation, and throughout the world. Help us promote the Church’s New Evangelization by donating to the National Catholic Register right now.

Click here to donate

Current Issue

Important News for Register Subscribers. Click here for details.

You must login for access to articles that are marked For Subscribers Only.

If you subscribe to the print edition, register here to get a Username and Password.

Not a Subscriber? Click here to try
4 Issues FREE!

Now you can subscribe to the digital edition of the Register! Save 29% off the print edition price! Click here for details.








Click here to listen!