Once upon a time, Catholics (in contrast to Protestants) were not well-acquainted with the Bible. Although Protestants generally remain more familiar with the Bible, Catholics today — thanks to the revised Lectionary, parish study groups and individual reading — know Scripture better than in the past.
Both Catholics and Protestants, however, share a common ignorance of Patristics, the study of the Church Fathers who lived from about A.D. 100-700. The Orthodox and Eastern Catholics know the Fathers well, but Western Christians are largely unaware of the rich heritage of Patrology.
Jimmy Akin, a Protestant convert, Register blogger and devoted apologist with Catholic Answers, set out to remedy this deficiency. Akin even sees the ecumenical potential of this project: If classical Protestantism sees itself as recovering pure, unadulterated Christianity free of Catholic dross, then how does one discover what primitive Christianity looked like and believed? How does one begin to probe “the many other things” that Jesus did and taught, for which the whole world might not suffice to keep the record (John 21:25)?
“A large majority of Christians today believe that all one needs to know about the early Church can be gleaned from the Book of Acts,” Akin writes. “But if the inspired words of the New Testament do not contain all that the apostles taught the early Christians, then how does one discover the rest of what these early Christians believed? The answer to this — at least for hundreds of modern Protestant ministers who have found their way home to the Catholic Church — is in the writings of the early Church Fathers.”
The author calls his work a “handbook — you do not have to read it from beginning to end.” As in: Pick it up and see what interests you.
This “handbook” is divided into two parts. Part I provides a thorough but popular and readable introduction to the world of the Church Fathers. It includes a discussion of the regions where the Fathers were active (Israel, Turkey, Greece, Rome, North Africa and Western Europe). It also provides brief but adequate biographies of 83 Fathers, short summaries of 18 early Church councils (both ecumenical and regional), synopses of 25 early writings like the Didache, and brief definitions of 28 heresies that plagued the early Church.
Part II considers specific elements of Catholic faith and morality, coupled with excerpts from the Fathers showing just how continuous Catholic doctrinal development has been. Topics include God, one and triune; Christ; creation; the canon of Scripture; the Church, its hierarchical foundations and Petrine Ministry; the sacraments; Mary; moral issues (abortion, contraception, homosexual activity and astrology); and eschatology. Think the Church just dreamed up its teaching against abortion? Akin quotes the Didache, a first-century Christian document, affirming “you shall not murder a child by abortion.”
Critics of this book might say that Akin repeats the same error committed by many Protestants: He relies on “proof texts,” plucking citations out of context to grind his apologetical axes.
On the one hand, owing to its introductory and popular nature, this book neither can nor should get into all the subtleties that historical Patristic exegesis requires. On the other hand, one should not miss the forest for the trees: Despite their individual variations, there exists a common (albeit developing) faith consensus among the Fathers. The Fathers strove to “think with the Church” (sentire cum Ecclesia, as St. Augustine put it). It is that consensus that Akin seeks to introduce to a popular audience.
A good introduction to the world of the Fathers, this book is enlightening, worth the read and definitely worth the price.
Register correspondent John M. Grondelski writes from Bern, Switzerland.
THE FATHERS KNOW BEST
Your Essential Guide to the Teachings of the Early Church
By Jimmy Akin
Catholic Answers, 2010
452 pages, $24.95
To order: Catholic Answers
(888) 291-8000
Tim Drake: Register Radio: Women Religious & "For Greater Glory"
Comments
Post a Comment
I love the Fathers of the Church and try to make my adult RE class familiar with their wonderful insights and commentary.
Protestants know what they have left of the Bible very well indeed except for the portions they studiously ignore. We need to catch up and surpass in both cases.
You begin with the commonest Protestant stereotype, and not a shred of evidence: “Once upon a time, Catholics (in contrast to Protestants) were not well-acquainted with the Bible.” This is standard Reformation silliness. The founder of the Menonites, a Catholic priest, claimed that he had never read a single word the Bible until he became Protestant. Clearly, he had never attended Mass, never offered Mass, never prayed his required breviary in his entire life, or he’d have recognized the Bible readings in the Mass and the breviary.
Book looks interesting. Just one thought though, when did “ROMAN” become the exclusive word to identify CATHOLIC. The early areas, as mentioned above, are CATHOLIC in the sense of universal. I want to know the early Fathers and the Councils but it is with trepidation that such credence is given to these manuscripts as equal to Scripture. Yes, you claim to be the ones who decided what is the Canon, but Protestant scholars have advanced polemics to question your presuppositions (though I honestly have drawn a blank to back up my big mouth). But I will get the book—Jimmy Akin is worthy of reading and this introductory venture will be of much benefit.
@ Lagniappe
These manuscripts and others, namely accounts of eccumenical councils etc, comprise the Historical aspect of the Roman Catholic faith and as such ARE equal to Scripture along with Tradition. Catholics understand Sola Scriptura as being contradicted by Scripture.
As a new convert to Catholicism, this book was a valuable resource for me. There is a reason that the Church Fathers believed what they did. These guys were close to the action. Their writings are not infalable, but in whole, they reflect the beliefs of the earliest Christians. Their thoughts bear more weight with me than those of someone who is 2,000 years removed. In their writings, I can see the teachings of today’s Catholic Church.
Post a Comment
By submitting this form, you give The National Catholic Register permission to publish this comment. Comments will be published at our discretion, and may be edited for clarity and length. For best formatting, please limit your response to one paragraph and don't hit "enter" to force line breaks.