When a relatively unknown bishop of a backwater diocese in Pennsylvania was named archbishop of New York in 1984, he didn’t take long to get himself on the front page of The New York Times.
Even before he took up residence in the city, Archbishop-designate John Joseph O’Connor went on a television talk show and compared abortion to the Nazi Holocaust of the Jews. Father Charles Connor relates the story in John Cardinal O’Connor and the Culture of Life.
Two days later, The New York Times reacted with characteristic negativity. O’Connor was informed that his remarks carried highly offensive implications, and because of that, he might not be as ready for the media capital of the world as originally thought. … It was suggested that the new archbishop adopt ‘a change in tone’ if his administration was to have effect.
If nothing else, Cardinal O’Connor had a great sense for making news, and even admitted that he would “use” the media to advance the message of the Gospel. The cardinal knew he had a big pulpit, and he strove to use it for good. Hardly a month passed in the Big Apple that one of the tabloids didn’t have him on the front page. Some people felt the cardinal was too free in expressing himself. “Is there anything he doesn’t have an opinion about?” one indignant observer wondered.
And yet, as one of his former secretaries, Cardinal-designate Edwin O’Brien, points out in a foreword to Father Connor’s book, the cardinal was exactly what was needed at the time. Though O’Connor was appointed to New York only 11 years since the Supreme Court handed down Roe v. Wade, legal abortion was already an entrenched position on the part of most of the political establishment and the mainstream media. Most right-believing Americans were dispirited on the issue, and Cardinal O’Connor’s was a voice of clarity that burned through the fog.
Father Connor, a priest of the Diocese of Scranton, Pa., which Bishop O’Connor headed for a few months before the New York post opened up, takes us back a step, reminding us what it was like to grow up in an America before the 1960s, when the sexual and cultural revolutions changed everything — and when states began liberalizing their abortion laws. It was the America the future cardinal had grown up in, with his humble beginnings in Philadelphia in the 1920s; he was the son of a metal worker, a child of a churchgoing family whose parents expected their children to respect their elders.
“The culture in which John O’Connor was raised was vastly different from the one he engaged,” Father Connor writes. He quotes Cardinal O’Connor as reflecting: “There was a day when family values were taken for granted. There was a day when purity, when chastity were taken for granted. There was a day when it was taken for granted that children would obey parents, that we would all obey authority.”
With the legalization of abortion, everything changed. Father Connor returns several times to a favorite theme of O’Connor’s: The law is a great teacher. People growing up in a culture in which abortion is legal come to accept the practice as moral — there’s “nothing wrong with it.”
By the time of his death in 2000, Cardinal O’Connor had become one of the most prominent pro-life voices in the world, surely ranking with Blessed Pope John Paul II and Blessed Teresa of Calcutta. It was the pro-life movement’s great good fortune that John Paul had appointed O’Connor as “archbishop of the capital of the world,” as the Pope himself later would quip. The archbishop of New York mustered all his intellectual and rhetorical skills to serve the cause of life. Many people who are pro-life today can credit the cardinal for their own formation. I myself recall reading his weekly column in Catholic New York, the archdiocesan newspaper, at a time when I was finding my way to a renewed engagement with the Catholic faith. I found that his arguments made sense. Not that he wrote about life issues every week. But what he wrote usually struck a chord with me, and his pro-life arguments strengthened in me a deepening sense that unborn life must be protected. Having grown up in the 1960s, I actually didn’t think that was all that important. Cardinal O’Connor helped me see otherwise.
Though Father Connor’s book reads at times like a thesis written for an advanced academic degree (he is, after all, a Church historian), it is a thorough look at John Joseph O’Connor’s efforts to inject common sense into a world that had gone mad with an obsession to protect “women’s reproductive rights.” It was perhaps a sense of that madness that made the cardinal realize that more — much more — was needed besides speeches, writings, marches and even disciplining members of his flock who failed to stand up for life in the political realm. Indeed, the real heart of Father Connor’s book comes in the second half.
The genesis of Cardinal O’Connor’s inspiration to found the Sisters of Life came several years before he was archbishop of New York, during a visit to the remains of the Nazi concentration camp in Dachau. He vowed to protect the sacredness of every human life. A few years after coming to New York, he wrote a column in Catholic New York that took on the character of a help-wanted ad. The help he wanted was from professional women who were willing to give their lives to the cause of life.
The column attracted a number of such women, and an initial discernment retreat led to the formation of a nascent community, the Sisters of Life. The sisters, whose community is thriving today, take the traditional three vows of poverty, chastity and obedience, but also a fourth vow: to defend human life in all its stages.
But a great deal of what the sisters are all about is summed up in Mark 9:29, as the cardinal often pointed out. The Gospel passage describes how Christ’s disciples complained that, even though the Master had commissioned them to go out and heal and cast out demons there were some devils that would not be cast out. The Messiah advised them, “This kind of demon can only be cast out through prayer and fasting.”
Thus, the Sisters of Life are a contemplative-active community. They are active in teaching and in helping pregnant women choose life. But the more important part of their apostolate takes place on their knees.
Father Connor bases much of this section of the book on reports in Catholic New York and archives of the Sisters of Life, particularly talks the cardinal gave at regular discernment retreats. They are talks that are spiritually rich, and Father Connor is to be thanked for bringing them to us. The book also contains a reflection by Mother Agnes Donovan, the longtime mother general of the Sisters of Life, on the “Spirituality of John Cardinal O’Connor.”
All the columns, all the homilies, all the fights with pro-abortion Catholic politicians, all the controversial statements, all the front-page headlines in The New York Post, even the scholarly addresses at home and abroad (including some very impressive work at the Vatican), could not compare to what surely was Cardinal O’Connor’s finest work and which will be his greatest legacy.
The book is called John Cardinal O’Connor and the Culture of Life, and the cardinal’s greatest contribution to restoring a culture of life in our society is documented here, in Father Connor’s description of the founding of the Sisters of Life.
John Burger is the Register’s news editor and a former reporter for Catholic New York.
JOHN CARDINAL O’CONNOR AND THE CULTURE OF LIFE
by Father Charles Connor
St. Pauls/Alba House, 2011
112 pages, $14.95
To order: AlbaHouse.org
(800) 343-2522
Edward Pentin: Pope Francis Prays at Blessed John Paul II's Tomb
Tim Drake: Register Radio: HHS Mandate Update and Chart-topping Advent Music
Comments
Post a Comment
Once per year, we would go to a small suite in the Waldorf on a Saturday in the dead of winter, see a show Saturday evening and make Cardinal O’Connor’s Mass on Sunday morning. Homilies were short with a good message. Loved the man. RIP
During the brief period that Cardinal O’Connor served as Bishop of Scranton, I was a young academic administrator at the local Jesuit university. (We didn’t think of ourselves as a backwater—nor, as far as I am aware, did he.) That May, the new bishop gave the principal address at the University of Scranton commencement. I was in a position to see that he spoke from spare notes; but everything he uttered—including, of course, large pro-life themes—came out in perfect English sentences. The Dean of the College of Arts and Sciences said to me afterward that it was the best commencement speech he had ever heard. Now, over 25 years later, I can concur with a conviction born of long experience.
A few years afterward, I had become dean and a young priest of the Diocese of Scranton came to me asking if he might teach an occasional course in history. Yes, it was Father Charles Connor—whose new book I very much look forward to reading.
John W. Carlson
So glad that Father has written abook about this man of God.
I, too, will look forward to reading this book and compare it to the book called “Cardinal Bernardin - Easing conflicts - and battling for the soul of American Catholicism” in which it was said about Bernardin’s adding so called social justice issues to the word “prolife” will, among other things, “keep the prolife movement from falling completely under the control of the right wing conservatives who were becoming its dominant sponsors,” a statement Bernardin never contested or denied. It is a shame the U.S. Bishops went along with Bernardin’s idea for “prolife,” they basically killed the movement in order to save the Democrat Party.
Would homosexual marriage have become legal in New York State if O’Connor were in charge? What would he have done differently? http://www.rpconradio.com
Backwater diocese? Shame, shame on you. Coal miners diocese, Scranton, and I’m glad the Pope agreed with that gem of a find.
I miss him very much, and credit him with the reinforcement of that healthy pride and happiness in being Catholic that I needed as a teen, and need still today. I asked his blessing many times, and most especially on my stethoscope (still in constant use), that my work as a physician might be a blessing in turn to others. I’d never heard anyone of stature say they were sorry if a situation were misjudged. It made his stature the more imposing when he proclaimed unchanging truths. He was never afraid to be an apologist for the faith, and assert our rights to practice it fully in the public forum. Recent legislation seems to force the hands of Catholics and others into providing contraceptive and abortion procedural insurance. I miss his wisdom and guidance, and although we have many gifted leaders, I cannot help but wonder what he might have said, and might have done in this instance. Pray for us, dear shepherd.
There is a new petition on the White House website regarding the Birth Control Mandate.
http://wh.gov/K4K
To those who took umbrage at the use of my term “backwater diocese,” I offer my apology. Guess I was writing from the perspective of a New Yorker who assumes there’s not much happening west of the Hudson River. Anyway, when Bishop O’Connor’s name was first announced as successor to Cardinal Cooke, probably most New Yorkers had never heard of Scranton. But yes, you’re just as important as anyone else in the Church Universal. Besides, Steamtown is one thing New York doesn’t have.
Post a Comment
By submitting this form, you give The National Catholic Register permission to publish this comment. Comments will be published at our discretion, and may be edited for clarity and length. For best formatting, please limit your response to one paragraph and don't hit "enter" to force line breaks.