Print Article | Email Article | Write To Us

Daily News

SDG Reviews 'The Secret World of Arrietty' (5521)

There’s a world of wonder under the floorboards in this gentle, wholesome family-film delight.

02/13/2012 Comments (21)
Disney

– Disney

The Secret World of Arrietty just might change the way you look at the world around you — right around you. A wide-eyed sense of discovery and revelation permeates the film, and what it reveals is ... the mystery and wonder of an ordinary home.

Written by animation master Hayao Miyazaki and helmed by animator and first-time director Yonebayashi Hiromasa, The Secret World of Arrietty follows in the footsteps of ultra-gentle Studio Ghibli family fare like Ponyo, My Neighbor Totoro and Kiki’s Delivery Service. Ghibli films are renowned for painterly animation rich in authentic detail—yet seldom if ever has a Ghibli film, or any film, looked quite so closely and lovingly at the trappings of ordinary life: at floorboards and molding, bricks and tiles, ivy climbing a wall.

The Secret World of Arrietty looks closely at these things because its heroine Arrietty, a Borrower, is only about four inches tall. Her “secret world” is in the hidden spaces under floorboards and within walls, but the ordinary spaces of the house are no less magical.

I have no prior history with the Borrowers, created in the 1950s by children’s author Mary Norton for a series of popular books and depicted in a number of small-screen adaptations and a well-received 1997 big-screen film. (As a child I read The Littles books, a younger-skewing American series by John Peterson that shared the premise of little people living in the secret spaces of big people’s homes.)

From a brief perusal of Norton’s first Borrowers book, it seems The Secret World of Arrietty, um, borrows themes and plot points, including the names of the Borrower family — young Arrietty and her parents, level-headed Pod and nervous Homily — but charts its own plot in its own setting, present-day Japan rather than Victorian England.

In some ways, Arrietty echoes Miyazaki’s great classic My Neighbor Totoro. Both films begin with young protagonists (in Totoro there are two young sisters; here, it’s a boy named Shawn) arriving at an unfamiliar house in the country and discovering the strange, elusive beings who live there. The older generation pass on memories and lore regarding the mysterious creatures, but it’s generally the young who see them. Oh, and in both films a character suffers from a serious, potentially life-threatening condition, a situation that is matter-of-factly handled and obliquely rather than directly resolved in the end. In this case, it is Shawn, who has come to his great-aunt’s house in the country to rest for his precarious health.

What is unique to Arrietty is that it shows us both perspectives: the human and the other. Our first sight of Arrietty (voiced in the American dub by Bridgit Mendler) is through the eyes of the boy, who catches a fleeting glimpse of a tiny female figure vanishing in the grass. But we also see the “Beans” (or human beings) and their world from the Borrowers’ point of view. In a late scene, as Arrietty rides on Shawn’s shoulder, the camera cuts between the two frames of reference: We see Shawn (David Henrie) walking normally across the room with a tiny girl on his shoulder, and then we see Arrietty hurtling along like the young hero of The Iron Giant on the shoulder of his colossal friend.

Arrietty is a winsome protagonist: spirited, coltish, wide-eyed, eager to take up the family trade. With her hair pulled back in a tiny butterfly clip and a found pin at her side like a sword, she feels ready for anything — a soul sister to the titular heroine of Kiki’s Delivery Service. It must be acknowledged, though, that where Kiki inhabited a world full of engaging personalities, Arrietty is the most personable character in her film. Her supporting cast is colorful, but not as well-developed as in most of Miyazaki’s films. That, and a sometimes over-insistent score, are about the extent of the film’s weaknesses.

Arrietty’s father Pod (Will Arnett), quite unlike the portly, bowler-wearing figure of the books, is a strong, silent action hero and jack-of-all-trades — MacGyver crossed with Pa from the Little House books, though without Pa’s humorous, playful side. The first night he takes Arrietty borrowing with him we see his skills through her shining eyes. “Pa, you are great!” she whispers. Later, though Arrietty has made a serious slip, Pod praises her: “I am very proud of you. A lesser Borrower would have panicked and run away.” It’s a rare father-daughter dynamic in a family film, and a welcome one.

The mother, Homily (Amy Poehler), is a somewhat comic, excitable figure, worrying constantly about her husband and daughter (at one point even briefly praying for them). All in all, it’s a lovely family — a point brought home by Shawn’s wistful comment to Arrietty: “So, you have a family. That must be nice.” Shawn explains that his own parents, whom we learn are divorced, are “both very busy with their work.” It’s a nice balance between acknowledging the modern reality of broken families and depicting how things are meant to be.

The heart of the film’s power is its visualization of how the Borrowers live. The whole movie is one imaginative inspiration after another: A row of nails make a vertiginous bridge; a series of staples, a fixed ladder. In almost every scene there is a new revelation. Further praise along this line would turn into a catalogue of invention that would spoil the reader’s discovery of the film.

One of the niftiest aspects of the Borrowers’ scaled-down lives involves the things that don’t scale: When they pour tea from a tiny teapot, a giant drop plops in the cup, and the grains of sugar in the sugar bowl are like small nuts. Likewise, when Homily does the cooking, it’s on a flame the size of a pilot light. (This is where live-action movies about tiny people often stumble: In Honey, I Shrunk the Kids, when a boy falls into a bowl of Cheerios, the swimming pool–sized splash gives it away.)

With neither the visual nor plot-level weirdness of the likes of Ponyo and Spirited Away, The Secret World of Arrietty is one of the most straightforward, accessible Ghibli films ever made. In Japan, Ghibli films regularly top the box office, and Arrietty was the highest-grossing film of 2010. (Spirited Away surpassed James Cameron’s Titanic to become the top-grossing film in Japan of all time.) In America, alas, Ghibli films have historically opened quietly to small audiences of art-house and animation aficionados and a narrow slice of the family audience.

Even John Lasseter and the might of Disney marketing have not so far been able to persuade the wider American audience that Ghibli’s lush, humane films are more deserving of attention than Hollywood trash like The Chipmunks and The Smurfs. The fault is not with our children. I can’t think that there is an 8-year-old in the world who would not be entranced by The Secret World of Arrietty, unless his or her imagination has been crushed by soulless feature-length commercials for toys. For that matter, the same goes for anyone who remembers being eight years old.

Decades ago, as a young art student, I learned that no matter how many times you’ve seen something, you don’t really know what it looks like until you try to draw it. Watch The Secret World of Arrietty with your eyes open, and witness the secret world in which we all live revealed. 

Steven Greydanus is the Register film critic.


Content Advisory: A couple of mildly frightening moments. Fine family viewing.

 

Filed under family films, movie reviews, secret world of arrietty, studio ghibli

Comments

Post a Comment

In America, alas, Ghibli films have historically opened quietly to small audiences of art house and animation aficionados and a narrow slice of the family audience.

 
This is the main reason I’ve seen so few, and it bothers me. I don’t mind trekking down to an art cinema in another city for The Tree of Life or Of Gods and Men. This is different. Seeing a movie like this - or taking kids to see it, which can become a formidable undertaking if you have to factor in two hours of driving time - should be easy and natural.

FWIW, Pachyderminator, Disney is hoping The Secret World of Arrietty will be the breakthrough film for American audiences they’ve been hoping for.
 
It’s their best chance yet: Not only is it Ghibli at their most accessible, but the source material, The Borrowers, is a familiar property. (By contrast, Diana Wynn Jones’s Howl’s Moving Castle was less well-known—and Miyazaki’s take on it was full of his typical weirdness, which is an acquired taste.)
 
So, you might find Arrietty in a theater near you.

“The Secret World of Arrietty just might change the way you look at the world around you — right around you. A wide-eyed sense of discovery and revelation permeates the film, and what it reveals is ... the mystery and wonder of an ordinary home.”

Every time I watch a Ghibli film I can’t help feeling sorry that GK Chesterton, JRR Tolkien, and CS Lewis aren’t still around to enjoy them.

SDG: That’s great news, thanks!

I remember reading the Borrowers books when I was 7 or 8 and loving them. I can barely remember the plot, but that wonderful sense of invention you mentioned strongly affected me. If Arrietty can evoke those emotions in me again this movie will certainly be worth the ticket price. And if it does not, it’s not like it would be a betrayal of my childhood or anything.
HOWEVER, If Disney EVER messes up Redwall… that I will not stand for.

I also remember reading “The Littles” while growing up, and I’ve seen every Studio Ghibli film that’s been dubbed into English, but the previews for Arrietty didn’t do much to sell it beyond “Oh, look! It’s Amy Poehler!”


So this review is very encouraging and I’ll definitely try to find it playing locally. Feel the Miyazaki love!

My sister and I loved the books, and we love Studio Ghibli, so we’ve been looking forward to this movie for some time. I’m so pleased to see a good review. It looks beautiful.

GKids is doing a Ghibli retrospective, a rare opportunity to see Miyazaki and Takahata on real cinema: currently in Boston now (february), to follow tentatively: Toronto (March) Austin (March) DC (April-May) Seattle (June) San Francisco (July)
http://www.mfa.org/programs/series/castles-sky-miyazaki-takahata-and-masters-studio-ghibli

Arriety is opening in 1300 theaters on Friday—which I believe is far above any other Ghibli/Miyazaki opening before. I can’t wait to see it.

Mark Moring: Thanks for that! I’m going to be taking my whole family to see it, probably this weekend—and we’ll probably bring friends and/or family too.

Saw it about four hours ago. Loved it. Artistically well done, and a light story that plumps fluff within your heart. Everyone in our theatre were devoted with concentration as they watched. Many stayed until the ending credits were done.

Great film.

Got out of this earlier this evening. Yes, it’s playing widely; the 550pm Friday show at the megaplex looked about half-full. It seemed to go over well; kids were silent except for occasional spurts of joy and “yeah” at the right moments near the end.

This means less coming from me than it would from Steve, but ARRIETTY is my favorite Ghibli so far. I knew it was going to be special during a scene of Arrietty with ... a flea. There’s nothing quite as individual as the shape-shifting ghost-cat or That Other Creature in TOTORO, but The Crow comes close. It’s gentle and exciting, and as realistic as a film about 6-inch people can be. It has both a genuine sense of wonder and a “strangeness” of a familiar world having been defamiliarized.

The only things I would say against Steve’s review is that (1) the film makes some significant changes, but the plot architecture and major points are the same as the first novel, and (2) the score isn’t merely too insistent (though it is) but that it’s at times downright “wrong.” I wanted to stuff popcorn in my ears every time that winsome, Sarah McLachlan for Tweens song came up, even at one moment (involving The Evil Servant) where the image and plot point is threatening and “doom music” (if any) would have been called for.

But no movie with Carol Burnett voice-acting anger is not awesome.

I guess “say against” is probably a bit strong since neither point I’m making exactly “rebuts” anything Steve says. In the Washington tradition, I would ask the speaker’s permission to revise and extend that phrase to “the only way I would revise and extend Steve’s review ...”

Just returned from a second helping of Arrietty at the theater with Suz and the kids, plus another family from church that also has six kids—16 of us in all. Everyone enjoyed it, most of us loved it. Painful to have to suffer first through trailers for Hollywood dreck like The Lorax and the latest Madagascar sequel. It’s like “Here’s the poison, and now here’s the antidote.”

What did you think, based on the trailer (I assume you saw the same set I did), about how Pixar’s BRAVE looks. I for one am not looking forward to it (and I was looking forward to CARS 2).

Hollywood dreck like The Lorax…

 
I told you so, remember?

Victor Morton: First, I’m keeping my mind wide open, bearing in mind that nearly all Pixar trailers to date have failed to capture what was special about their movies. Second, I think the Brave trailers smell strongly of DreamWorks. Partly it’s the accents: After three Shrek films AND How to Train Your Dragon, DreamWorks has just staked out the Scottish burr as their territory. Partly it’s easy, low humor like the “feast your eyes” kilt joke and the musclebound mook standing in front of the scrawny kid. Buuuut I’m keeping my eyes open.
   
Pachyderminator: You weren’t wrong. Ai yi yi yi yi yi yi… And Despicable Me was such a cute little film. Little Illumination didn’t take long to fritter away the good will they earned on that, did they?

I was actually hoping you would say, “Yes, yes, you’re very smart, now shut up.”

The trailer for BRAVE better be misleading—it just makes the film look like MULAN garnished with haggis.

So wit ah wahnt tae no—whyde naebdy at Pixurr come and knock me up tae dae a bit in their wee pikchur ...

Pachyderminator: What I should have said is: “Thank you so much for bringing up such a painful subject. While you’re at it, why don’t you give me a nice paper cut and pour lemon juice on it?”
 
In that connection: Victor Morton: Ouch. It’s painful because it’s true.

Behold! Sixy-second reviews of The Secret World of Arrietty, John Carter, The Lorax and Good Deeds!

Post a Comment

By submitting this form, you give The National Catholic Register permission to publish this comment. Comments will be published at our discretion, and may be edited for clarity and length. For best formatting, please limit your response to one paragraph and don't hit "enter" to force line breaks.

Name:

Email:

Write your comment:

Please enter the word you see in the image below:

     

Notify me of follow-up comments.