Print Article | Email Article | Write To Us

Daily News

SDG Reviews 'Happy Feet Two' (3905)

Darkness falls on Antarctica: The dancing-penguin sequel is the grimmest animated film in years, a global-warming disaster movie rife with problematic themes.

11/21/2011 Comments (8)

Little ones are “tougher than we think,” a penguin remarks in Happy Feet Two, and you can tell director George Miller believes it. The animated sequel pulls few punches: It’s overshadowed by more darkness, menace, heartache and anxiety than any talking-animal picture I can think of since, well, Miller’s last family-film sequel, the execrable Babe: Pig in the City. Neither the classic Babe nor the original Happy Feet contained any hint of the darkness of the sequels. Apparently Miller’s strategy is to soften kids up first, then drop the bomb.

Not that Happy Feet Two is a horror show equivalent to the movie I like to call Babe: With a Vengeance, where the heartache was almost uninterrupted from beginning to end. Happy Feet Two does offer moments of comfort, humor and redemption. In its penguin protagonist, now a father with a chick of his own, the sequel has one of the most positive animated father figures in recent memory, along with Pixar’s Marlin from Finding Nemo and Bob Parr from The Incredibles. It’s also worth noting that the animation is far more spectacular this time around. Still, the dominant mood is too grim. It’s nothing I would consider for my own children.

The Oscar-winning original Happy Feet, about an Emperor penguin named Mumble (voiced by Elijah Wood) whose tuneful colony was slow to accept his tap-dancing ways, is fondly remembered by many for its singing and dancing penguins. I think it highly overrated, a lumpy coming-of-age tale soured by inappropriately racy lyrics, explicitly anti-religious/authority/tradition themes, and a coy homosexual subtext. (No, I’m not kidding.)

For what it’s worth, none of these caveats is quite as much of an issue in the sequel. The soundtrack is, if anything, more obnoxious this time around (instead of Prince, Boyz II Men and Elvis, we get Justin Timberlake, Pink and Wham), but at least the filmmakers have the minimal sense to sanitize the lyrics — for instance: “Get your fluffy on” instead of “Get your sexy on.” (Compare that to lines like “I just need your body, baby, from dusk till dawn” in the original.)

Penguin religion is less prominent, although there’s a new false prophet named Sven (Hank Azaria) who is celebrated by the phony guru Lovelace (Robin Williams) from the original. And while there’s some gay-themed humor in a subplot involving a pair of krill, it’s not a key subtext this time.

What Happy Feet Two ramps up is the ecological theme. In the original, human overfishing of Antarctic waters was starving the penguins. Here, it’s global-warming apocalyticism. Ominously crumbling, shifting, melting ice and snow is an ever-present danger; shoots of green crop up in new locales; water pools on the ice, and tsunami-like waves buffet the frozen coast; helpless animals are stranded on shrinking icebergs, etc.

The main plot centers on shifting ice trapping the Emperor colony in a sort of ice valley where, cut off from the sea, they are in danger of starving. As a central conflict, this predictably restricts the dramatic possibilities as much as it does the penguins’ movements. There will be escape attempts and rescue attempts that fail, and then, finally, in the end, one will succeed. In the meantime, there’s a lot of penguins standing around while the plot spins its wheels in the snow.

Mumble’s mate Gloria (recast as Pink after the original actress, Brittany Murphy, died last year) is trapped with the colony, while Mumble and their young chick, Erik (Ava Acres), are on the outside looking in. Parent-child separation trauma is a major theme, starting with an aggressive elephant seal (Richard Carter) who takes a nasty fall into a seemingly bottomless crevasse while his adorable round-eyed pups look on in horror. Mumble sets that problem straight, but it takes the whole movie to rescue the stranded penguins.

Breaking up the monotony of the main plot, the film intermittently cuts to the largely unrelated comic adventures of Will the Krill and his sidekick, Bill (Brad Pitt and Matt Damon). Will and Bill’s dialogue is strikingly rife with philosophical allusiveness, starting with Will’s initial musings about what lies beyond the world they know, the swarm. “More swarm?” Bill suggests. But Will is convinced that everything has an end (“Look at my tail — that’s where I end”) and is determined to pursue the possibility of freedom. “There is no ‘free,’ Will!” Bill shouts. (Read it again if you missed it.)

By the end, Bill is speculating that perhaps dancing serves “as a temporary release from the existential terrors of existence.” (Another character, in what is admittedly a pretty great moment, sings, “Nothing makes sense in this world! It’s all just a big pile of crazy! And the kings are all fools!” I’m seldom one to fault a family film for presenting challenging ideas, but this is the kind of thing you want context on — context the film doesn’t provide.)

Horrified to find that his world is lunch for large predators, Will strikes out on his own, determined to “move up the food chain.” Repeatedly attempting to dissuade Will from his quixotic quest, Bill suggests, “We can start our own little swarm!” When Will objects that they’re both male, Bill responds, “We’ll adopt! Plenty of krill would count themselves lucky to have me as a partner! I’m a heck of a wingman!”

Before long, Bill’s serenading Will (“Wake Me Up Before You Go-Go” and “Never Gonna Give You Up”), and Will finally gives in, warning, “But no hanky-panky!” This is pretty overt, though it’s basically limited to a few lines between supporting characters, where the first film centered on the conflict between an intolerant society and the “different” protagonist with his nonconformist impulses.

Echoing the absurdity of Will’s quest to become a predator, Sven, billed as a flying penguin, proclaims a gospel akin to The Secret: “If you want it, you must will it; if you will it, it will be yours!” Many penguins, including Mumble’s chick Erik, are swayed by “SvenThink”; Erik even believes that he may actually be able to fly, though his aspirations are destined to come crashing to earth. (Many viewers will immediately recognize Sven as a puffin poser. Here’s a theme parents who wind up watching Happy Feet Two with their kids might highlight: Creatures can’t be something contrary to their nature; God didn’t make krill to be predators, or penguins to fly.)

Erik, like his father before him, struggles to find his place in the world, and Mumble struggles to be a more supportive father than his own papa, Memphis, was. Despite some initial awkwardness, Erik ultimately declares Mumble his hero, and his striking tribute to his dad is one of the film’s most vivid grace notes as well as its best musical moment. On the other hand, Happy Feet Two also subjects us to the depressing spectacle of penguin chicks rapping and striking hip-hop poses. This is the scourge of modern animated family fare, from The Smurfs to Alvin & the Chipmunks. Please make it stop.

What is up with the gratuitously icky moment in which Sven puts some moves on Mumble’s mate Gloria? Apparently he singles her out just to lord it over Mumble, though this is his only moment of such malice. (Sven mostly comes off as pathetically needy and unscrupulous in pursuing celebrity, but still kindly and even heroically helpful to the Emperors in their hour of need.) As part of a group effort to bring food to the trapped penguins, Sven personally brings a fish to Gloria and slyly passes it to her beak to beak; there’s even some tongue contact. This bizarre moment connects to nothing else in the film.

For some reason, even though he’s now a father, Mumble still looks like an overgrown adolescent chick, with downy gray feathers, while all the other adults, including Gloria, have sleek black-and-white feathers. Is this a side effect of being dropped on the ice as an egg by his father in the beginning of the first film? Is Mumble really the way he is because his father dropped the ball? There’s a politically incorrect angle on Happy Feet‘s parable of difference.

Register film critic Steven D. Greydanus blogs at NCRegister.com.

Content Advisory: Some intense menace and action; mildly suggestive content and innuendo, including brief homosexual-themed humor; stressful family situations. Not for younger kids.

 

Filed under animation, dreamworks, family films, happy feet, movies, reviews

Comments

Post a Comment

...shoots of green crop up in new locales…

 
Ha! It sounds like a sort of twisted antarctic Wall-E. Bambi comes to mind as well. Is this the first time melting snow and growing plants have been a bad thing in a children’s movie? (Not that there’s anything wrong with that - this is Antarctica, after all - but it’s an interesting reversal of what seems a pretty universal symbol of life and hope.)
 

In the meantime, there’s a lot of penguins standing around while the plot spins its wheels in the snow.

 
This is an amusing sentence. It’s not the first time you’ve made effective use of the phrase “stand around”. I’m also thinking of this sentence from your review of The Last Temptation of Christ: “John’s ministry in the wilderness resembles a hysterical-ecstatic Pentecostal revival meeting, with John striding maniacally about spouting dark Old Testament apocalyptic (nothing of his actual themes of repentance or the kingdom of heaven), while people gibber and shake and inexplicably stand around naked.”
 

Before long, Bill’s serenading Will (“Wake Me Up Before You Go-Go” and “Never Gonna Give You Up”)...

 
Wait, do you mean this movie rickrolls the audience? That’s awesome.
 
By the way, does Will and Bill’s quixotic quest to essentially be something other than krill definitely fail? If so, that almost sounds like the film, in spite of itself, carries a warning against gay adoption.

“Ha! It sounds like a sort of twisted antarctic Wall-E. Bambi comes to mind as well. Is this the first time melting snow and growing plants have been a bad thing in a children’s movie?”

 
Nice observation. Happy Feet Two certainly isn’t the first global warming cautionary family film—for example, Arctic Tale covers a lot of the same ground in a pseudo-documentary format, and even more stridently, if you can believe that—but I don’t remember the ominous green plant bit in that movie.
 

“This is an amusing sentence. It’s not the first time you’ve made effective use of the phrase “stand around”. I’m also thinking of this sentence from your review of The Last Temptation of Christ:”

 
I’m flattered and flabbergasted that you made this connection. You inspired me to Google my own site for the phrase “standing around,” and I discovered that this isn’t the first time that penguins are “standing around” in one of my reviews: In March of the Penguins, I reported, “penguin parents to do a lot of standing around with an egg or a chick perched on their feet, tucked under warm abdominal plumage.” Since I have used “standing around” only seven times in over 11 years (plus one usage of “stand around” other than the one you noted), what are the odds?
 
Anyway, while I enjoyed noting some of the ways I used this phrase, particularly reviewing Deathly Hallows: Part 1 and Iron Man 2, I’m certainly going to be aware of it the next time I reach for that phrase.
 

“Wait, do you mean this movie rickrolls the audience? That’s awesome.”

 
And now I have learned a new word. Like quotations from The Princess Bride such as “Khello. My name is Inigo Montoya. You killed my father. Prepare to die,” the verb “rickroll” seems too specific to ever be useful in a general context, but I admit it would have been useful in this review.
 

“By the way, does Will and Bill’s quixotic quest to essentially be something other than krill definitely fail? If so, that almost sounds like the film, in spite of itself, carries a warning against gay adoption.”

 
That was the point of the implicit natural law argument I noted about God not making krill to be predators or penguins to fly. There is an element of that in the film. Still, in the end, Will’s journey is at least a moral victory. He may not become a predator himself, but he still manages to transform the status quo.

AAAAAHHHHH! you’re kidding me! in a ‘KID’S’ movie!?!

On the other hand, Happy Feet Two also subjects us to the depressing spectacle of penguin chicks rapping and striking hip-hop poses. This is the scourge of modern animated family fare, from The Smurfs to Alvin & the Chipmunks. Please make it stop.

Okay, that’s going into my Good Quotes file.
   
It’s nice that even a horrible film can be a source of entertainment, at least indirectly, by way of these reviews. On the other hand, what does it say about me that I derive pleasure from someone else pointing out how bad something is? Hmm…

SDG,

I am shocked—shocked, I tell you!—that you did not know the meaning of the term “rickroll”.  What Internet rock have you been hiding under?  :)

I recently saw the trailer for HF2 and all kinds of alarm bells went off.  I noticed that it and the other preview I saw, for the new chipmunks movie, rely very heavily on promoting recent (say, gaga) or well known pop music (say, Abba) e.g. the cartoon characters do suggestive group line dancing exactly as one would see a gaga or beyonce doing with their backup dancers.  The music and the dancing itself common, loud, hackneyed and is very suggestive, lots of hips, etc.  It looks like the dance of the harem, basically, re-packaged into cartoon characters, whether they are female or not.  Film supports music, music supports films.  One giant pathology that is injected into very young children’s minds.  And with these films, we aren’t talking pre-teen young, we are talking, get that gaga tune into their heads at 5 years old.  By the time she is 13 she will be agreeing with all gaga’s opinions.

Aside from that, the general message of these movies is always self-reliance, self-actualization.  No transcendence in the hero other than realizing the spirit of man (disguised in animal form) within him.  No higher power at all, or, even if one is alluded to, it is merely a flowering of the character’s own ego.

Pure sludge.

Thanks for the heads-up.  So many of the new movies are so questionable, just the cases scare you off.  I don’t buy hardly any new movies for the children because the spirit is just not innocent like the old Walt Disneys.  I almost hate even going into the video store because of the big posters they put up and IN YOUR FACE as though they are neat, are so distasteful such as “Lil Fockers” and some other one, don’t remember the name but it had a woman’s legs sticking up above a desk and it said “Eat Me.”  This world better pull its head out of it’s armpit because this is distasteful and devoid of any good moral sense, common sense, or anything else.  Disheartening and I am only in my 40’s.

Not only are the contents in this movie not recommended for children of a certain age group.. but people should be boycotting this type of movie!
It is defying that so many people think its ok for thier children, even at the age of 20 or older can manage to seperate the good and bad. These things sit in the subconcious of all human beings.
Disney can’t even be considered to be wholesome at any point. Disney is known to be one of the biggest supporters of Planned Parenthood. For those that do not know who they are: They are a corporation that claims to help women in times of crisis pregnancies, but do the exact opposite. Once women go in, they are pressured to have abortions.
There are many people, young and old, that have been not been exposed to this. Planned parenthood has deceived so many.
If any of you are curious about where I have come up with this information feel free to e-mail me at .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)

God Bless You All

Post a Comment

By submitting this form, you give The National Catholic Register permission to publish this comment. Comments will be published at our discretion, and may be edited for clarity and length. For best formatting, please limit your response to one paragraph and don't hit "enter" to force line breaks.

Name:

Email:

Write your comment:

Please enter the word you see in the image below:

     

Notify me of follow-up comments.