Print Article | Email Article | Write To Us

Daily News

Real Religion Is Faith Lived (3356)

March 25 issue column: The problem is not religion, but false religion. Real religion is a good thing because it consists precisely of doing those works of charity Jesus exemplifies.

03/23/2012 Comments (6)
Shutterstock

– Shutterstock

“I’m not religious! I just love the Lord!” It’s one of those sayings I heard repeated with an almost liturgical regularity back in the warm and simple days when I was an evangelical. It went without saying that “religion” was bad. What also went without saying was what, exactly, religion was. So, what do people seem to mean by “religion”? Basically, a cold, artificial thing that blocks us from the direct, unmediated ecstasy of access to God without a clutter of priests, complicated rites, baffling theology understandable only to professionals, and various “magic words” and symbols that mainly function to cut us off from “the simple Gospel of Jesus.”

What does Scripture say about religion? Actually, not much — and all of it good. James, says, “If anyone thinks he is religious and does not bridle his tongue but deceives his heart, this man’s religion is vain. Religion that is pure and undefiled before God and the Father is this: to visit orphans and widows in their affliction and to keep oneself unstained from the world” (James 1:26-27).

In other words, the problem is not religion, but false religion. Real religion is a good thing because it consists precisely of doing those works of charity Jesus exemplifies. Pitting Jesus against religion is like smashing a great violinist’s instrument while demanding purely spiritual “music.”

Paul says that women should adorn themselves with “good deeds, as befits women who profess religion” (1 Timothy 2:10). Once again, religion is a good thing, embodied in good deeds. Paul also tells Timothy, “Great indeed, we confess, is the mystery of our religion: He was manifested in the flesh, vindicated in the Spirit, seen by angels, preached among the nations, believed on in the world, taken up in glory” (1 Timothy 3:16). Here “religion” simply refers to the content of the Gospel, which is Jesus. It is the insistence that Jesus did not remain a disembodied spirit, but became flesh.

Paul further says, “If a widow has children or grandchildren, let them first learn their religious duty to their own family and make some return to their parents; for this is acceptable in the sight of God” (1 Timothy 5:4). In other words, just as Jesus is the Word made flesh, so our faith must likewise be made flesh. A faith that remains a mere spiritual idea or concept but is not lived out in actual, concrete, practical acts of love is dead. And a faith that is practiced enfleshes itself in acts of charity; it is, precisely, a religion, since the word derives from “religio” and means a “respect for what is sacred.” The bonds of love and family are sacred because God is love and the creator of the family. Trying to be “spiritual” while hating your family or your neighbor is nonsense since, as John says, “He who does not love his brother, whom he has seen, cannot love God, whom he has not seen (1 John 4:20).

This is why Paul warns Timothy, not against religion (which is simply “faith made flesh”), but against false religion (which is “faithlessness made flesh”), saying, “But understand this, that in the last days there will come times of stress. For men will be lovers of self, lovers of money, proud, arrogant, abusive, disobedient to their parents, ungrateful, unholy, inhuman, implacable, slanderers, profligates, fierce, haters of good, treacherous, reckless, swollen with conceit, lovers of pleasure rather than lovers of God, holding the form of religion but denying the power of it. Avoid such people” (2 Timothy 3:1-5). Having the form of a religion while denying the power of it (namely the power of the Holy Spirit) is like having a dead body without its spirit. It looks just like the true and living thing, but it’s dead.

Mark Shea blogs at NCRegister.com.


 

Filed under faith, faith in action, following christ, religion

Comments

Post a Comment

“If anyone thinks he is religious and does not bridle his tongue but deceives his heart, this man’s religion is vain. Religion that is pure and undefiled before God and the Father is this: to visit orphans and widows in their affliction and to keep oneself unstained from the world” (James 1:26-27).


Haha, this is part of the reason I like James, the other part is because that Luther HATED him! He talks about religion that can be holy, which would irk Protestants of today, and devotes half a chapter to explaining why Faith without works is dead(James 2:14-26), which is one of the most fondational teachings of nearly all Protestentisim called “Sola Fide”.

The “I’m-not-religious-but, etc” mantra is so crude and naive that it is really difficult to choose one of its thousands of errors to begin its critique. St. Augustine of Hippo has done a very good job of explaining why there is no salvation outside the Church but the fallen human nature has not improved much in the 1,600 years after his times. The people who profess this nonsense will eventually find out how wrong they were but it will be too late…

The statement that, “I’m not religious! I just love the Lord!” also comes off as self-congratulatory.

“The only science that gives purpose to every other science is the science of religion — the science of our happy relationship with, and our providential dependence on God and our neighbor.”
  Father Solanus Casey

Nice reflection.
Note also James’s comment:  Don’t say to another “Keep warm and well fed.” but fail to meet his needs when you know that he is hungry and/or cold.
From Jesus’s stories, two Gospel accounts specify that we are to be aware of and meet the needs of our neighbor:  Luke’s account (Ch. 16: 19-31) of the rich man and Lazarus; and Matthew’s account (Ch 25: 31-46) of the Last Judgment.
Teapot562

“What does Scripture say about religion? Actually, not much — and all of it good.”

Um…I must be reading different scripture.

You seem not to be including the Old Testament, since religion proper plays a huge part in the narrative, due in no small part to the contributions of the Priestly writers. Since you leave it out I will, too.

But in the New Testament, over and over again Jesus comments in some way upon the religion as practiced by the scribes and pharisees (the leaders of the religion), and he is not particularly kind about them.

How about this from Matthew 23:  “The scribes and the Pharisees sit on Moses’ seat, so practice and observe whatever they tell you—but not what they do. For they preach, but do not practice. They tie up heavy burdens, hard to bear, and lay them on people’s shoulders, but they themselves are not willing to move them with their finger. They do all their deeds to be seen by others. For they make their phylacteries broad and their fringes long, ...”

I agree with you that scripture does not condemn religion, nor should we ever pit Jesus against religion.  But one cannot really discuss this subject without also pointing out that Jesus spent a big chunk of time condemning the scribes and the pharisees for their religious practices and leadership.  This, by necessity, means that not everything said about religion is good, since those scribes and pharisees are the leaders of this religion.  One cannot just arbitrarily remove religious leadership from the religion equation.  If one does, it makes it too easy to overlook those same hypocritical pharisaical tendencies that exist in religion today which Jesus deplored.

Post a Comment

By submitting this form, you give The National Catholic Register permission to publish this comment. Comments will be published at our discretion, and may be edited for clarity and length. For best formatting, please limit your response to one paragraph and don't hit "enter" to force line breaks.

Name:

Email:

Write your comment:

Please enter the word you see in the image below:

     

Notify me of follow-up comments.