Print Article | Email Article | Write To Us

Daily News

Obama Says Same-Sex ‘Marriage’ Necessary for National Progress (2622)

In his second inaugural address, the president promoted the controversial issue as being equivalent to the women’s suffrage and civil-rights movements.

01/22/2013 Comments (10)
Scott Andrews-Pool/Getty Images

President Barack Obama waves after his speech at the ceremonial swearing-in during the 57th Presidential Inauguration Jan. 21 on the West Front of the U.S. Capitol in Washington.

– Scott Andrews-Pool/Getty Images

WASHINGTON — As he entered his second term as U.S. president, Barack Obama stressed the need to modernize American values through changes such as a redefinition of marriage.

The American journey “is not complete,” Obama said on Jan. 21, until homosexual individuals have their unions “treated like anyone else under the law.”

He argued that same-sex “marriage” is necessary for equality, “for, if we are truly created equal, then surely the love we commit to one another must be equal as well.”

In his second inaugural address, the president promoted same-sex “marriage” as a basic civil right, such as those that women and black people fought for throughout history.

Obama discussed the need to “defend our people and uphold our values” while moving forward on a “never-ending journey” of progress.

Americans have always been united by “our allegiance to an idea,” he said, but “we have always understood that when times change so must we.”

Citing assertions by the Declaration of Independence that all men are “endowed by their Creator” with the rights of “Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness,” Obama stressed the need “to bridge the meaning of those words with the realities of our time.”

While acknowledging that “freedom is a gift from God,” he added that fidelity to our founding documents “does not mean we will all define liberty in exactly the same way.”

The president pointed to the progress that the nation has made in the areas of slavery, infrastructure and education. To continue in this progress, he said, America must promote cultural values such as “care for the vulnerable” and an acceptance of homosexual “rights.”

He also emphasized the need for cooperation, particularly on subjects such as the struggling economy and immigration reform.

Absent from Obama’s speech — delivered just one day before the 40th anniversary of Roe v. Wade — was any mention of abortion. Also missing was any reference to the controversial contraception mandate that has attracted lawsuits from more than 100 plaintiffs across the country.

Instead, the president focused on the need to constantly advance “those principles that our common creed describes: tolerance and opportunity; human dignity and justice.”

He praised the “star” of equality that guided the American forebearers at “Seneca Falls and Selma and Stonewall,” equating the 1969 homosexual-advocacy riots in New York to the historic milestones in the movements for women’s suffrage and civil rights.

Obama’s support of same-sex “marriage” was hailed by homosexual-activist groups last May when he became the first sitting president to endorse such unions.

Controversy over the president’s stance on marriage was recently rekindled when the Christian pastor originally picked to deliver the inaugural benediction resigned from the post amid heavy criticism for a sermon he delivered in the 1990s describing homosexuality as a sin.

In his inaugural speech, Obama also emphasized the importance of protecting the most vulnerable in society.

Arguing that “every citizen deserves a basic measure of security and dignity,” he stated that even the poorest of Americans should be secure, knowing that they are free and “equal, not just in the eyes of God, but also in our own.”

In addition, he highlighted America’s obligations “to all posterity,” ensuring, among other things, that children “know that they are cared for and cherished and always safe from harm.”

Returning to the nation’s founding documents, Obama urged that their words be taken seriously.

The task of our generation, he said, is “to make these words, these rights, these values — of life, and liberty and the pursuit of happiness — real for every American.”

 

Filed under abortion, civil rights, freedom vs. license, president barack obama, same-sex 'marriage'

Comments

Post a Comment

Here’s what we get when conservatives argue & bicker amongst themselves & can’t unite behind a strong candidate…

He said, “to all posterity,  that children know that they are cared for and cherished and always safe from harm.” If the children, in the wombs of their mothers, could hear those words and speak, they would say, “Liar!” What about us? Why do you not include us in your claim that ALL children should know that they are cared for, cherished and always kept from harm.

If he is not willing to protect children in the womb of their mothers, where the only defense can be only of ours, then he will not be able to protect any other children.
We cannot protect people who have a chance to defend themselves if we cannot protect those who are defenseless.
That all talk is garbage based on naivite or is outward evil. Not mine role to judge, though. I can only ask God to make me a saint, and then I will be able to open my mouth and speak in His name more than I can do now - able to speak what He told me though His Church.

May Hod have mercy on his soul and all his companions

God bless President Obama!  An advocate for the downtrodden, a true patriot who earned his way, unlike his corporate clone rich Mormon opponent in the recent election.  What a courageous stand he took as he understood how gay people have been treated.  Those who claim to support civil marriage should support same-sex marriage as the President does.

What Obama is saying in his advocacy for same sex marriage is that he feels the Bible is no longer applicable to our changing times. I guess he doesn’t believe the passages that say God is the same yesterday, today and tomorrow or the Scriptures in Leviticus and Romans among several other Biblical verses that clearly state that two people of the same sex lying together is an abomination in God’s eyes and will be judged accordingly. So will abortion on demand and the murder of an innocent fetus with its accompanying soul. If God judged Sodom and Gomorrah then He is going to judge the United States of America as Jonathan Cahn so eloquently stated in his best-seller, “The Harbinger.”

You are so right Michael! Its ashamed they are moving in this direction.

Equal perhaps, but, definitely separate because marriage is inherently distinctively between a man and woman requiring no second meaning. 

As with the question of equality for women in sports, and earlier with the American Negro, the separate but equal doctrine may be the sole answer to the question of homosexual unions and, thereby, avoid its fraudulent label as a marriage.

Equal perhaps, but, definitely separate because marriage is inherently distinctively between a man and woman requiring no second meaning.  As with the question of equality for women in sports, and earlier with the American Negro, the separate but equal doctrine may be the sole answer to the question of homosexual unions and, thereby, avoid its fraudulent label or misclassification as a marriage.

We must pray for all men, the kings and all that are in authority just as it says I’m 1 Timothy 2:1-4. The devil is in high places and we must intercede for those that are in power. Pray the devil out of them. Read the above scripture and also r read II Thessalonians 3:1-2, proverbs 21:1 to get a better understanding of what’sGod is required of us. If we fail as people of God to pray for them then we fail also and we fail God. Be blessed in The Lord and don’t forget to pray!

Post a Comment

By submitting this form, you give The National Catholic Register permission to publish this comment. Comments will be published at our discretion, and may be edited for clarity and length. For best formatting, please limit your response to one paragraph and don't hit "enter" to force line breaks.

The time period for commenting on this article has expired.