Print Article | Email Article | Write To Us

Daily News

How to Appeal to the Catholic Voter (1311)

The impact and infuence of the faithful on America's elections.

06/21/2011 Comments (2)
Shutterstock

– Shutterstock

NEW ORLEANS (CNA) — While Gov. Haley Barbour has told the Southern Republican Leadership Conference that primary voters should not expect a “perfect candidate” or demand “purity,” commentator Deal Hudson says Republicans must have a “pro-life and pro-marriage” nominee to attract Catholic voters.

“It’s not a matter of demanding ‘purity’ from a candidate, but, rather, a matter of expecting principle and prudence. It’s a matter of principle because the Catholic Church teaches, and most Americans agree, that unborn life should be protected and that marriage is between a man and a woman,” Hudson said.

Selecting such a nominee is also a matter of “political prudence” because a nominee who is not pro-life and pro-marriage will not be able to “ignite the Catholics, evangelicals and other social conservatives at the grassroots whose commitment and passion will determine the outcome of the 2012 election,” he said.

Hudson’s comments came June 18 at a social-issues panel held at the conference under the sponsorship of the Susan B. Anthony List. At a prior conference event,

Barbour spoke to attendees about the need to rally around a Republican nominee.

“In politics, purity is a loser,” while party unity “wins elections,” said Barbour, a Mississippi Republican.

“You are going to disagree with something about the candidate,” he added.

Barbour discussed his vision for a campaign that was focused on the economy and light on social issues.

He argued that the Tea Party movement cannot effectively serve as a third party, which would split the conservative vote.

Hudson, who led Catholic outreach for George W. Bush’s candidacy in 2000 and 2004, said the campaigns’ focus on reaching Mass-attending Catholics resulted in a swing of 15% more Catholics voting for the GOP nominee between 1996 and 2004.

“That’s the kind of swing that changes the outcome of an election,” Hudson said.

Barbour also said that prospective candidate and former Utah governor Jon Huntsman’s support for civil unions for homosexual couples was troubling and could be an “obstacle” for his candidacy.

“Any time you don’t have the platform position, you have to explain why not,” he said, according to The New York Times.

The Southern Republican Leadership Conference had more than 2,000 attendees. Speakers included presidential hopefuls former Pennsylvania Sen. Rick Santorum, former House Speaker Newt Gingrich and Reps. Michelle Bachmann, R-Minn., Ron Paul, R-Texas, and Herman Cain, R-Georgia.

Both Catholic candidates, Santorum and Gingrich, were received “warmly and enthusiastically,” Hudson reported.

Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal, a Catholic, also spoke at the conference.

 

Filed under catholics, election 2012, republicans, voting

Comments

Post a Comment

Any candidate who pulls the “put the socially conservative issues on the back burner this time around” game - is going to lose.  Real conservatives will stay home in droves.  We’re not buying another McCain. If were only offered a “slightly more conservative liberal,” we’re likely to let him (or her) go down in flames; we have a liberal now—why start over with another one?

As someone who spent 15 years as a Mormon, I think it is important for Catholic voters to consider more than simply Conservative values. Mormons actually refer to Catholicism as the “Great Abominable Church” within its “scriptures”! Would Catholics really want someone in the White House who views them in such a manner? In addition, all Christians should be aware that the Mormon leaders have taught openly that eventually they will be able to assume leadership of this country as they believe the US to be their “Zion”- their personal Jerulsalem. They truly believe that this is their country and eventually all other faiths will fade away as they lead us into the “final days”. And while the actual Mormon church prohibits polygamy, in the lesser-known aspects of Mormon doctrine, they teach that in the afterlife, a man can become a god himself and will have many wives. Romney cannot possibly support a union of one woman and one man because his religion ultimately does believe in polygamy; it is just a religious practice put on the back burner while law prohibits it. I have been a Republican all my life- but this will be the first election in which I will refuse to vote for the Republican Nominee. I simply cannot do it with clear conscience. Now, more than ever, it is absolutely imperative that as good Christians we examine who the candidates truly are- and a Mormon would not represent me and I am actually frightened of what a Mormon in the White House would mean for freedom of religion.

Post a Comment

By submitting this form, you give The National Catholic Register permission to publish this comment. Comments will be published at our discretion, and may be edited for clarity and length. For best formatting, please limit your response to one paragraph and don't hit "enter" to force line breaks.

Name:

Email:

Write your comment:

Please enter the word you see in the image below:

     

Notify me of follow-up comments.