Villains, it seems, are the new heroes. If this trend in animated family films didn’t quite begin in 2007 with the twin fractured fairy tales Happily N’Ever After and Shrek the Third, that was still the year that computer-animated villains began to express self-aware dissatisfaction with their second-class status and demand something more.
The next year there was Igor, a horror-movie spoof about a kingdom of mad scientists and a hunchbacked sidekick with creative aspirations of his own. Then, last year, Monsters vs. Aliens turned icons of 1950s’ monster movies — the Fly, the Blob and the Creature from the Black Lagoon as well as the 50-Foot Woman — into a team of superheroes.
Now there’s Despicable Me, a comic-book / 007 spoof on the supervillain archetype: Dr. Evil without Austin Powers. Later this year: Megamind, a superhero satire in which Superman’s origins are recapitulated in two opposing characters, a lantern-jawed hero named Metro Man and his blue-skinned nemesis.
Villain-centricity is a promising approach, but it hasn’t quite hit its stride — until now. Happily N’Ever After and Shrek the Third were lame and uninvolving. Igor, with its Universal horror riffs, wasn’t all bad, just kind of shapeless. Monsters vs. Aliens had energy and style to spare, but all its empathy was for its grrlpower heroine; all the male characters embodied male inadequacy, and there were no relationships to speak of.
Despicable Me, from newcomer Illumination Entertainment, is the best of the lot so far. It’s slicker and better-paced than all of the non-DreamWorks entries, and it has more energy than any of its predecessors except Monsters vs. Aliens. Best of all, it’s got heart and sweetness eluding all the earlier entries.
Heart? Sweetness? (In villainous European accent) Don’t make me LOL! Heart is for eating at breakfast time! Sweetness is only flavor of revenge! That’s how I roll!
That’s Gru, a “supervillain next door” type voiced with panache by Steve Carell. To his suburban neighbors, he’s a grumpy bald guy whose house looks like the Haunted Mansion and whose ride makes the Dark Knight’s Batmobile look like a Prius. He’s the one who makes tasteless “jokes” about killing your dog if it goes on his lawn again and pretends not to be home when girls come around selling cookies. You know the type.
Little do the neighbors know that beneath that eyesore house is a cavernous Laboratory of Eeevil, filled with countless genetically engineered Oompa Loompa-like minions working feverishly on Gru’s latest dastardly plots. Well, perhaps they aren’t quite as dastardly as Gru would like them to be. Stealing the Times Square Jumbotron was a big win for Gru. Okay, he did steal the Statue of Liberty and the Eiffel Tower, but … wait for it.
Now, though, there’s a mysterious new supervillain in town, and the scale of his heists — such as absconding with the Great Pyramid of Giza — threatens to make other supervillains look lame. Determined to make the A-list once and for all, Gru and his biggest admirer, a doddering Q-like tinkerer named Dr. Nefario (Russell Brand), scheme to shoot for the moon — if they can steal the shrink ray machine needed for the plot and then secure funding from the Bank of Evil to build the rocket they’ll also need.
By what byzantine complications this setup leads to Gru taking the precipitous step of adopting a trio of orphaned moppets from Miss Hattie’s House for Girls — the very same girls he gave the brush-off on his doorstep when they were selling cookies — I will not reveal here.
Suffice to say that while Gru finds himself unexpectedly pitted against an upstart nerdy supervillain (or villainous supernerd) called Vector (Jason Segel), who is both more and less than he seems, it’s the three moppets — Margo, Edith and Agnes (Miranda Cosgrove, Dana Gaier and Elsie Fisher) — that prove his biggest challenge.
It’s a familiar twist on the “Ransom of Red Chief” scenario, only instead of merely driving him to distraction, they get to him in other ways. Just imagine if Count Olaf from the Lemony Snicket books actually got hold of the Baudelaire children, and then had to deal with schlepping them to dance practice and escorting them to the amusement park.
It’s pretty predictable stuff, and it doesn’t all work. (The head of the orphanage, Miss Hattie (Kristen Wiig), is a bizarrely twisted Miss Hannigan type who slaps her charges in the Box of Shame for infractions real and imagined, a conceit that goes nowhere and does nothing. The only likely justification for this I can see would be if she turned out to be the mystery supervillain who stole the pyramid. (She doesn’t.) Even then, it would be better if she were all sweetness and light on the outside.)
But the moppets, generic as they are, really are super cute. (In an early scene, they offer a heartfelt prayer to be adopted.) Their interactions with Gru, e.g., tucking them in and reading them bedtime stories, slowly become genuinely lump-in-throat inducing. On the family-film spectrum of sincere and sentimental (Pixar, most of Blue Sky) to snarky and ironic (most of DreamWorks), Despicable Me leans solidly toward sincerity and sentiment.
Gru’s supervillainy is linked to parent issues: His mother (Julie Andrews!) is a scowling, disapproving harridan who squelches Gru’s boyhood dreams and needles him over his modest adult achievements. (Vector, too, turns out to have parent issues.) At the same time, Despicable Me suggests that we can overcome the deficiencies of our own upbringing and become better parents to our children than our parents were to us.
There’s something oddly endearing, too, about the lack of clear resolution in Gru’s relationship with his mother: Sometimes we have to learn to accept people as they are, including the fact that they may never see themselves as we see them. If we’re lucky, others may accept us the same way, however despicable we may or may not be.
Steven D. Greydanus is editor and chief critic at Decent Films. He also blogs at NCRegister.com.
Content advisory: Recurring rude humor; slapstick violence and animated excitement. Okay family viewing.


Comments
Post a Comment
Wow! I’m actually looking forward to this (again), and pleased to see it got a +2 on the DF Morality-O-Meter! When I first heard about it last year, the premise sounded awesome, and then when I saw the previews I was put off by Steve Carell’s terrible accent, which sounds like nothing so much as it does Michael Scott prank calling David Wallace with some completely unbelievable Russian accent in order to drag out some excruciatingly contrived plot during a sixth-season episode of “The Office”. Carell was good as Hammy the Squirrel, though, but for comic Russian accents done right, I refer you to Paul Frees.
Love the Lemony Snicket comparison. Wish I’d thought of that.
I also wondered about the increased number of villain-as-protagonist films, but I’m surprised that you didn’t mention what I think might be a really influential one: Joss Whedon’s made-for-the-internet musical, _Dr. Horrible’s Sing-a-long-Blog_. True, it wasn’t a feature film, and true, it wasn’t aimed at children, but I kept thinking about Dr. Horrible as I watched the preview for _Megamind_,and I couldn’t help wondering if there’s a connection. Did anyone else see a possible line of influence there, or am I giving Whedon too much credit?
I wouldn’t credit Dr. Horrible with inspiring Megamind, per se, but they do both seem to be, as you say, part of a broader trend featuring movies that revolve around the villains rather than the heroes. (See also the in-development Maleficent, which is based on the villain in Sleeping Beauty, and Wicked, which is based on the bad witch in The Wizard of Oz.)
Based on its most recent trailer, I would have to say that the most direct influence on Megamind is the Superman comics, with Megamind being a sort of parody of the classic Superman villain Brainiac. (One of the great scandals of the comic-book-movie genre is that they’ve made five movies about Superman so far and not *one* of them has featured this classic villain; instead, they all feature Lex Luthor, with the sort-of exception of Superman III, which features a brand new character who is basically a clone of the movie version of Lex Luthor.)
I’m sure you’re right about the Superman influence on Megamind: I’m not familiar enough with the original source material to know Brainiac, so I didn’t pick on that. Part of what I was thinking was that the smarmy “Metroman” (at least as shown in the preview I saw) was quite a bit like the self-centered Captain Hammer from Dr. Horrible. It may be, though, that that’s simply because the two films are mocking the same genre.
If some of the “Megamind” plot points which have been discussed online are accurate, then this seems directly inspired by “Dr. Horrible’s Sing-a-long ‘Blog” (only, as per “Mystery Men”, the girlfriend isn’t the one accidentally killed by the villian). But then, it also has a lot in common with the old “Astroman vs. Killbrain” bits on MadTV. Obviously both villians were inspired by Brainiac (who had a season on “Smallville”), but Metroman is Captain Hammer. But then since both were obviously inspired by the various “Superman is a [slang term]” memes, I suppose they reflect a cultural undercurrent that’s been flowing for a while.
What I want to know is where is my Incredibles vs. The Underminer movie?
I loved this movie, especially Gru, especially his accent. Not everyone from eastern Europe sounds Russian, and Gru’s accent sounded more like Ukrainian, maybe with a little Hungarian. A nice change: he just sounded like himself, not just a Boris Badenov clone. Marina Sirtis of Star Trek, who’s Cockney, also made up a pseudo-eastern-european “Betazoid” accent, just so no one could say she was doing it wrong.
I’d tell you what I liked best, but those would be spoilers. Just pay attention to the way all the main characters interact. Even the way Gru treats his minions and his elderly assistant tells you a lot about whats really underneath that dour exterior.
Your comment about “accept(ing) people as they are, including the fact that they may never see themselves as we see them”, hit close to home. Like “UP’, the story is really all about unconditional love.
FYI, the script that became Megamind was written and making the rounds in Hollywood well before Joss Whedon wrote, conceived and shot Dr. Horrible, during the writer’s strike. Originally, Ben Stiller was involved, and was going to play the title role—there’s a character VERY similar to Captain Hammer (ie, a vain obnoxious superhero more concerned with his image than with helping people) in Stiller’s earlier film, “Mystery Men”.
The Megamind project took about six years to get to theaters, and what seems to have gotten it greenlit was the huge success of Pixar’s The Incredibles.
So the similarities may or may not be coincidental, but if anything, Whedon may have been influenced by having seen the script for Megamind (originally called Mastermind). Someone in his position would know about a lot of projects the general public never hears about until they’re in theaters. The stories are different enough, and there’d be no question of plagiarism, but pretty much everything Whedon writes is derivative of something that came before.
Post a Comment
By submitting this form, you give The National Catholic Register permission to publish this comment. Comments will be published at our discretion, and may be edited for clarity and length. For best formatting, please limit your response to one paragraph and don't hit "enter" to force line breaks.