Print Article | Email Article | Write To Us

Daily News

Court Allows Texas to Defund Planned Parenthood (2413)

Gov. Rick Perry: 'In Texas, we choose life, and we will immediately begin defunding all abortion affiliates to honor and uphold that choice.'

10/29/2012 Comments (10)
Wikipedia

Texas Gov. Rick Perry

– Wikipedia

NEW ORLEANS — A federal appeals court has declined a rehearing for Planned Parenthood, which was trying to block Texas’ effort to defund its clinics in the state.

“Today’s ruling affirms yet again that in Texas the Women’s Health Program has no obligation to fund Planned Parenthood and other organizations that perform or promote abortion,” Texas Gov. Rick Perry said in a statement Oct. 25.

“In Texas, we choose life, and we will immediately begin defunding all abortion affiliates to honor and uphold that choice.”

In March, Texas indicated it would forgo federal funding for its Women’s Health Program and established a rule that barred clinics that perform elective abortions or affiliates of those that do from participating in the program.

Women’s Health Program provides health care for uninsured, low-income women throughout the state.

Planned Parenthood sued Texas, claiming that the state’s no-abortion provision violated their clinics’ First Amendment rights to free speech and association.

On Aug. 21 a three-judge panel of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals removed an April 30 injunction that had prevented Texas from defunding Planned Parenthood until a trial could be held about the issue.

That panel decided that “the authority of Texas to disfavor abortion within its own subsidized program is not violative of the First Amendment right.”

“Today, a unanimous appeals court rightfully recognized that the taxpayer-funded Women’s Health Program is not required to subsidize organizations that advocate for elective abortion,” Texas Attorney General Greg Abbot said Aug. 21.

“We are encouraged by today’s decision and will continue to defend the Women’s Health Program in court.”

Planned Parenthood requested a rehearing before the full appellate court, but was denied Oct. 25.

Judge Grady Jolly indicated that none of the circuit judges requested that the court be asked about the rehearing petition.

In reaction to the appellate court’s decision, Kenneth Lembrecht, president of Planned Parenthood of Greater Texas, said in a statement, “This case has never been about Planned Parenthood — it’s about the Texas women who turn to us every day.”

“Politics should never come between a woman and her health care, but in this decision, which conflicts with Supreme Court precedent, it appears it has.”

Reuters reported Oct. 26 that Planned Parenthood affiliates in Texas have filed a new challenge against the no-abortion provision in state court.

In a statement, Perry said Planned Parenthood was resorting to state court “in a desperate attempt to find some way to keep making money off Texas taxpayers.”

Said Perry, “We will keep fighting for life, and we will ultimately prevail.”

Texas’ rule against abortion affiliates participating in the Women’s Health Program is due to come into effect Nov. 1.

Reuters reported that because of the no-abortion provision in the Texas law, the federal government has said it will not renew its funding for the Texas program. The federal government currently pays for 90% of its cost.

 

Filed under abortion, governor perry, planned parenthood, texas

Comments

Post a Comment

GOD BLESS TEXAS! TAKING ON THE U.N. & PLANNED PARENTHOOD!

Way to go Gov Rick Perry! We are truly for life!

Go TEXAS!!!!!! May your courage be contagious!

Proud to be a Texan.

Thank you, Texas.  You truly care about the unborn AND women.

Rick Perry showed great courage and integrity!

This shows why court appointments are vital.  We need to elect a President who is the more pro-life of the 2 remaining candidates.
Here are some of the pro-choice things that Barack Obama has done:
1) funded Planned Parenthood with hundreds of millions of federal dollars
2) voted against stopping minors from crossing state lines for abortions
3) voted NO regarding informing parents about minors who get abortions out-of-state
3) was rated 100% by NARAL on pro-choice issue votes when he was in the Senate.
4) was rated 0% by the National Right-To-Life Committee, indicating a pro-choice stance
On the opposite side, Mitt Romney has been moderately pro-life, and certainly NOT the radical pro-choicer that Obama has always been.  And, Paul Ryan’s record was rated 100% by the National Right To Life Committee.

Mitt Romney’s VP selection of Paul Ryan could be a good indicator of his future appointments as President.  Paul Ryan’s pro-life record as a Wisconsin Congressman is outstanding.  The National Right-To-Life Committee rated him 100% pro-life, and (on the opposite side) NARAL rated Ryan’s record 0% pro-choice.

How long before Obama comes to the “rescue”?

AMEN TO THAT, Maggie. Christus Vincit, Christus, Regnant, Christus Un chi imperat

Post a Comment

By submitting this form, you give The National Catholic Register permission to publish this comment. Comments will be published at our discretion, and may be edited for clarity and length. For best formatting, please limit your response to one paragraph and don't hit "enter" to force line breaks.

The time period for commenting on this article has expired.